Skip to main content

Economic and Environmental Trade-Offs in Water Transportation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Green Logistics and Transportation

Part of the book series: Greening of Industry Networks Studies ((GINS,volume 4))

Abstract

In recent years slow steaming has resurfaced as a fuel saving measure allowing ship owners to significantly cut operational costs. Reduced fuel consumption leads to lower levels of greenhouse gases and pollutant emissions. Port authorities have considered offering incentives to ship operators that significantly reduce sailing speed in the port proximity, as a means to improve local air quality. This chapter conducts a literature review on emissions modelling methodologies for maritime transport and develops a framework that allows the estimation of pollutant emissions under different sailing scenarios. The chapter presents existing regulations and port initiatives that aim to reduce maritime emissions. The merits of localised slow steaming near the calling port for various case studies including different ship size, trip distance, sailing speed and fuel policies in place are examined. An activity based methodology is used to estimate fuel consumption and emissions savings during lower sailing speed operation for machinery on-board. Fuel price and the value of time lost govern the extent to which slow steaming and local speed reductions can be effective. The economic and environmental trade-offs occurring at different sailing speeds are discussed from the perspective of both the ship operator and the port authority considering the implications of regulatory policies such as the expansion of Emission Control Areas (ECA). The chapter concludes with a set of guidelines to port authorities on designing attractive speed reduction programmes, and recommendations to shipping companies on improving fuel efficiency across their schedule when such programmes are available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • California Air Resources Board. (2012). Ocean-going vessels—Fuel rule. Accessed July, 2013, from http://www.arb.ca.gov/ports/marinevess/ogv.htm.

  • Cariou, P. (2011). Is slow steaming a sustainable means of reducing CO2 emissions from container shipping? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16, 260–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. J., & Fischbeck, P. S. (2000). Emissions from waterborne commerce vessels in United States continental and inland waterways. Environmental Science and Technology, 34(15), 3254–3260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. J., & Koehler, H. W. (2003). Updated emissions from ocean shipping. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 108(D20).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. J., Fischbeck, P. S., & Pandis, S. N. (1999). Global nitrogen and sulfur inventories for oceangoing ships. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 104(D3), 3457–3470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. J., Wang, H., & Winebrake, J. J. (2009). The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(8), 593–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. J., Winebrake, J. J., Green, E. H., Kasibhatla, P., Eyring, V., & Lauer, A. (2007). Mortality from ship emissions: A global assessment. Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 8512–8518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolphin, M. J. & Melcer, M. (2008). Estimation of ship dry air emissions. Naval Engineers Journal 120(3), 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endresen, Ø., Sørgård, E., Behrens, H. L., Brett, P. O., & Isaksen, I. S. (2007). A historical reconstruction of ships' fuel consumption and emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 112(D12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2000). Analysis of commercial marine vessels emissions and fuel consumption data. Accessed March 2012, from http://www.epa.gov/oms/models/nonrdmdl/c-marine/r00002.pdf.

  • European Commission. (2005). Directive 2005/33/EC amending Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels. Accessed May 2013, from http://www.ops.wpci.nl/_images/_downloads/_original/1264149906_2005eudirectivesulphurcontentofmarinefuels2005_33.pdf.

  • European Commission and ENTEC UK Limited. (2002). Quantification of emissions from ships associated with ship movements between ports in the European Community. European Commission, DG ENV.C1, Rue de la Loi, 200, B-1049: Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyring, V., Köhler, H. W., van Aardenne, J., Lauer, A. (2005). Emissions from international shipping: 1. The last 50 years. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 110(D17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Randerson, J. T., & Rasch, P. J. (2007). Present‐day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 112(D11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hvattum, L. M., Norstad, I., Fagerholt, K., & Laporte, G. (2013). Analysis of an exact algorithm for the vessel speed optimization problem. Networks, 62(2), 132–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency. (2012). Electricity/Heat by Country /Region, OECD Member Countries. Accessed July 2014, from http://www.iea.org/stats/prodresult.asp?PRODUCT=Electricity/Heat.

  • International Maritime Organization. (1997). Annex VI prevention of air pollution from ships (entered into force 19 May 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Maritime Organization. (2014). Third IMO GHG Study 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffi, B., Szopa, S., Cozic, A., Hauglustaine, D., & Velthoven, P. V. (2010). Present and future impact of aircraft, road traffic and shipping emissions on global tropospheric ozone. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(23), 11681–11705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontovas, C. A., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2009). An online ship emissions calculator as a decision-making aid and policy evaluation tool. In 13th Congress of International Maritime Association of Mediterranean IMAM (pp. 12–15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, A. J. (2014). Explaining participation in voluntary vessel emission reduction programs at the ports of los angeles and long beach. In Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting (No. 14-1158).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyds Register Engineering Services (1999). ‘Marine exhaust emissions quantification study—mediterranean sea’, Report 99/EE/7044, Lloyds Register Engineering Services, London: UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M., Paul, J. A., & Gligor, D. M. (2013). Slow steaming impacts on ocean carriers and shippers. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15, 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAN Diesel A/S. (2009). Low container ship speed facilitated by versatile ME/ME-C engines. Accessed May 2013, from http://www.mandieselturbo.com/files/news/filesof8410/5510-0038-04.pdf.

  • Peters, G. P., Marland, G., Hertwich, E. G., Saikku, L., Rautiainen, A., & Kauppi, P. E. (2009). Trade, transport, and sinks extend the carbon dioxide responsibility of countries: An editorial essay. Climatic Change, 97(3–4), 379–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Port of Los Angeles. (2013). Inventory of air emissions—2012. Accessed March 2014, from http://www.portoflosangeles.org/pdf/2012_Air_Emissions_Inventory.pdf.

  • Psaraftis, H. N., & Kontovas, C. A. (2010). Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(8), 458–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trozzi, C., & Vaccaro, R. (1998). Methodologies for estimating air pollutant emissions from ships. Techne report MEET RF98.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2013). Review of maritime transport 2013. Accessed November 2014, from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2013_en.pdf.

  • Wang, C., Corbett, J. J., & Firestone, J. (2007). Modeling energy use and emissions from north american shipping: application of the ship traffic, energy, and environment model. Environmental science & technology, 41(9), 3226−3232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., & Meng, Q. (2012). Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network. Transportation Research Part E, 48, 701–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zis, T., North, R. J., Angeloudis, P., Ochieng, W. Y., & Bell, M. G. H. (2014). Evaluation of cold ironing and speed reduction policies to reduce ship emissions near and at ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 16(4), 371–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thalis Zis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zis, T., Angeloudis, P., Bell, M.G.H. (2015). Economic and Environmental Trade-Offs in Water Transportation. In: Fahimnia, B., Bell, M., Hensher, D., Sarkis, J. (eds) Green Logistics and Transportation. Greening of Industry Networks Studies, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17181-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics