Skip to main content

MalariaScope’s User Interface Usability Tests: Results Comparison Between European and African Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
e-Infrastructure and e-Services for Developing Countries (AFRICOMM 2014)

Abstract

Malaria is one of the most severe public health problems worldwide. It is estimated that 3.3 billion people live in areas at risk of malaria transmission, and in 2010 caused around 655,000 deaths, 91 % of them in the African Region. In this study we assess if the mHealth application “MalariaScope” developed by Fraunhofer Portugal AICOS (FhP AICOS) found to be usable and satisfactory by users from a European country, Portugal, can achieve similar positive results in an African country, Mozambique, which is one of its intended contexts of use. To this end, an academic partner from that African country conducted locally a usability evaluation of the application following the same procedure with participants with similar scientific backgrounds to the Portuguese counterparts. A comparison of the usability metrics of the two evaluations found no significant differences between the Portuguese and Mozambican set of users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anokwa, Y., et al.: Stories from the field: reflections on HCI4D experiences. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 5, 4 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bangor, A., et al.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189, 194 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dray, S., et al.: Indra’s Net: HCI in the developing world. Interactions 10(2), 28–37 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ho, M., Smyth, T.: Human-computer interaction for development: the past, present, and future. Ldots Int. Dev. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jensen, K., et al.: NUIs for new worlds: new interaction forms and interfaces for mobile applications in developing countries. In: CHI 2012 Ext. Ldots, pp. 2779–2782 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lalji, Z., Good, J.: Designing new technologies for illiterate populations: a study in mobile phone interface design. Interact. Comput. 20(6), 574–586 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mierzwa, S., et al.: Effective approaches to user-interface design with ACASI in the developing world. Interactions 20(3), 58–61 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nielsen, J., Landauer, T.K.: A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of the INTERACT 1993 and CHI 1993 conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 206–213 ACM (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Poole, E.S.: HCI and mobile health interventions. Transl. Behav. Med. 3(4), 402–405 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosado, L. et al.: Automatic Detection of Malaria Parasites in Thick Blood Smears. 7o Congresso Luso-Moçambicano de Engenharia/IV Congresso Inhambane. Simpósio No17, Moçambique (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Russo, P., Boor, S.: How fluent is your interface?: designing for international users. In: Proceedings of INTERACT 1993 CHI 1993 Ldots (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shen, S.-T., et al.: Towards culture-centred design. Interact. Comput. 18(4), 820–852 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sherwani, J., et al.: Orality-grounded hcid: understanding the oral user. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 5(4), 37 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, A., et al.: A process model for developing usable cross-cultural websites. Interact. Comput. 16(1), 63–91 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Toyama, K.: Human–computer interaction and global development. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4(1), 1–79 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Walsh, T., Vainio, T.: Cross-cultural design for mhealth applications. In: Extended Abstracts of the Third International Workshop on Smart Healthcare Applications, p. 1 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the financial support obtained from North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (ON.2 - O Novo Norte), Portuguese National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) from European Union through the project ICT4DCC (ICT4D Competence Center) NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000042.

Also, our appreciation to the ICT4D Competence Center’s partners, CI-UEM (Informatics Center of University Eduardo Mondlane, Mozambique) and NMMU (Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South-Africa) for logistical support and revision process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Giesteira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Devezas, T., Domingos, L., Vasconcelos, A., Carreira, C., Giesteira, B. (2015). MalariaScope’s User Interface Usability Tests: Results Comparison Between European and African Users. In: Nungu, A., Pehrson, B., Sansa-Otim, J. (eds) e-Infrastructure and e-Services for Developing Countries. AFRICOMM 2014. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 147. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16886-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16886-9_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16885-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16886-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics