Advertisement

Towards Automated Filtering of the Medial Axis Using the Scale Axis Transform

Conference paper
  • 469 Downloads
Part of the Association for Women in Mathematics Series book series (AWMS, volume 1)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the problem of determining the optimal scaling to prune the medial axis of spurious branches with the use of the Scale Axis Transform (SAT) in \(\mathbb{R}^{2}\). This optimal scaling is found by minimizing the Fréchet distance between the boundary of the true shape and the boundary of the SAT-filtered version of the shape perturbed by noise. To compute the minimum, the noisy shape is filtered using a variety of scalings s > 1 of the SAT algorithm. The optimal scaling is then related to the level of noise used to perturb the true shape. The minimization problem is repeated for various shapes and different noise levels. In applications such as image recognition and registration, the medial axis is very relevant. However, it is highly susceptible to noise along the boundary. The results presented here offer crucial information to automate the de-noising process, by providing a link between the level of noise and the optimal SAT scaling factor.

Keywords

Medial Axis Original Shape Shape Boundary Optimal Scaling True Shape 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Alt, H., Godau, M.: Computing the Fréchet distance between two polygonal curves. Int. J. Comput. Geom. Appl. 5, 75–91 (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amenta, N., Choi, S., Kolluri, R.K.: The power crust. In: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications, Ann Arbor pp. 249–266. ACM (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Attali, D., Montanvert, A.: Computing and simplifying 2D and 3D continuous skeletons. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 67(3), 261–273 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beg, M.F., Miller, M.I., Trouvé, A., Younes, L.: Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 61(2), 139–157 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buchin, K., Buchin, M., Wenk, C.: Computing the Fréchet distance between simple polygons in polynomial time. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (SCG ’06), Sedona, pp. 80–87. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chazal, F., Lieutier, A.: The λ-medial axis. Graph. Models 67(4), 304–331 (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feragen, A., Lauze, F., Lo, P., de Bruijne, M., Nielsen, M.: Geometries on spaces of treelike shapes. In: Computer Vision–ACCV 2010, Queenstown, pp. 160–173. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feragen, A., Owen, M., Petersen, J., Wille, M.M., Thomsen, L.H., Dirksen, A., de Bruijne, M.: Tree-space statistics and approximations for large-scale analysis of anatomical trees. In: Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Asilomar, pp. 74–85. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giesen, J., Miklos, B., Pauly, M., Wormser, C.: The scale axis picture show. In: ACM Video/Multimedia Session of Symposium of Computational Geometry (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giesen, J., Miklos, B., Pauly, M., Wormser, C.: The scale axis transform. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, Aarhus, pp. 106–115. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klein, A., Andersson, J., Ardekani, B.A., Ashburner, J., Avants, B., Chiang, M.C., Christensen, G.E., Collins, D.L., Gee, J., Hellier, P., et al.: Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 46(3), 786–802 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leonard, K.: An efficiency criterion for 2D shape model selection. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New York, vol. 1, pp. 1289–1296. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leonard, K.: Efficient shape modeling: entropy, adaptive coding, and boundary curves-vs-Blum’s medial axis. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 74(2), 183–199 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lieutier, A.: Any open bounded subset of \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\) has the same homotopy type as its medial axis. Comput. Aided Design 36(11), 1029–1046 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, L., Chambers, E.W., Letscher, D., Ju, T.: Extended grassfire transform on medial axes of 2D shapes. Comput. Aided Design 43(11), 1496–1505 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mederos, B., Amenta, N., Velho, L., de Figueiredo, L.H.: Surface reconstruction for noisy point clouds. In: Symposium on Geometry Processing, Vienna, pp. 53–62. Citeseer (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miklós, B.: The scale axis transform. Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zürich (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miklós, B., Giesen, J., Pauly, M.: Medial axis approximation from inner Voronoi balls: a demo of the Mesecina tool. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, Gyeongju. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miklos, B., Giesen, J., Pauly, M.: Discrete scale axis representations for 3D geometry. ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 29(4), 101 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mumford, D., Shah, J.: Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 42, 577–685 (1989)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sebastian, T., Klein, P., Kimia, B.: Recognition of shapes by editing shock graphs. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Vancouver, vol. 1, pp. 755–755. IEEE Computer Society (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sebastian, T.B., Klein, P.N., Kimia, B.B.: Recognition of shapes by editing their shock graphs. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26(5), 550–571 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shaked, D., Bruckstein, A.M.: Pruning medial axes. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 69(2), 156–169 (1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Siddiqi, K., Shokoufandeh, A., Dickinson, S.J., Zucker, S.W.: Shock graphs and shape matching. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 35(1), 13–32 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland & The Association for Women in Mathematics 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations