Abstract
In Chance and Necessity Monod masterfully spans the divide between humanities and sciences. For Monod, unlike subsequent renowned popularisers, science was one thing but what science evoked was quite another; he claimed that we should take the logic of science as far as it allowed. In this chapter, I revisit Monod’s reflections on Bergson —as did the famous evolutionary biologist Mayr —and I suggest that this philosopher’s vitalist theory should be reconsidered in the light of modern Biology, as should Driesch’s Embriology. The thesis on the need to give similar importance to both the parts of a biological entity as to the interactions between them is discussed within a wider context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Reference
Monod J (1972) El azar y la necesidad. Barral Editores, Barcelona
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moya, A. (2015). Chance and Necessity. In: The Calculus of Life. SpringerBriefs in Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16970-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16970-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16969-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16970-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)