Abstract
The advent of next generation sequencing technology has opened new avenues of research in microbes. In particular, the prices meltdown has made it possible sequencing hundreds of microbial genomes at once and at a reasonable cost. This advance in technology has increased our ability to test hypotheses at many levels, of which chief is the population level. Importantly, experiments ongoing for decades in which microbes have been evolving under different experimental regimes and evolutionary scenarios can be now taken to a next level of complexity. Mutation accumulation experiments coupled with genome sequencing reveals the many evolutionary trajectories of microbes under different environments, providing thereby an unprecedented power to explicitly testing fundamental hypotheses that remained hitherto in the realm of theory. Results and conclusions in this field illuminate the underlying selective forces determining the fixation of mutations and the contribution of fundamental mechanisms, such as epistasis, molecular chaperones, and gene duplication, in shaping the molecular spectrum of mutations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ahn TI, Lim ST, Leeu HK, Lee JE, Jeon KW (1994) A novel strong promoter of the groEx operon of symbiotic bacteria in Amoeba proteus. Gene 148:43–49
Aksoy S (1995) Molecular analysis of the endosymbionts of tsetse flies: 16S rDNA locus and over-expression of a chaperonin. Insect Mol Biol 4:23–29
Alvarez-Ponce D, Fares MA (2012) Evolutionary rate and duplicability in the Arabidopsis thaliana protein–protein interaction network. Genome Biol Evol 4:1263–1274. doi:10.1093/gbe/evs101
Atwood KC, Schneider LK, Ryan FJ (1951) Periodic selection in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 37:146–155
Barrick JE, Lenski RE (2013) Genome dynamics during experimental evolution. Nat Rev Genet. doi:10.1038/nrg3564
Bennett AF, Lenski RE (2007) An experimental test of evolutionary trade-offs during temperature adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(Suppl 1):8649–8654. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702117104
Blount ZD, Borland CZ, Lenski RE (2008) Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:7899–7906. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803151105
Blount ZD, Barrick JE, Davidson CJ, Lenski RE (2012) Genomic analysis of a key innovation in an experimental Escherichia coli population. Nature 489:513–518. doi:10.1038/nature11514
Bronikowski AM, Bennett AF, Lenski RE (2001) Evolutionary adaptation to temperature. VIII Effects of temperature on growth rate in natural isolates of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica from different thermal environments. Evolution 55:33–40
Buchner P (1965) Endosymbiosis of animals with plant microorganisms. Wiley, New York
Burke MK (2012) How does adaptation sweep through the genome? Insights from long-term selection experiments. Proc Biol Sci 279:5029–5038. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.0799
Burke MK, Long AD (2012) What paths do advantageous alleles take during short-term evolutionary change? Mol Ecol 21:4913–4916
Burke MK, Dunham JP, Shahrestani P, Thornton KR, Rose MR, Long AD (2010) Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila. Nature 467:587–590. doi:10.1038/nature09352
Carretero-Paulet L, Fares MA (2012) Evolutionary dynamics and functional specialization of plant paralogs formed by whole and small-scale genome duplications. Mol Biol Evol 29:3541–3551. doi:10.1093/molbev/mss162
Chou HH, Chiu HC, Delaney NF, Segre D, Marx CJ (2011) Diminishing returns epistasis among beneficial mutations decelerates adaptation. Science 332:1190–1192. doi:10.1126/science.1203799
Conant GC, Wolfe KH (2006) Functional partitioning of yeast co-expression networks after genome duplication. PLoS Biol 4:e109. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040109
Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Myrray (Ed). London
de Visser JA, Rozen DE (2006) Clonal interference and the periodic selection of new beneficial mutations in Escherichia coli. Genetics 172:2093–2100. doi:10.1534/genetics.105.052373
DePristo MA, Weinreich DM, Hartl DL (2005) Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet 6:678–687. doi:10.1038/nrg1672
Draghi JA, Parsons TL, Wagner GP, Plotkin JB (2010) Mutational robustness can facilitate adaptation. Nature 463:353–355. doi:10.1038/nature08694
Dykhuizen DE (1998) Santa Rosalia revisited: why are there so many species of bacteria? Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 73:25–33
Elena SF, Lenski RE (2003) Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 4:457–469. doi:10.1038/nrg1088
Fares MA, Ruiz-Gonzalez MX, Moya A, Elena SF, Barrio E (2002) Endosymbiotic bacteria: groEL buffers against deleterious mutations. Nature 417:398. doi:10.1038/417398a
Fares MA, Keane OM, Toft C, Carretero-Paulet L, Jones GW (2013) The roles of whole-genome and small-scale duplications in the functional specialization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes. PLoS Genet 9:e1003176. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003176
Fayet O, Ziegelhoffer T, Georgopoulos C (1989) The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures. J Bacteriol 171:1379–1385
Fogle CA, Nagle JL, Desai MM (2008) Clonal interference, multiple mutations and adaptation in large asexual populations. Genetics 180:2163–2173. doi:10.1534/genetics.108.090019
Futschik A, Schlotterer C (2010) The next generation of molecular markers from massively parallel sequencing of pooled DNA samples. Genetics 186:207–218. doi:10.1534/genetics.110.114397
Futuyma DJ (1998) Evolutionary biology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
Gans J, Wolinsky M, Dunbar J (2005) Computational improvements reveal great bacterial diversity and high metal toxicity in soil. Science 309:1387–1390. doi:10.1126/science.1112665
Giovannoni SJ, Tripp HJ, Givan S, Podar M, Vergin KL, Baptista D, Bibbs L, Eads J, Richardson TH, Noordewier M, Rappe MS, Short JM, Carrington JC, Mathur EJ (2005) Genome streamlining in a cosmopolitan oceanic bacterium. Science 309:1242–1245. doi:10.1126/science.1114057
Hakes L, Robertson DL, Oliver SG, Lovell SC (2007) Protein interactions from complexes: a structural perspective. Comp Funct Genomics 49356. doi: 10.1155/2007/49356
Hegreness M, Shoresh N, Hartl D, Kishony R (2006) An equivalence principle for the incorporation of favorable mutations in asexual populations. Science 311:1615–1617. doi:10.1126/science.1122469
Henderson B, Fares MA, Lund PA (2013) Chaperonin 60: a paradoxical, evolutionarily conserved protein family with multiple moonlighting functions. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 88:955–987. doi:10.1111/brv.12037
Kao KC, Sherlock G (2008) Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet 40:1499–1504. doi:10.1038/ng.280
Kawecki TJ, Lenski RE, Ebert D, Hollis B, Olivieri I, Whitlock MC (2012) Experimental evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 27:547–560. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.06.001
Khan AI, Dinh DM, Schneider D, Lenski RE, Cooper TF (2011) Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial population. Science 332:1193–1196. doi:10.1126/science.1203801
Krogh A (1929) Progress of physiology. Am J Physiol 90:9
Kvitek DJ, Sherlock G (2011) Reciprocal sign epistasis between frequently experimentally evolved adaptive mutations causes a rugged fitness landscape. PLoS Genet 7:e1002056. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002056
Lang GI, Rice DP, Hickman MJ, Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Botstein D, Desai MM (2013) Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations. Nature 500:571–574. doi:10.1038/nature12344
Lee MC, Chou HH, Marx CJ (2009) Asymmetric, bimodal trade-offs during adaptation of Methylobacterium to distinct growth substrates. Evolution 63:2816–2830. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00757.x
Lee H, Popodi E, Tang H, Foster PL (2012) Rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in the bacterium Escherichia coli as determined by whole-genome sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:E2774–E2783. doi:10.1073/pnas.1210309109
Lenski RE, Rose MR, Simpson SC, Stadler SC (2000) Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. Am Nat 138:27
Lenski RE, Winkworth CL, Riley MA (2003) Rates of DNA sequence evolution in experimental populations of Escherichia coli during 20,000 generations. J Mol Evol 56:498–508. doi:10.1007/s00239-002-2423-0
Lin Z, Rye HS (2006) GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 41:211–239. doi:10.1080/10409230600760382
Lynch M, Katju V (2004) The altered evolutionary trajectories of gene duplicates. Trends Genet 20:544–549. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2004.09.001
Lynch M, Sung W, Morris K, Coffey N, Landry CR, Dopman EB, Dickinson WJ, Okamoto K, Kulkarni S, Hartl DL, Thomas WK (2008) A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:9272–9277. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803466105
Makino T, McLysaght A (2010) Ohnologs in the human genome are dosage balanced and frequently associated with disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:9270–9274. doi:10.1073/pnas.0914697107
Mao EF, Lane L, Lee J, Miller JH (1997) Proliferation of mutators in A cell population. J Bacteriol 179:417–422
Marchetti M, Capela D, Glew M, Cruveiller S, Chane-Woon-Ming B, Gris C, Timmers T, Poinsot V, Gilbert LB, Heeb P, Medigue C, Batut J, Masson-Boivin C (2010) Experimental evolution of a plant pathogen into a legume symbiont. PLoS Biol 8:e1000280. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000280
Meyer JR, Dobias DT, Weitz JS, Barrick JE, Quick RT, Lenski RE (2012) Repeatability and contingency in the evolution of a key innovation in phage lambda. Science 335:428–432. doi:10.1126/science.1214449
Mira A, Ochman H, Moran NA (2001) Deletional bias and the evolution of bacterial genomes. Trends Genet 17:589–596
Miralles R, Gerrish PJ, Moya A, Elena SF (1999) Clonal interference and the evolution of RNA viruses. Science 285:1745–1747
Moran NA (1996) Accelerated evolution and Muller’s rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:2873–2878
Ohno S (1999) Gene duplication and the uniqueness of vertebrate genomes circa 1970–1999. Semin Cell Dev Biol 10:517–522. doi:10.1006/scdb.1999.0332
Orr HA (2009a) Fitness and its role in evolutionary genetics. Nat Rev Genet 10:531–539. doi:10.1038/nrg2603
Orr HA (2009b) Testing natural selection. Sci Am 300:44–50
Ostrowski EA, Woods RJ, Lenski RE (2008) The genetic basis of parallel and divergent phenotypic responses in evolving populations of Escherichia coli. Proc Biol Sci 275:277–284. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1244
Pace NR (1997) A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science 276:734–740
Pepin KM, Wichman HA (2008) Experimental evolution and genome sequencing reveal variation in levels of clonal interference in large populations of bacteriophage phiX174. BMC Evol Biol 8:85. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-85
Pikuta EV, Hoover RB, Tang J (2007) Microbial extremophiles at the limits of life. Crit Rev Microbiol 33:183–209. doi:10.1080/10408410701451948
Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ, Johnson T, Shaver A (2000) The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences. Bioessays 22:1057–1066. doi:10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12 <1057::AID-BIES3>3.0.CO;2-W
Strelkowa N, Lassig M (2012) Clonal interference in the evolution of influenza. Genetics 192:671–682. doi:10.1534/genetics.112.143396
Tenaillon O, Rodriguez-Verdugo A, Gaut RL, McDonald P, Bennett AF, Long AD, Gaut BS (2012) The molecular diversity of adaptive convergence. Science 335:457–461. doi:10.1126/science.1212986
Wagner A (2008) Neutralism and selectionism: a network-based reconciliation. Nat Rev Genet 9:965–974. doi:10.1038/nrg2473
Wielgoss S, Barrick JE, Tenaillon O, Wiser MJ, Dittmar WJ, Cruveiller S, Chane-Woon-Ming B, Medigue C, Lenski RE, Schneider D (2013) Mutation rate dynamics in a bacterial population reflect tension between adaptation and genetic load. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:222–227. doi:10.1073/pnas.1219574110
Wilke CO, Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Raval A (2005) Predicting the tolerance of proteins to random amino acid substitution. Biophys J 89:3714–3720. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.062125
Zeldovich KB, Berezovsky IN, Shakhnovich EI (2007) Protein and DNA sequence determinants of thermophilic adaptation. PLoS Comput Biol 3:e5. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030005
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fares, M.A. (2015). Experimental Evolution and Next Generation Sequencing Illuminate the Evolutionary Trajectories of Microbes. In: Sablok, G., Kumar, S., Ueno, S., Kuo, J., Varotto, C. (eds) Advances in the Understanding of Biological Sciences Using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approaches. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17157-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17157-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17156-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17157-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)