Abstract
The third chapter starts with an explanation as to why the Brazilian sugarcane complex was selected as the case study and how the field studies were realized. Within this chapter the research design and the methodological approach are discussed and a method set in order to structure and apply the data is compiled and analyzed. Since there is no single conclusive final methodological principle as argued by a variety of economists and other social scientists, methodological pluralism is needed. Because the research focuses on innovation and technological developments as well as on the dynamic aspects of the sugarcane complex a qualitative approach is considered adequate. The dynamic nature and the reflexive, empathic and holistic character of qualitative research speak for a qualitative approach with the aim of understanding people and their opinions and not just to measure them. Qualitative research is however time- and cost-intensive and objectivity, validity as well as reliability are difficult to provide. Thus quantitative approaches or as in the case of this research, descriptive statistics and numerical data are included in order to check and review the results of qualitative research. The concept of triangulation which implies research within multiple methods and from different perspectives is referred to within this chapter in order to elucidate the advantages of combining research approaches. Thus methodological pluralism, the integration of qualitative and quantitative research approaches, is advocated within this chapter.
The ancient debates about singular or universal truths versus multiple and relative truths or extreme mixtures are still ongoing and find their place among the discussion about the three major approaches (quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods) of social research. (Johnson et al. 2007)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The section on Qualitative Content Analysis (Sect. 3.2.3) will elaborate more on this issue.
- 2.
Categories are understood as a hierarchical higher ranking classification than codes or coding which are used as synonyms. Codes are on a lower hierarchical level and are assigned to categories.
References
Bitsch, V. (2000). Agricultural economics and qualitative research: Incompatible paradigms? Qualitative Social Research, 1(1), Art. 6.
Bitsch, V. (2001). Qualitative research in agricultural economics: Paradigm, purposes and evaluation criteria. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association – Annual Meeting, Chicago.
BNEF. (2013). Mind the gap: Brazil’s looming transport fuel shortage. White Paper. Bloomberg New Energy Finance – BNEF.
Bowen, G. A. (2005). Preparing a qualitative research-based dissertation: Lessons learned. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 208–222.
Brake, A. (2011). Kombinieren, mixen, verbinden? Integration als konstitutives Element methodentriangulierender Zugänge. In J. Ecarius & I. Miethe (Eds.), Methodentriangulation in der qualitativen Bildungsforschung (pp. 41–65). Opladen: Budrich.
Bryman, A. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative research: Further reflections on their integration. In J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 57–80). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed method research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Davis, J. B. (2012). Samuels on the methodological pluralism in economics. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 30-A, 121–136.
de Moraes, M. A. F. D. (2009). Determination of the income of workers in the Brazilian sugarcane agroindustry: The role of unions. Paper presented at the VII International PENSA Conference, São Paulo, Brazil.
Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation. Eine Einführung. Qualitative Sozialforschung (Vol. 12). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Flick, U. (2007). Managing quality in qualitative research. In The SAGE qualitative research kit. SAGE Publications, London.
Flick, U. (2011). Zum Stand der Diskussion – Aktualität, Ansätze und Umsetzungen der Triangulation. In J. Ecarius & I. Miethe (Eds.), Methodentriangulation in der qualitativen Bildungsforschung (pp. 19–41). Opladen: Budrich.
Freeman, C. (1996). The greening of technology and models of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53(1), 27–39.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Habashi, J., & Worley, J. (2009). Child geopolitical agency: A mixed methods case study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(1), 42–64.
Hummerich, M., & Kramer, R.-T. (2011). „Qualitative Mehrebenenanalyse“ als triangulierendes Verfahren: Zur Methodologie von Mehrebenendesigns in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. In J. Ecarius & I. Miethe (Eds.), Methodentriangulation in der qualitativen Bildungsforschung (pp. 109–135). Opladen: Budrich.
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133.
Kaup, F., Nitsch, M., & Menezes, T. (2011). E2025: Brazil’s aspiration for a massive worldwide substitution of gasoline by 2025. International Nordic Bioenergy 2011. FINBIO publication 51, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Kern, F., & Smith, A. (2008). Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 36, 4093–4103.
Krippendorff, K. (2010). Content analysis. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Lamnek, S. (2005). Qualitative Sozialforschung: Lehrbuch. Programm PVU Psychologie Verlags Union (4th ed.). Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.
Lieberman, E. S. (2005). Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 435–452.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (1st ed.). London: SAGE.
MAPA. (2013). Anuário Estatístico da Agroenergia 2012: Statistical yearbook of agrienergy (4th ed.). Brasília: Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento – MAPA.
Mayring, P. (1985). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse. In G. Jüttemann (Ed.), Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie. Grundlagen, Verfahrensweisen, Anwendungsfelder (pp. 187–211). Weinheim: Beltz.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1, Article 20.
Meyer, D., Mytelka, L., Press, R., Dall’Oglio, E. L., De Sousa, P. T., Jr., & Grubler, A. (2012). Brazilian ethanol: Unpacking a success story of energy technology innovation. Historical case studies of energy technology innovation. In A. Grübler, F. Aguayo, K. S. Gallagher, et al. (Eds.), The global energy assessment (p. 16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neves, M. F., Pinto, M. J. A., & Conejero, M. A. (2010). Food & Ethanol. The example of Brazil. FEARP/USP. School of Economics, Business and Accountancy, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto.
Norgaard, R. (1989). The case for methodological pluralism. Ecological Economics, 1, 37–57.
Piore, M. (2004). Qualitative research: Does it fit in economics? Paper presented at the “Do facts matter in elaborating theories? Cross perspectives from economics, management, political science and sociology” – Conference, CRG-Ecole Polytechnique, Paris.
Ragin, C. C. (1997). Turning the tables: How case-oriented research challenges variable-oriented research. Comparative Social Research, 16, 27–42.
Sandelowski, M. (2003). Tables or tableaux? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 321–350). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Sarantakos, S. (2005). Social research (3rd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Seipel, C., & Rieker, P. (2003). Integrative Sozialforschung. Konzepte und Methoden der qualitativen und quantitativen empirischen Forschung. Weinheim: Juventa-Verlag.
Spetic, W., Marquez, P., & Kozak, R. (2012). Critical areas and entry points for sustainability related strategies in the sugarcane based ethanol industry of Brazil. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(6), 370–386.
Starr, M. A. (2014). Qualitative and mixed-methods research in economics: Surprising growth, promising future. J Econ Surveys, 28(2), 238–264.
Steinke, I. (2008). Gütekriterien qualitativer Forschung. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch (6th ed., p. 767). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (p. 768). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2009). Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods (2nd ed., pp. 283–317). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
UNICA. (2010). Consultation on indirect land use change impacts of biofuels. Comments by the Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association (UNICA). Brussels: UNICA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaup, F. (2015). Research Design: A Case for Methodological Pluralism. In: The Sugarcane Complex in Brazil. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16583-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16583-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16582-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16583-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)