Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper questions the concept of an institutionalized corporate conscience, suggests that business responsibility can only be personal, and recommends an ethical framework for the marketing executive in corporate life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Ackerman, R. Bauer: Corporate Social Responsiveness, (Reston 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert Z. Carr, “Can an Executive Afford a Conscience?” Harvard Business Review, (July–August 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Eells, C. Walton: Conceptual Foundations of Business, (Irwin 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. F. Engel, R. D. Blackwell, D. T. Kollat: Consumer Behavior (The Dryden Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fletcher: Situation Ethics, (The Westminster Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Friedman: Capitalism and Freedom, (University of Chicago Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. H. Hamilton, “On the Composition of the Corporate Veil”, Publications of the Brandeis Lawyers’ Society (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. A. R. Leys: Ethics for Policy Decisions, (Prentice-Hall, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodore Levitt, “The Dangers of Social Responsibility”, Harvard Business Review, (September–October, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chief Justice Marshall, case of The Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheaton 518 (1819).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Patterson, “What are the Social and Ethical Responsibilities of Marketing Executives?” Journal of Marketing, (July, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop J. A. Pike, “The Claim of Situational Ethics”, A.A.A.A. Annual Meeting, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. B. Weiss, “Marketers Fiddle While Consumers Burn”, Harvard Business Review, (July–August, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wm. H. Whyte, Jr.: The Organization Man, (Simon and Schuster, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Evans, W.A. (2016). Marketing and the Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Gitlow, H.S., Wheatley, E.W. (eds) Proceedings of the 1979 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16934-7_78

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics