Skip to main content

Local-Regional Perspective in Mega Transport Infrastructure Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mega Transport Infrastructure Planning
  • 607 Accesses

Abstract

This book is based on the research conducted in the context of Poly5, a European project promoted under the Alpine Space programme 2011–2014. The project attempts to critically deal with current approaches to the planning of European Corridors, showing all the enormous spatial criticalities of many major transport infrastructure projects (MTIPs), and with the theoretical and practical difficulties that strategic infrastructure planning inevitably raises. At the centre of Poly5 focus, there is one corridor in particular, that is, Corridor 5, now called Mediterranean Corridor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The shift from “multilevel governance”, as discussed by Faludi (2012), to what has been defined as “territorial governance” becomes explicit when incorporating strong territorial dimensions where also the spatial knowledge-related components are particularly evident and determinant. The shift from “multilevel governance” to “territorial governance” postulates, therefore, the understanding of territories and networks via processes of interaction that are specifically about the ways in which a territory develops: “only in this way, (relational) space as a social construct, as well as categories such as ‘place’ and ‘territory’ factors into multi-level governance” (Schmitt and Van Well 2013).

References

  • Brunet, R. (2002). Les lignes de l’espace européen de forces, Mappemonde. http://www.mgm.fr/PUB/Mappemonde/M202/Brunet.pdf.

  • Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC—Commission for the European Communities. (1999). European spatial development perspective: Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the EU. Office for Official Publication of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembski, S., & Salet, W. (2010). The transformative potential of institutions: How symbolic markers can institute new social meaning in changing cities. Environment and Planning A, 42, 611–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC—European Commission. (2011). Connecting Europe: The new EU core transport network. Brussels, 19 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhard, K., & Dross, M. (2013). Step by step designing a spatial strategy. Final report of the Poly5 Work Package 4. Technical University of Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbro, S., & Brunello, L. (2012). Scenarios for the Veneto Region identified by TEKNOSS (Territorial Knowledge Sharing System). Final report of the Poly5 Work Package 4. University of Udine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbro, S., & Mesolella, A. (2010). Multilevel spatial visions and territorial cohesion: Italian Regional Planning between the TEN-T Corridors, ESDP Polycentrism and Governmental “Strategic Platforms”. Planning Practice and Research, 1360–0583, 25(1), 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabbro, S., Brunello, L., & Dean, M. (2015). Re-framing large transport infrastructure plans: A study on European corridors with a focus on North-Eastern Italy. International Planning Studies. online publication, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, A. (2012). Multi-level (Territorial) governance: Three criticisms. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, A., & Waterhout, B. (2002). The making of the European spatial development perspective: No masterplan (RTPI Library Series). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk—An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1982). Great planning disasters. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jogan, I., Garramone, V., & Alberti, F. (2012). Ripensare la montagna nel web 3.0, soluzioni di e-government e knowledge management per gli interventi locali people-centred in ambito montano. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzmann, K., & Wegener, M. (1991). The pattern of Urbanisation in Western Europe 1960–1990, Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung, n. 28, Institut für Raumplanung, Universitët Dortmund, Dortmund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. (2013). Planning major infrastructure: A critical analysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIT—Mistero delle Infrastrutture e del Trasporto. (2007). DPEF 2008–2012 Allegato E Piattaforme Territoriali Transnazionali: schede di diagnosi strategica. http://www.mit.gov.it/mit/mop_all.php?p_id=04044 (page 13).

  • Olesen, K. (2013). Strategic spatial planning’s role in legitimizing investment in transport infrastructure. Paper presented at the AESOP-ACSP Joint Congress, Dublin, 15–16 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priemus, H. (2007). Development and design of large infrastructure projects: Disregarded alternatives and issues of spatial planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(4), 626–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, F. L. (1998). Linking Europe: Transport policies and politics in the European Union. Westport: Praeger Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salet, W., Bertolini, L., & Giezen, M. (2013). Complexity and uncertainty: Problem or asset in decision making of mega infrastructure projects? In International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(6), 1984–2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzmann, A. (2013). Visioneering: Planning tool with the phenomenological approach. In: Tracking the Ljubljana Urban Region. International Student Workshop, pp. 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, P., & Van Well, L. (2013). Territorial governance across Europe. Paper presented at the AESOP-ACSP Joint Congress, Dublin, 15–19 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yai, T. (2013). A framework of three parallel planning process for spatial and infrastructure plan. Paper presented at the AESOP-ACSP Joint Congress, Dublin, 15–16 July.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandro Fabbro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fabbro, S. (2015). Local-Regional Perspective in Mega Transport Infrastructure Planning. In: Fabbro, S. (eds) Mega Transport Infrastructure Planning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16396-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16396-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16395-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16396-3

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics