Advertisement

PROgRESSIon—Investigating the Prototyping of Operational Estimation of Energy Fluxes and Soil Moisture Content Using a Variant of the “Triangle” Inversion Methodology

  • George P. PetropoulosEmail author
  • Gareth Ireland
Chapter
Part of the Springer Earth System Sciences book series (SPRINGEREARTH)

Abstract

Accurately estimating the spatio-temporal distribution of energy, mass and momentum at the surface–atmosphere interface can help develop a better understanding of the complex interactions of the Earth system. By linking deterministic land surface process model, such as SimSphere, to the spatialised information provided by Earth observation (EO) data, a more powerful synergistic avenue can be developed to take advantage of the temporal and spatial benefits of both modelling and EO-based approaches. The “triangle” utilises the distribution of land surface temperature (LST) and vegetation index (VI) formed by a satellite-derived scatterplot, linked with SimSphere under a full range of vegetation cover and soil moisture, to derive spatial estimates of energy fluxes and soil moisture content (SMC). To this end, the objective of this study was to implement the “triangle” technique using Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) satellite data products to derive and subsequently validate spatially explicit maps of land surface heat fluxes and SM for different ecosystems in Europe. The “triangle”-derived estimations of soil moisture exhibited a minor overestimation of the in-situ observations, and an average error of 0.097 vol vol−1. In overall, results were comparable to those of previous validation studies of the “triangle” implementation. Results for the LE and H fluxes were within the accuracy range of 50 Wm−2, with root mean square difference (RMSD) of 41.15 Wm−2 and 44.37 Wm−2, respectively. Furthermore, there was a good agreement between the “triangle”-derived and in-situ observed instantaneous LE and H fluxes, exhibited by high R values (0.88 and 0.69, respectively). Our study is one of the few studies validating the “triangle” over different ecosystems in Europe. It is a significant step forward in supporting the operational development of this method using remote sensing data in deriving key land surface parameters on a global scale.

Keywords

“Triangle” method AATSR SimSphere Land surface fluxes CarboEurope 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was produced in the framework of the PROgRESSIon (Prototyping the Retrievals of Energy Fluxes and Soil Moisture Content) project, funded by the European Space Agency (ESA) Support to Science Element (STSE) under contract STSE-TEBM-EOPG-TN-08-0005. Dr. Petropoulos gratefully acknowledges the financial support provided by the Agency. Dr. Petropoulos also gratefully acknowledges the financial support provided by the European Commission under the Marie Curie Career Re-Integration Grant “TRANSFORM-EO” project which also supported a part of the participation of G. Ireland in the completion of this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang Y, Li X, Tang S (2013) Validation of the SEBS-derived sensible heat for FY3A/VIRR and TERRA/MODIS over an alpine grass region using LAS measurements. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 23:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petropoulos GP (2008) Retrieval of surface energy fluxes and related land surface parameters at CARBOEUROFLUX test sites derived the SimSphere model and ASTER imagery analysis. PhD thesis, King’s College LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ezzahar J, Er-Raki S, Marah H, Khabba S, Amenzou N, Chehbouni G (2012) Coupling soil-vegetationatmosphere-transfer model with energy balance model for estimating energy and water vapor fluxes over an olive grove in a semi-arid region. Glob Meteorol 1(1):e1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vereecken H, Huisman JA, Pachepsky Y, Montzka C, van der Kruk J, Bogena H, Weihermüller L, Herbst M, Martinez G, Vanderborght J (2014) On the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil moisture at the field scale. J Hydrol 516:76–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sánchez-Ruiz S, Piles M, Sánchez N, Martínez-Fernández J, Vall-llossera M, Camps A (2014) Combining SMOS with visible and near/shortwave/thermal infrared satellite data for high resolution soil moisture estimates. J Hydrol 516:273–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brocca L, Melone F, Moramarco T, Wagner W, Naeimi V, Bartalis Z, Hasenauer S (2010) Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 7(4):4113–4144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koster RD, Mahanama SP, Livneh B, Lettenmaier DP, Reichle RH (2010) Skill in streamflow forecasts derived from large-scale estimates of soil moisture and snow. Nat Geosci 3(9):613–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Albergel C, Calvet JC, De Rosnay P, Balsamo G, Wagner W, Hasenauer S, Naeimi V (2010) Cross-evaluation of modelled and remotely sensed surface soil moisture with in situ data in southwestern France. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(11):2177–2191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drusch M (2007) Initializing numerical weather prediction models with satellite-derived surface soil moisture: data assimilation experiments with ECMWF’s integrated forecast system and the TMI soil moisture data set. J Geophys Res 112:D03102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bolten JD, Crow WT, Zhan X, Jackson TJ, Reynolds CA (2010) Evaluating the utility of remotely sensed soil moisture retrievals for operational agricultural drought monitoring. Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sens, IEEE J 3(1):57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Odhiambo JJO, Bomke AA (2007) Cover crop effects on spring soil water content and the implications for cover crop management in south coastal British Columbia. Agric Water Manag 88(1):92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Loew A, Holmes T, de Jeu R (2009) The European heat wave 2003: early indicators from multisensoral microwave remote sensing? J Geophys Res 114:D05103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miralles DG, Holmes TRH, De Jeu RAM, Gash JH, Meesters AGCA, Dolman AJ (2011) Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(2)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gamerith V, Neumann MB, Muschalla D (2013) Applying global sensitivity analysis to the modelling of flow and water quality in sewers. Water Res 47(13):4600–4611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heydari S, Miranda-Moreno LF, Lord D, Fu L (2014) Bayesian methodology to estimate and update safety performance functions under limited data conditions: a sensitivity analysis. Accid Anal Prev 64:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miro S, Hartmann D, Schanz T (2014) Global sensitivity analysis for subsoil parameter estimation in mechanized tunneling. Comput Geotech 56:80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu E, Zhang H (2013) Spatially-explicit sensitivity analysis for land suitability evaluation. Appl Geography 45:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ridler ME, Sandholt I, Butts M, Lerer S, Mougin E, Timouk F, Kergoat L, Madsen H (2012) Calibrating a soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer model with remote sensing estimates of surface temperature and soil surface moisture in a semi arid environment. J Hydrol 436:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li Y, Zhou J, Kinzelbach W, Cheng G, Li X, Zhao W (2013) Coupling a SVAT heat and water flow model, a stomatal-photosynthesis model and a crop growth model to simulate energy, water and carbon fluxes in an irrigated maize ecosystem. Agric For Meteorol 176:10–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olioso A, Chauki H, Courault D, Wigneron JP (1999) Estimation of evapotranspiration and photosynthesis by assimilation of remote sensing data into SVAT models. Remote Sens Environ 68(3):341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Olioso A, Inoue Y, Ortega-Farias S, Demarty J, Wigneron JP, Braud I, Jacob F, Lecharpentier P, Ottle C, Calvet J-C, Brisson N (2005) Future directions for advanced evapotranspiration modeling: assimilation of remote sensing data into crop simulation models and SVAT models. Irrigat Drain Syst 19(3–4):377–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Demarty J, Ottlé C, Braud I, Olioso A, Frangi JP, Bastidas LA, Gupta HV (2004) Using a multiobjective approach to retrieve information on surface properties used in a SVAT model. J Hydrol 287(1):214–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moran MS, Peters-Lidard CD, Watts JM, McElroy S (2004) Estimating soil moisture at the watershed scale with satellite-based radar and land surface models. Can J Remote Sens 30(5):805–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Olioso A (1992) Simulation des 6changes d’6nergie et de masse d’un convert v6gandal, dans le but de relier ia transpiration et la photosynthese anx mesures de reflectance et de temp6rature de surface. Doctorate thesis, pp 1–260Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brunsell NA, Ham JM, Owensby CE (2008) Assessing the multi-resolution information content of remotely sensed variables and elevation for evapotranspiration in a tall-grass prairie environment. Remote Sens Environ 112(6):2977–2987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang H, Jia G (2013) Regional estimates of evapotranspiration over Northern China using a remote-sensing-based triangle interpolation method. Adv Atmos Sci 30:1479–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shu Y, Stisen S, Jensen KH, Sandholt I (2011) Estimation of regional evapotranspiration over the North China Plain using geostationary satellite data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 13(2):192–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Carlson TN (2007) An overview of the—triangle methodl for estimating surface evapotranspiration and soil moisture from satellite imagery. Sensors 7:1612–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tang R, Li ZL, Tang B (2010) An application of the T s–VI triangle method with enhanced edges determination for evapotranspiration estimation from MODIS data in arid and semi-arid regions: implementation and validation. Remote Sens Environ 114(3):540–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mallick K, Bhattacharya BK, Patel NK (2009) Estimating volumetric surface moisture content for cropped soils using a soil wetness index based on surface temperature and NDVI. Agric For Meteorol 149(8):1327–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Petropoulos GP, Carlson TN, Wooster MJ, Islam S (2009) A review of T s/VI remote sensing based methods for the retrieval of land surface fluxes and soil surface moisture content. Adv Phys Geography 33(2):1–27Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Petropoulos GP (2013) Remote sensing of land surface turbulent fluxes and soil moisture: state of the art. Taylor & Francis Book. ISBN: 978-1-4665-0578-0, p 506Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    European Space Agency (2007) AATSR product handbook. Available at: https://earth.esa.int/handbooks/aatsr/CNTR.htm
  34. 34.
    Petropoulos GP, Carlson TN, Wooster M (2009) An overview of the use of the Simsphere soil vegetation atmospheric transfer (SVAT) model for the study of land atmosphere interactions. Sensors 9:4286–4308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Petropoulos GP, Griffiths HM, Tarantola S (2013) A sensitivity analysis of the Simsphere SVAT model in the context of EO-based operational products development. Environ Model Softw 49:166–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baldocchi DD, Valentini R, Running SR, Oechel W, Dahlman R (1996) Strategies for measuring and modeling carbon dioxide and waterfluxes over terrestrial ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 2:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gamnitzer U, Karstens U, Kromer B, Neubert RE, Meijer HA, Schroeder H, Levin I (2006) Carbon monoxide: a quantitative tracer for fossil fuel CO2? J Geophys Res 111:D22302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Levin I, Karstens U (2007) Quantifying fossil fuel CO2 over Europe. In: Dolman AJ, Freibauer A, Valentini R (eds) Observing the continental scale greenhouse gas balance of Europe. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Levin I, Karstens U (2007) Inferring high-resolution fossil fuel CO2 records at continental sites from combined 14CO2 and CO observations. Tellus 59B:245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gillies RR, Carlson TN (1995) Thermal remote sensing of surface soil water content with partial vegetation cover for incorporation into climate models. J. Appl. Meteorol. 34(4):745–756Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Choudhury BJ, Ahmed NU, Idso SB, Reginato RJ, Daughtry CS (1994) Relations between evaporation coefficients and vegetation indices studied by model simulations. Remote sensing of environment 50(1):1–17Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brunsell NA, Gillies RR (2003) Scale issues in land-atmosphere interactions: implications for remote sensing of the surface energy balance. Agric For Meteorol 117:203–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chauhan NS, Miller S, Ardanuy P (2003) Spaceborne soil moisture estimation at high resolution: a microwave–optical/IR synergistic approach. Int J Remote Sens 22:4599–4622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gillies RR, Carlson TN, Cui J, Kustas WP, Humes KS (1997) Verification of the “triangle” method for obtaining surface soil water content and energy fluxes from remote measurements of the normalized difference vegetation index NDVI and surface radiant temperature. Int J Remote Sens 18:3145–3166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jiang L (2000) Estimation of land surface evaporation map over large areas using remote sensing data. PhD Thesis, University of CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Validation Report Evapotranspiration Products LSA-16 (MET), LSA (DMET) (2010) Doc Number, SAF/LAND/RMI/VR/06. Available at: http://landsaf.meteo.pt/GetDocument.do;jsessionid=9588908831FFC55ECD304FB798539712?id=309. Accessed on 1 Sept 2011
  47. 47.
    Sellers P, Hall FG, Asrar J, Strubel DE, Murthy RE (1992) An overview of the First Intenational Satellite Land Surface Climatology project (ISLSCP) Field Experiment (FIFE). J. Geophys. Res. 97:18345–18371Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kustas WP, Goodrich DC (1994) Preface. MONSOON’90 multidisciplinary experiment. Water Resour Res 30(5):1211–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brunsell NA (2003) An examination of scale issues involved with remotely sensed data. PhD Thesis, University of UtahGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jiang L, Islam S (2003) An intercomparison of regional heat flux estimation using remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens 24:2221–2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nishida K, Nemani R, Glassy J, Running S (2003) Development of an evapotranspiration index from aqua/MODIS for monitoring surface moisture status. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41(2):493–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Verstraeten WW, Veroustraete F, Feyen J (2005) Estimating evapotranspiration of European forests from NOAA-imagery at satellite overpass time: towards an operational processing chain for integrated optical and thermal sensor data products. Remote Sens Environ 96:256–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang K, Li Z, Cribb M (2006) Estimation of evaporative fraction form a combination of day and night land surface temperatures and NDVI: a new method to determine the Priestley-Taylor parameter. Remote Sens Environ 102:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Earth SciencesUniversity of AberystwythAberystwythIreland

Personalised recommendations