Skip to main content

Transforming Education Through Lesson Study: Thailand’s Decade-Long Journey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education

Abstract

The development of teaching and the teaching profession is an issue countries around the world have been struggling to solve for many centuries. Lesson study, a Japanese way of professional development of teachers, dates back nearly 140 years, in 1872 the Meiji government invited foreign teachers to teach Japanese teachers about “whole class instruction” (Isoda 2007). Ironically, in 1999, Stigler and Hiebert brought back to the U.S. the same idea on how to present whole class instruction, “If you want to improve education, get teachers together to study the processes of teaching and learning in classrooms, and then devise ways to improve them” [Stigler 2004 cited in Fernandez and Yoshida 2004]. Although the education reform movement around the world calls for effective reform tools or even ideas like Japanese lesson study, transferring those tools/ideas to other socio-cultural setting in other countries is not easy and always complicated. Thus, education reform movements sometimes support but sometimes hinder movement of society. Taking Japan as a case study, Japan has undergone the movement of society from agricultural to industrialized, to information, and knowledge-based society during the two centuries since the late 18th century to the present. Not visible to outside people, an evolution in the approach to school has taken place in Japan, which supports the movement of society, which has not occurred in most developing countries, including Thailand. Thailand has looked to Japan for ideas and has been implementing lesson study since 2000 but with a unique approach to adaptation. Thailand’s experience with lesson study has been shared with APEC member economies over the last six years and has been deemed “quite a success” in improvement of teaching and learning of mathematics.

This paper was first published in Lesson Study: Challenges in Mathematics Education (World Scientific, 2015). It has been reproduced with the permission of World Scientific Publishing Co.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inprasitha, M. (2004). Teaching by open-approach method in Japanese mathematics classroom. KKU Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inprasitha, M. (2006). Open-ended approach and teacher education. Tsukuba Journal of Education Study in Mathematics, 28, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inprasitha, M. (2007). Lesson Study in Thailand. In M. Isoda, M. Stephens, Y. Ohara, & T. Miyakawa (Eds.), Japanese lesson study in mathematics: Its impact, diversity and potential for educational improvement. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inprasitha, M. (2010). One feature of adaptive lesson study in Thailand: Designing Learning Unit (pp. 193–206). In Proceedings of the 45th Korean National Meeting of Mathematics Education. Korea: Gyeongju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inprasitha, M. (2011). One feature of adaptive lesson study in Thailand: Designing a learning unit. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 34(1), 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inprasitha, M., Loipha, S., & Silanoi, L. (2006). Development of effective lesson plan through lesson study approach-a Thai experience. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 25, 237–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isoda, M. (2004). History of Japanese Mathematics Education in English, Spanish and French. Retrieved from http://www.jica.or.id/english/publications/reports/study/topical/educational/index.html.

  • Isoda, M. (2007). Where did Lesson Study Begin, and How Far Has It Come?. In M. Isoda, M. Stephens, Y. Ohara, & T. Miyakawa (Eds.), Japanese lesson study in mathematics: Its impact, diversity and potential for educational improvement. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isoda, M., & Nakamura, T. (2010). The theory of problem solving approach. Journal of Japan Society of Mathematical Education: Special Issue (EARCOME5) Mathematics Education Theories for Lesson Study: Problem Solving Approach and Curriculum Through Extension and Integration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the World’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, S. (2006). Professional development through lesson study: A Japanese case. Paper presented for APEC International and Learning Mathematics through Lesson Study. Khonkaen, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maitree Inprasitha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Inprasitha, M. (2015). Transforming Education Through Lesson Study: Thailand’s Decade-Long Journey. In: Cho, S. (eds) Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics