Electricity Trade Patterns in a Network

  • Talat S. Genc
  • Ege Yazgan
  • Pierre-Olivier Pineau

Abstract

Using high-frequency trade volume and price data in a transmission network we investigate patterns of trade and its impacts in the market price formation process. In particular, we study the Ontario wholesale electricity market and its trade with multiple interconnected markets, including New York, Michigan, and Minnesota, through 13 interconnections. This research has regulatory implications on integration of electricity markets, and possible investments in transmission and production capacity. The main findings are in order: (a) imports are unambiguously related to prices (significant Granger causality), while exports are not; (b) trade mainly occurs due to the market price differentials between the markets and traders can use past price observation to take trade positions before the markets clear; (c) there is a high degree of integration across the markets in the network, where the speed of convergence of cross prices is almost instantaneous.

Keywords

Electricity trade Transmission network Electricity prices Event study Non-linear Granger causality Ontario, New York, Michigan, Manitoba, Quebec wholesale electricity markets 

References

  1. 1.
    Genc T, Sen S (2008) An analysis of capacity and price trajectories for the Ontario electricity market using dynamic Nash equilibrium under uncertainty. Energ Econ 30(1):173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruedaa IEA, Marathe A (2005) Important variables in explaining real-time peak price in the independent power market of Ontario. Util Policy 13:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Melino A, Peerbocus N (2008) High frequency export and price responses in the Ontario electricity market. Energ J 29(4):35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi WH, Sen A, White A (2011) Response of industrial customers to hourly pricing in Ontario’s deregulated electricity market. J Regul Econ 40:303–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Serletis A, Dormaar P (2007) Imports, exports, and prices in Alberta’s deregulated power market (Chapter 10). In: Serletis A (ed) Quantitative and empirical analysis of energy markets. World Scientific Publishing, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aydemir A, Genc TS (2013) Power trade, welfare and air quality. Working paper. University of Guelph, Guelph, ONGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    IESO (2009) Overview of the IESO-administered markets. IESO, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    IESO (2009) IESO, 18-month outlook update – tables, released Nov 17. IESO, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Statistics Canada (2009) Electric power generation, transmission and distribution, 57-202-X. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, ONGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    IESO (2009) IESO, Ontario transmission system, IESO_REP_0265v150, Aug 21. IESO, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    IESO (2009) IESO, the power system. IESO, Toronto, ON, http://www.ieso.ca/imoweb/siteShared/power_system.asp Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Genc T, Reynolds S (2011) Supply function equilibria with capacity constraints and pivotal suppliers. Int J Ind Organ 29(4):432–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baldick R, Hogan W (2002) Stability of supply function equilibria: implications for daily versus hourly bids in a poolco market. Proceedings of the seventh annual POWER research conference. University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Genc T (2009) Discriminatory versus uniform-price electricity auctions with supply function equilibrium. J Optimiz Theory App 140(1):9–31MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Economet 66:225–250MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dolado J, Lütkepohl H (1996) Making Wald tests work for cointegrated VAR systems. Economet Rev 15(4):369–386CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Toda HY, Phillips PCB (1993) Vector autoregressions and causality. Econometrica 61(6):1367–1393MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hiemstra C, Jones JD (1994) Testing for linear and nonlinear granger causality in the stock price-volume relation. J Fin 49:1639–1664Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baek E, Brock W (1992) A general test for granger causality: bivariate model. Technical report. Iowa State University, Ames, IAGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Diks C, Panchenko V (2005) A new statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric granger testing. J Econ Dynam Control 1647–1669Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Talat S. Genc
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ege Yazgan
    • 3
  • Pierre-Olivier Pineau
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsIpek UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsKadir Has UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Decision SciencesHEC MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations