Skip to main content

Resettlement Planning 1948–Present

  • Chapter
Israel’s Invisible Negev Bedouin

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Geography ((BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY))

  • 700 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a detailed summary of resettlement policies and planning for the Negev Bedouin from 1948 to present, and the underlying principles and interests which frame them. The Israeli planning paradigm for the Bedouin has historically been based on territorial considerations. Most government planning policies have aimed at concentrating the Bedouin in high-density towns with defined and limited jurisdictions, which reserve inadequate land for public use and economic development. These policies are divided into three main periods. The first, described by the authors as ‘regional concentration,’ occurred in 1949, immediately after the establishment of the State of Israel. For geopolitical military considerations, the Israeli Government relocated the remaining Negev Bedouin to the Syag region, where most remain, although today some of the towns and recognized villages extend beyond this boundary. The second planning period is referred to as ‘local-urban concentration’ and began in 1964 with the building of the first Bedouin new town of Tel Sheva, followed by six others. The third planning period began in the late 1990s and includes two models. The first, a continuation of stage two, consisted of re-planning within the seven Bedouin towns. The second model, beginning in 2000, focused on the planning of localities/villages within regional councils.

Since Israel’s statehood in 1948, the question of Negev Bedouin resettlement has been on the government and public agendas. The contradictory interests and territorial needs of the Israeli Government (as manifested in policies and actions) and those of the Bedouin community have evolved. The transformations over the last six decades have been both internal and external to the Bedouin community and have changed from the government treating the Bedouin as invisible or temporary citizens to visible citizens struggling for equality and equity, and the Bedouin transformation from weak reactive responses to active responses, initiatives, and demands reflecting their needs and interests. A chronological table of government policies and Bedouin responses is followed by a more detailed focus on the policies and responses which continue to shape the current dispute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Haj, M. (1995). Kinship and modernization in developing societies: The emergence of instrumentalized kinship. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 26(3), 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, G, & Arbel, A. (2010). Bedouin encroachment in the negev: The Judge Goldberg report from a practical point of view. The Institute for Zionist Strategies. Retrieved October 17, 2010, from www.izs.org.il/eng.

  • Cabinet Resolution No. 1999, Establishment of an authority for Bedouin settlement arrangements in the Negev, 15 July 2007. Unofficial Translation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS). (2014). Statistical abstract of Israel, No. 65. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consensus Building Institute. (2006). Conflict assessment report: Development disputes in Kaseife and Um Batin (An analysis of conflicts between the Government of Israel and Bedouin stakeholders in the Negev Desert Region of Israel). Cambridge, MA: The Consensus Building Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollery, B., Burns, S., & Johnson, A. (2005). Structural reform in Australian local government: The Armidale Dumaresq-Guyra-Uralla-Walcha Strategic Alliance Model, working paper. University of New England, Retrieved from www.une.edu.au/bepp/working-papers/economics/1999-2007/econ-2005-2.pdf.

  • Goldberg Commission. (2008). Retrieved January 10, 2010, from www.moch.gov.il/NR/rdonlyres/770ABFE7–868D-4385–BE9A-96CE4323DD72/5052/DochVaadaShofetGoldbergHebrew3.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khamaisi, R. (1990). Master plan for Bedouin settlement. Beer Sheva: Association for the Assistance and Protection of the Bedouin Population (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoury J, Yagna Y (2010) Police destroy dozens of buildings in unrecognized Bedouin village in Negev, HaAretz. Retrieved July 28, 2010, from www.haaretz.com.

  • Koeller, K. (2006). The Bedouin of the Negev: A forgotten minority. Forced Migration Review, 26, 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lithwick, H. (2002). Making Bedouin towns work. Jerusalem: The Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meir, A., & Marx, E. (2005). Land, towns and planning: The Negev Bedouin and the state of Israel. Geography Research Forum, 25, 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negev Coexistence Forum for Civil Equality. (2009, August). The Bedouin-Arabs in the Negev-Naqab desert in Israel, Shadow report response to the report of the state of Israel on implementing the covenant on civil and political rights (CCPR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmueli, A. (1980). The end of nomadism: Patterns of settlement in Bedouin societies. Tel Aviv: Reshafim (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, A. (2009). The Negev as a strategic asset will be transformed into an abandoned region – Israel will become the State of Tel Aviv. In A. Dor-On (Ed.), Implementation of the Goldberg Committee Recommendations – Dangers and opportunities, land: issues in land policy (Vol. 66, pp. 17–35). Jerusalem: Land Policy and Land Use Research Institute (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, E., & Gradus, Y. (1979). Socio-cultural considerations in planning towns for nomads. Ekistics, 227, 224–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagna, Y. (2010). Israel to triple demolition rate for illegal Bedouin Construction, HaAretz. Retrieved February 18, 2010, from www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1150664.html.

  • Yahodkin, S. (2004). The unrecognized villages: Recognition and equal rights (position paper). Tel Aviv: The Regional Council for the Unrecognized Villages in the Negev, Bimkom and The Arab Center for Alternative Planning (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiftachel, O., Baruch, N., AbuSammur, S., Sheer, N., & BenArie, R. (2012). A master plan for the unrecognized Bedouin villages in the Negev, selected sections. Jerusalem: The Regional Council for the Unrecognized Villages in the Negev (RCUV) and BIMKOM Planners for Planning Rights. Updated 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zandberg, H. (2009). Land ownership dispute is not the central issue in the “Bedouin Problem”. In A. Dor-On (Ed.), Implementation of the Goldberg Committee Recommendations – Dangers and opportunities, land: Issues in land policy, No. 66. Jerusalem: Land policy and Land Use Research Institute (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shmueli, D.F., Khamaisi, R. (2015). Resettlement Planning 1948–Present. In: Israel’s Invisible Negev Bedouin. SpringerBriefs in Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16820-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics