How to be a Virtuous Recipient of a Transplant Organ
This chapter investigates to what extent recipients of transplant organs ought to be held morally accountable for lifestyle choices that jeopardize the function of their new organ and, further, if recipients of transplant organs should in some cases be punished for not taking proper care of their bodies. Consider, for instance, a patient suffering from a life-threatening cardiovascular condition. The patient needs a new heart in order to survive. By prioritizing one patient in what is effectively a zero-sum game, the needs of others will be forgone. It therefore seems that it would be reasonable for the healthcare provider to have some say with regards to the lifestyle of the patient who receives transplanted biological material of which there is limited supply. How much of a say they get is, however, highly controversial.
KeywordsHealthcare Provider Transplant Organ Virtue Ethic Practical Wisdom Artificial Organ
- Fröding, B. 2012. Virtue ethics and human enhancement. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hughes, G. 2001. Routledge philosophy guidebook to Aristotle on ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kraut, R. 2006. Blackwell companion to the Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Froding, B., and M. Peterson. 2013. Why computer games can be essential for human flourishing. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society 11 (2): 81–9.Google Scholar
- Pakaluk, M. 2005. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar