Skip to main content

Enhancing Police Accountability in England and Wales: What Differences are Police and Crime Commissioners Making?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Police Services

Abstract

In November 2012 a new framework for the governance of police forces across England and Wales was introduced. This took the form of directly-elected Police and Crime Commissioners (PCC)s—one for each force area—in place of a governance model based on local committees of nominated local councillors and other appointees. Written 18 months later and following a series of interviews with a sample of PCCs, this chapter considers some of the key changes that have been effected under the new framework, particularly in relation to accountability. In this respect, five contrasting, and in some respects conflicting, accountability relationships of PCCs are examined in turn. While recognising the findings come too soon to draw anything more than tentative conclusions about overall impact, the chapter presents evidence which suggests that police governance in England and Wales is at least becoming more visible, more consultative and, by implication, more publicly accountable.

This chapter is a specially edited version of a longer chapter ‘Electocracy with Accountabilities? The Novel Governance Model of Police and Crime Commissioners’, in Lister S and M Rowe (eds) (2014) Policing and Accountability, London: Routledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Space here does not permit inclusion here, but several additional accountability relationships for PCCs are further explored in Raine (2014).

  2. 2.

    For example, the sample did not include a PCC who had previously served as a police officer, although nationally, about 1 in 5 of the 41 who were elected had done so. Just two of the nine PCCs were female while, as far as ethnicity was concerned, all were white.

  3. 3.

    In three of the nine cases, a senior assistant to the commissioner was also present for the interview. To protect and respect confidentiality, the nine PCCs and their areas are cited in this chapter simply as numbers (1–9 respectively).

References

  • Ashworth, R., & Skelcher, C. (2005). Meta-evaluation of the local government modernisation agenda: Progress report on accountability in local government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, S. (2013). Crime policy in an era of Austerity. Police Journal, 86(2), 102–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelli, A. M. (2012). The political economy of public sector governance. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. (2006). Principled agents? The political economy of good government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T., Briggs, I., & Willis, M. (2013). Strategic commissioning in the UK: Service improvement cycle or just going round in circles? Local Government Studies, 40(1), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, A., & Whiteman, P. (2012). Holding politicians to account? Overview and scrutiny in English local government. Public Money and Management, 32(3), 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, J. M., & Graddy, E. A. (1998). A contractual framework for new public management theory. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2008). From the neighbourhood to the national: Policing our communities together, White paper Cm 7448,The Stationery Office: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • H M Government (2010). The Coalition: Our Programme for Government, London: Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Independent Police Commission. (2013). Policing for a better Britain: Report of the independent police commission, 25th-November-2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, J. H., & Miller, G. J. (2006). Social welfare, corruption and credibility: Public management’s role in economic development. Public Management Review, 8(2), 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laville, S. (2013). Court overturns ‘irrational’ decision to suspend Lincolnshire chief constable. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, S. (2014). Scrutinising the role of the police and crime panel in the new era of police governance in England and Wales. Safer Communities, 13(1), 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, S., & Rowe, M. (2015). Electing police and crime commissioners in England and Wales: Prospecting for the democratisation of policing. Policing and Society, 1, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2012). Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the big society. Local Government Studies, 38(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayston, D. (1993). Principal, agents, and the economics of accountability in the new public sector. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 6, 68–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, T. (2013). The Stevens report, British politics and policy at LSE, Blog November 2013, London: London School of Economics; http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/54786/.

  • Raine, J. W. (2014). Electocracy with accountabilities? The novel governance model of police and crime commissioners. In S. Lister & M. Rowe (Eds.), Policing and accountability. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, J. W., & Keasey, P. (2012). From police authorities to police and crime commissioners: Might policing become more publicly accountable? International Journal of Emergency Services, 1(2), 122–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, R. W., & Meier, K. J. (1998). Principal-agent models: An expansion? Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 8, 173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., & Waterman, R. (1994). Bureaucratic dynamics: The role of bureaucracy in a democracy. Oxford: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John W. Raine BA PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raine, J. (2015). Enhancing Police Accountability in England and Wales: What Differences are Police and Crime Commissioners Making?. In: Wankhade, P., Weir, D. (eds) Police Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16568-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16568-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16567-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16568-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics