Skip to main content

An Empirical Assessment of Two Univariate Screening Measures in Cluster Analysis

  • Conference paper
Global Perspectives in Marketing for the 21st Century

Abstract

As researchers soon discover, the inclusion of noisy (irrelevant) variables in cluster analyses can obscure or distort Atrue@ subgroup structures. This problem, identified and discussed by Milligan (1980), has prompted the search for methods that identify noisy variables and either down-weight or remove them. Several researchers have investigated this problem and have met with limited success (DeSarbo, Carroll, Clark, and Green 1984, De Soete 1986, 1988). Recently, Donoghue (1995) and Carmone, Kara, and Maxwell (forthcoming, 1999) have proposed screening methods to identify and eliminate noisy variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Carmone, Jr., Frank J., Kara, Ali, and Maxwell, Sarah(1999), AHINoV, A New Model to Improve Market Segment Definition by Identifying Noisy Variables, @ forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J, Douglas (1973), AHoward-Harris Clustering,@ Appendix B in P.E. Green, and Y. Wind, Multiattribute Decisions in Marketing, Hindsale, IL: Dryden Press, 368-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff Norman (1992), PAIRDEL1.BAS. Program for Computing Matched-data D-statistics [computer program]. Los Angeles: Psychology Department, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, Norman (1993), ADominance Relations: Ordinal Analyses to Answer Ordinal Questions,® Psychological Bulletin, 114, 494-509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Soete, Geert (1986), A Optimal Variable Weighting for Ultrametric and Additive Tree Clustering, @ Quality and Quantity, 20, 169-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Soete, Geert (1988), Software Abstract, AOVWTRE: A Program for Optimal Variable Weighting for Ultrametric and Additive Tree Fitting,@ Journal of Classification, 5, 101-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Soete, Geert, DeSarbo, Wayne S., and Carroll, J. Douglas (1985), AOptimal Variable Weighting for Hierarchical Clustering: An Alternating Least-squares Algorithm,@ Journal of Classification, 2, 173-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, Wayne S., Carroll, J. Douglas, Clark, Linda A., and Green, Paul E. (1984), ASyntheslzed Clustering: A Method for Amalgamating Alternative Clustering Bases with Differential Weighting of Variables,@ Psychometrika, 49, 57-78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, John R. (1995), AUnivariate Screening Measures for Cluster Analysis,@ Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30 (3), 385-427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowlkes, E. G., Gnanadesikan, Ram, and Kettenring, John R. (1988), AVariable Selection in Clustering,@ Journal of Classification, 5, 205-228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. D. (1990), AConstructing Dissimilarity Measures,@ Journal of Classification, 7, 257-270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E., Carmone, Frank J., and Kim, Jonathan (1990), AA Preliminary Study of Optimal Variable Weighting in K-means Clustering,@ Journal of Classification, 7, 271-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, Lawrence, and Arabie, Phipps (1985), AComparing Partitions,@ Journal of Classification, 2,193-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, Glenn W. (1980), AAn Examination of the Effect of Six Types of Error Perturbation on Fifteen Clustering Algorithms,@ Psychometrika, 45, 325-342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, Glenn W. (1985), AAn Algorithm for Generating Artifical Test Clusters,@ Psychometrika, 50, 123-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, Glenn W. (1989), AA Validation Study of a Variable Weighting Algorithm for Cluster Analysis,@ Journal of Classification, 6, 53-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1985), SAS User=s Guide: Statistics, version 5 edition. Cary, NC: Author

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schaffer, C.M., Green, P.E., Carmone, F.J. (2015). An Empirical Assessment of Two Univariate Screening Measures in Cluster Analysis. In: Manrai, A., Meadow, H. (eds) Global Perspectives in Marketing for the 21st Century. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17356-6_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics