Revisiting the African Economic Growth Agenda: Focus on Inclusive and Pro-poor Growth?

Part of the Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development book series (AAESPD)

Abstract

This paper determines whether the recent growth trajectory in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has been inclusive and pro-poor and discusses potential policies in making growth more inclusive. The motivation for the study is that in the economic literature, economic growth is viewed as fundamental in achieving poverty reduction, changes in income distribution are expected to lead to improving the poverty reduction outcome stemming from growth, and initial inequality would reduce the impact of growth on poverty reduction. Two conventional definitions commonly used in the literature to measure whether economic growth is pro-poor require knowledge of whether there have been distributional changes in income and whether those changes have improved the welfare of the poor. First, regional analyses show that compared to the rest of the world’s regions, SSA experienced negative per capita growth from 1985 through 2000, and that this was accompanied by significant decline in income distribution such that by 2000 the average income of an African in the lowest quintile of economic distribution was only 90 % of the income in 1985. Second, country-specific analyses show that unlike many East Asian economies that recorded average income growth along with their poorest quintile, in SSA economies even when growth in average income occurred, the incomes of the poorest Africans fell. The exceptions were in Gabon and to a smaller extent Ghana. Third, analyses of recent data showed that like the rest of the world’s developing regions, after realizing rising poverty rates from 1981 to 1999, SSA also saw steady declines in extreme poverty rate by 10 % from 1999 through 2010. However, it was the only region where the number of extreme poor rose from 205 million in 1981 to 414 million in 2010 with its global share rising from 11 to 34 %. The average gap of the extremely poor in SSA rose from $0.53 per day in 1981 to $0.54 a day compared to the $1.25 per day threshold for the extremely poor, and compared to the developing country average of $0.51 per day to $0.29 per day for the same time period. Therefore, the aggregate SSA extreme poverty gap doubled from $40 billion in 2005 PPP terms in 1981 to $82 billion in 2005 PPP terms in 2010 compared to the aggregate for all developing countries that fell by half from $362 to $169 billion all in 2005 PPP terms during the same time period. Therefore, the paper concludes that recent growth in SSA has not been pro-poor. Suggestions are provided to sustain growth across the SSA region to make growth more inclusive.

Keywords

Poverty Pro-poor growth Inclusive growth 

JEL Classification

I32 O40 

References

  1. Acemoglu D (2009) What makes a nation rich? Esquire, November 18Google Scholar
  2. Adedeji OS, Du H, Opoku-Afari M (2013) Inclusive growth: an application of the social opportunity function to selected African countries. IMF Working Paper WP/13/139, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. African Development Bank (2012) African economic outlook. http://www.africaneconomicoutlook.org/en/outlook/. Accessed 15 Apr 2014
  4. African Union (2013) Agenda 2063. Background Note. agenda2063.au.int/en/documents. Accessed 15 Apr 2014Google Scholar
  5. Aryeetey E, McKay A (2004) Operationalizing pro-poor growth: a case study on Ghana. Prepared as part of the Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth Research Program, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourguignon F (2003) The growth elasticity of poverty reduction: explaining heterogeneity across countries and time periods. In: Eicher T, Turnovsky S (eds) Growth and inequality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Byerlee D, Jackson C (2005) Agriculture, rural development and pro-poor growth: country experiences in the post reform era. Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth Research Program, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Campos JE, Root H (1996) The key to the Asian miracle: making shared growth credible. Brookings Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen S, Ravallion M (2004) How did the world’s poorest fare in the 1990s? Global Monitoring Database. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Clements B, Gupta S, Nozaki M (2011) What happens to social spending in IMF-supported programs? IMF Staff Discussion Note 15Google Scholar
  11. Collier P (2007) The bottom billion: why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it? Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Cord L, Lopez JH, Page J (2003) ‘When I use a word’…pro poor growth and poverty reduction. In: Krakowski M (ed) Attacking poverty: what makes growth pro-poor? Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  13. Datt G, Ravallion M (1992) Growth and redistribution components of change in poverty measures: a decomposition with application to Brazil and India in the 1980s. J Dev Econ 38(2):275–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deininger K, Squire L (1996) A new data set measuring income inequality. World Bank Econ Rev 10:565–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dollar D, Kraay A (2002) Growth is good for the poor. J Econ Growth 7:195–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Easterly W (1999) Life during growth. J Econ Growth 4:239–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foster J, Szekely M (2000) How good is growth. Asian Dev Rev 18:59–73Google Scholar
  18. Fosu A (2011) Growth, inequality and poverty reduction in developing countries: recent global evidence. United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER) Working Paper 2011/01, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaddah M, Munro A (2011) The progressivity of health care services in Ghana. Discussion Paper 11-14, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia-Verdu R, Selasse AA, Thomas A (2011) How inclusive has Africa’s recent high-growth episode been? In: Regional economic outlook: Sub-Saharan Africa. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, pp 15–33Google Scholar
  21. Juma C (2011) The new harvest: agricultural innovation in Africa. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  22. Kakwani N, Pernia E (2000) What is pro-poor growth? Asian Dev Rev 18:1–16Google Scholar
  23. Klasen S (2003) In search of the Holy Grail: how to achieve pro-poor growth? In: Proceedings of ABCDE-Europe. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Kraay A (2004) When is growth pro-poor? Cross-country evidence. IMF Working Paper WP/04/47Google Scholar
  25. Kraay A (2005) When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries. J Dev Econ 80(1):198–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lopez JH (2004) Pro-growth, pro-poor: is there a tradeoff? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3378, Washington, DC (August)Google Scholar
  27. OECD (2006) Promoting pro-poor growth: key policy messages. OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Okidi JA, Ssewanyana S, Bategeka L, Mihumuza F (2005) Operationalizing pro-poor growth: a case study of Uganda. Prepared as part of the operationalizing pro-poor growth research program, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001) Rising to the global challenge: partnership for reducing world poverty. Statement by the DAC high level meeting, OECD, Paris, 25–26 AprilGoogle Scholar
  30. Page J (2006) Strategies for pro-poor growth: pro-poor, pro-growth or both? J Afr Econ 15(4):510–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patillo C, Gupta S, Carey K (2006) Sustaining and accelerating pro-poor growth in Africa. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Ravallion M (2001) Growth, inequality and poverty: looking beyond averages. World Dev 29:1803–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ravallion M, Chen S (1997) What can new survey data tell us about recent changes in distribution and poverty? World Bank Econ Rev 11:357–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stuart E (2011) Making growth inclusive: some lessons for countries and the literature. Oxfam Research Report (April)Google Scholar
  35. Sy A (2014) Five questions answered on Africa’s rising economic growth. Brookings Institution (February 3). www.brookings.edu/blogs/africa-in-focus/posts/2014/02/02-africa-rising-economic-growth-sy. Accessed 2 June 2014
  36. Thomas Y, Dailami M, Dareshwar A, Kaufmann D, Kishor N, Lopez R, Wang Y (2000) The quality of growth. Oxford University Press, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. UN (2000) A better world for all. United Nations, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  38. UN High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda (2013) A new global partnership: eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. Report to the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-MoonGoogle Scholar
  39. United Nations (UN) (2014) World economic situation and prospects 2014. United Nations, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  40. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) (2013) Economic report on Africa 2013, making the most of Africa’s commodities: industrializing for growth, jobs and economic transformation. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. www.uneca.org/sites/default/files/publications/era2013_eng_fin_low.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2014
  41. World Bank (2014a) The state of the poor: where are the poor and where are they poorest? Poverty reduction and economic management (PREM). Washington DC. www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/State_of_the_poor_paper_April17.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2014
  42. World Bank (2014b) Africa’s growth set to reach 5.2 percent in 2014 with strong investment growth and household spending. Washington, DC (April 7). www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2014/04/07/. Accessed 21 June 2014
  43. World Bank (2000) World development report: attacking poverty. The World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. World Bank (2004) Poverty reduction strategy papers—progress in implementation. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  45. World Bank (2005) Pro-poor growth in the 1990s: lessons and insights from 14 countries. Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth Research Program, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. World Bank and International Monetary Fund (2005) Global monitoring report 2005. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Finance and EconomicsGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations