Advertisement

Keeping the Flow: Creating Opportunities Based on Well Structured Collaboration

  • Patrick Halek
  • Günter Strobl

Abstract

As against most common views, complexity is nothing new. We’ve simply just started to realise. Therefore, we have to find ways of dealing with a complex environment and its ambiguous, uncertain face. Due to an enormous explosion of knowledge in almost every field of our lives we can see that well-known recipes and rules for success do not work anymore. Trying harder makes it even worse, since the rules of the game have changed. Even more so: the game is a different one. Knowledge creating uniqueness becomes the key for competitive advantages, resilience and sustainable vitality more and more (The new edge in knowledge. How knowledge management is changing the way we do business. Wiley, Hoboken, 2011). Therefore, organisations have to take an active role in shaping their own position continuously taking advantage of creating such knowledge. Based on a new collaborative approach, the authors describe a well-structured mix of methods and instruments introducing “Cooperative Management-Systems”, the “CS-Procedure” and the “Heartbeat-Model”. This way, a complex and ambiguous environment is not just a threat to organisations but a playground for opportunities.

Keywords

Ambiguity Change Collaboration Complexity Cooperative management Core competence Growth Innovation Knowledge-management Multiplicity Opportunities Sociocracy Stakeholder-management Uncertainty Value Volatility 

References

  1. Beinhocker E (2007) The origin of wealth. Evolution, complexity, and the radical remaking of economics. Random House Business, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Chandler D (2014) Resilience. The governance of complexity. Critical issues in global politics. Routledge, AbingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Collinson S, Jay M (2012) From complexity to simplicity. Unleash your organisation’s potential. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  4. Endenburg G (1998) Sociocracy: the organization of decision-making. Eburon Academic Press, DelftGoogle Scholar
  5. Freeman RE (2010) Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, de Colle S (2010) Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldberg U (2012) What’s next for the startup nation? A blueprint for sustainable innovation. AuthorHouse, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. Halek P, Nyiri A (2002) The heartbeat-model. Bridging the gap between strategic marketing and knowledge-management (German). Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  9. Heraclitus of Ephesus (2014) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heraclitus. Accessed Oct 2014
  10. Holden N, Glisby M (2010) Creating knowledge advantage. The tacit dimensions of international competition and cooperation. Samfundslitteratur, LeedsGoogle Scholar
  11. Johansen B, Ronn K (2014) The reciprocity advantage. A new way to partner for innovation and growth. Berrett-Koehler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones T, McCormick D, Dewing C (2012) Growth champions: the battle for sustained innovation leadership. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. McMillan E (2008) Complexity, organizations and the dynamics of change. Challenges for practise. Routledge, AbingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller JH, Page SE (2007) Complex adaptive systems. An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  15. Mullins LJ (2013) Management and organisational behaviour. FT Publishing International, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  16. Nash JF (1951) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_equilibrium. Accessed Oct 2014
  17. O’Dell C, Hubert C (2011) The new edge in knowledge. How knowledge management is changing the way we do business. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  18. Rzevski G, Skobelev P (2014) Managing complexity. WIT, BillericaGoogle Scholar
  19. Sarkis J, Cordeiro JJ, Brust DV (2010) Facilitating sustainable innovation through collaboration. A multi-stakeholder perspective. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  20. Skyrme D (1999) Knowledge networking. Creating the collaborative company. Routledge, AbingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Song J, Lee K (2014) The samsung way. Transformational management strategies from the world leader in innovation and design. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Stacey RD (2010) Strategic management and organisational dynamics. The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  23. Watzlawick P (1976) Wie wirklich ist die Wirklichkeit—Wahn, Täuschung, Verstehen. Piper, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilkinson D (2006) The ambiguity advantage. What great leaders are great at. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson A (2010) Knowledge power. Interdisciplinary education for a complex world. Routledge, AbingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. Zbinden B, Charest G (2010) La force du groupe, un facteur de rétablissement individuel et collectif. http://association.graap.ch/index.php/qui-sommes-nous/valeurs-et-mission/le-mode-de-gouvernance-sociocratique

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BlueformanceViennaAustria
  2. 2.ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations