Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Wibke ErdmannEmail author
  • Dieter Kelletat
  • Anja Scheffers
  • Simon K. Haslett
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Geography book series (BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY)
To explain the field evidence of coastal boulder dislocation and forms of deposits combined, we need an explanation (or at least a hypothesis) which must incorporate
  • the exceptional size of dislocated boulders;

  • their exceptional distance deposited from the coastline in exceptionally high elevations (in a worldwide comparison);

  • the ridge contours often not adapted to the coastal and cliff contours;

  • the organization of imbrication and imbrication trains with boulders around 50 tons;

  • over-wash features, also behind the main boulder ridge;

  • the associated secondary forms of ripples and ripple-like ridge segments on the main ridge or forming the main ridge;

  • the wide time span of data from boring bivalves in large boulders and from stratified shell hash in and immediately at the ridges;

  • the existence of similar forms and boulder size along different exposures and bathymetries;

  • a reasonable quote for shoreline and cliff recession in accordance to historical and/or archaeological facts, such as...

Keywords

Tsunami Deposit Tsunami Source Storm Wave Main Ridge Northern Atlantic Ocean 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbott DH, Gerard-Little P, Sa Coste, St Coste, Breger D, Haslett SK (2010) Exotic grains in a core from Cornwall, NY—do they have an impact source? J Siberian Fed Univ, Eng Technol 3(1):5–29Google Scholar
  2. Baillie M (2007) The case for significant numbers of extraterrestrial impacts through the late Holocene. J Quat Sci 22:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryant EA, Haslett SK (2007) Catastrophic wave erosion, Bristol Channel, United Kingdom: impact of tsunami? J Geol 115:253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant E, Haslett SK, Scheffers S, Scheffers A, Kelletat D (2010) Tsunami chronology supporting late Holocene impacts. J Siberian Fed Univ, Eng Technol 3(1):63–71Google Scholar
  5. Cox R, Zentner DB, Kirchner BJ, Cook MS (2012) Boulder ridges on the Aran Islands (Ireland): recent movements caused by storm waves, not tsunamis. J Geol 120:249–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haslett SK, Bryant EA (2007) Evidence for historic coastal high-energy wave impact (tsunami?) in North Wales, United Kingdom. Atlantic Geol 43:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Scheffers A, Scheffers S, Kelletat D, Browne T (2009) Wave-emplaced coarse debris and megaclasts in Ireland and Scotland: boulder transport in a high energy littoral environment. J Geol 117:553–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Scheffers A, Kelletat D, Haslett SK, Scheffers S, Browne T (2010) Coastal boulder deposits in Galway Bay and the Aran Islands, western Ireland. Z Geomorp 54:247–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Williams DM, Hall AM (2004) Cliff–top megaclast deposits of Ireland, a record of extreme waves in the North Atlantic—storms or tsunamis? Mar Geol 206:101–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zentner D (2009) Geospatial, hydrodynamic, and field evidence for the storm–wave emplacement of boulder ridges on the Aran Islands, Ireland. Williams College, WilliamstownGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wibke Erdmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dieter Kelletat
    • 1
  • Anja Scheffers
    • 2
  • Simon K. Haslett
    • 3
  1. 1.Seminar for Geography and EducationUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  2. 2.Southern Cross GeoScienceSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  3. 3.Coastal and Marine Research GroupUniversity of WalesCardiffUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations