Skip to main content

Chance and Necessity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Calculus of Life

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Biology ((BRIEFSBIOL))

  • 1166 Accesses

Abstract

In Chance and Necessity Monod masterfully spans the divide between humanities and sciences. For Monod, unlike subsequent renowned popularisers, science was one thing but what science evoked was quite another; he claimed that we should take the logic of science as far as it allowed. In this chapter, I revisit Monod’s reflections on Bergson —as did the famous evolutionary biologist Mayr —and I suggest that this philosopher’s vitalist theory should be reconsidered in the light of modern Biology, as should Driesch’s Embriology. The thesis on the need to give similar importance to both the parts of a biological entity as to the interactions between them is discussed within a wider context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  • Monod J (1972) El azar y la necesidad. Barral Editores, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés Moya .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moya, A. (2015). Chance and Necessity. In: The Calculus of Life. SpringerBriefs in Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16970-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics