Advertisement

Vehicle Orientated Initiatives for Improving the Environmental Performance of Urban Freight Systems

  • Russell G. ThompsonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Greening of Industry Networks Studies book series (GINS, volume 4)

Abstract

Freight vehicles contribute a substantial amount to the environmental impacts within cities. There are several emerging engine and alternative fuel technologies that have the potential to reduce the fossil fuel consumption as well as to improve the air quality within urban areas. Larger capacity vehicles allow more freight to be carried with less vehicles and can significantly reduce the amount of freight traffic and emissions. City Logistics schemes provide an opportunity for promoting innovative vehicle technologies. Partnerships between the public and private sectors can lead to solutions that lower the environmental and financial costs for freight transport. This chapter outlines a range of technologies and city logistics schemes that can improve the environmental performance of urban freight systems.

Keywords

Alternative fuel vehicles Performance based standard vehicles City logistics 

References

  1. BESTFACT. (2014). www.bestfact.net.
  2. BESTUFS. (2007). Good practice guide on urban freight transport. Best urban freight solutions. Karlsruhe: PTV. www.bestufs.net.
  3. Browne, M., Allen, J., Nemoto, T., Patier, D., & Visser, J. (2012). Reducing social and environmental impacts of urban freight transport: A review of some major cities. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Browne, M., Sweet, M., Woodburn, A., & Allen, J. (2005). Urban freight consolidation centers, final report. London: University of Westminster.Google Scholar
  5. Chester, M., & Horvath, A. (2007). Environmental life-cycle assessment of passenger transportation: A detailed methodology for energy, greenhouse gas and criteria pollutant inventories of automobiles, buses, light rail, heavy rail and air. Working Paper, UCB-ITS-VWP-2007-7, University of California, Berkeley Center for Future Urban Transport.Google Scholar
  6. Chester, M., & Horvath, A. (2009). Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains. Environmental Research Letters, 4, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Commission of the European Community. (2006). Keep Europe moving—Sustainable mobility for our continent. The Mid-Term Review of the European Commission’s 2001 Transport White Paper.Google Scholar
  8. Dablanc, L. (2007). Goods transport in large European cities: Difficult to organize, difficult to modernize. Transportation Research Part A, 41, 280–285.Google Scholar
  9. Di Christoforo, R., Blanksby, C., & Germanchev, A. (2006). Performance-based design of an innovative truck-trailer configuration, safer and more efficient distribution of liquid fuel in Australia. Transportation Research Record, 1966, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diziain, D., Taniguchi, E., & Dablanc, L. (2014). Urban logistics by rail and waterways in France and Japan. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellison, R. B., Greaves, S., & Hensher, D. A. (2013). Medium term effects of London’s low emission zone. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Hassall, K., & Thompson, R. G. (2011). Estimating the benefits of performance based standards vehicles. Transportation Research Record, 2224, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hassall, K., & Thompson, R.G. (2012). Determining productivity gains from performance-based standards vehicles in urban areas. In: Proceedings of 91st Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, January 22–26, 2012 (12-1887).Google Scholar
  14. Holguín-Veras, J., Ozbay, K., Kornhauser, A. L., Brom, M., Iyer, S., Yushimito, W., et al. (2011). Overall impacts of off-hour delivery programs in the New York City metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record, 2238, 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kikuta, J., Ito, T., Tomiyama, I., Yamamoto, S., & Yamada, T. (2012). New subway-integrated city logistics system. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 476–489.Google Scholar
  16. Leonardi, J., Browne, M., & Allen, J. (2012). Before-after assessment of a logistics trial with clean urban freight vehicles: A case study in London. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 146–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maes, J., & Vanelslander, T. (2012). The use of bicycle messengers in the logistics chain, concepts further revised. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 409–423.Google Scholar
  18. NSF. (2013). Improving freight system performance in metropolitan areas—NCFRP Project 38. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, CDM Smith, NYCDOT—HDR and University of Westminster, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  19. NTC. (2008). Performance based standards scheme—the standards and vehicle assessment rules, as at 10 November 2008 (incorporating all amendments consented to by the ATC up to that date). Melbourne: National Transport Commission.Google Scholar
  20. OECD. (1995). Performance based standards for the road sector. OECD Report, OECD Paris. http://www.oecd.org/document/44/0,2340,en_2649_37433_35693996_1_1_1_37433,00.html.
  21. OECD. (2003). Delivering the goods 21st century challenges to urban goods transport. OECD Report, OECD Paris.Google Scholar
  22. PIARC. (2012). Public sector governance of urban freight transport. PIARC Technical Committee B.4, Freight Transport and Inter-Modality, World Road Association.Google Scholar
  23. Sanburn, J. (2013, March 25). Deliver a fix for traffic jams, 10 big ideas in transportation. Time, 40.Google Scholar
  24. SUGAR. (2011). SUGAR: sustainable urban goods logistics achieved by regional and local policies. City logistics best practices: a handbook for authorities, www.sugarlogistics.eu.
  25. Taniguchi, E., Kawakatsu, S., & Tsuji, H. (2000). New co-operative system using electric vans for urban freight transport. In L. Sucharov & C. A. Brebbia (Eds.), Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century VI (pp. 201–210). Southampton, UK: WIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Thompson, R. G., & Taniguchi, E. (2014). Future directions. In City logistics—mapping the future. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Melbourne School of EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations