Abstract
Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) has become a powerful tool for social scientists due to its inexpensiveness, ease of use, and ability to attract large numbers of workers. While the subject pool is diverse, there are numerous questions regarding the composition of the workers as a function of when the “Human Intelligence Task”(HIT) is posted. Given the “queue” nature of HITs and the disparity in geography of participants, it is natural to wonder whether HIT posting time/day can have an impact on the population that is sampled. We address this question using a panel survey on AMT and show (surprisingly) that except for gender, there is no statistically significant difference in terms of demographics characteristics as a function of HIT posting time.
Keywords
- Survey Response
- Panel Survey
- Subject Pool
- Inverse Gaussian Distribution
- Validation Code
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berinsky, A.J., Huber, G.A., Lenz, G.S.: Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis 20(3), 351–368 (2012). http://pan.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/3/351
Chilton, L.B., Horton, J.J., Miller, R.C., Azenkot, S.: Task search in a human computation market. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation, HCOMP 2010, pp. 1–9. ACM, New York (2010). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1837885.1837889
Crump, M.J.C., McDonnell, J.V., Gureckis, T.M.: Evaluating amazon’s mechanical turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS ONE 8(3), e57410 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057410
Henrich, J., Heine, S.J., Norenzayan, A.: The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2–3), 61–83; discussion 83–135 (2010)
Hogg, T., Lerman, K., Smith, L.M.: Stochastic models predict user behavior in social media. HUMAN 2(1), 25–39 (2013). http://ojs.scienceengineering.org/index.php/human/article/view/72
Horton, J.J., Rand, D.G., Zeckhauser, R.J.: The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics 14, 399–425 (2011)
Huberman, B.A., Pirolli, P.L.T., Pitkow, J.E., Lukose, R.M.: Strong regularities in world wide web surfing. Science 280(5360), 95–97 (1998). http://www.sciencemag.org/content/280/5360/95
Komarov, S., Reinecke, K., Gajos, K.Z.: Crowdsourcing performance evaluations of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2013, pp. 207–216. ACM, New York (2013). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2470654.2470684
Lease, M., Hullman, J., Bigham, J.P., Bernstein, M.S., Kim, J., Lasecki, W., Bakhshi, S., Mitra, T., Miller, R.C.: Mechanical turk is not anonymous. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2228728, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, March 2013. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2228728
Mason, W., Suri, S.: Conducting behavioral research on amazon’s mechanical turk. Behavior Research Methods 44(1), 1–23 (2012). http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
Oppenheimer, D.M., Meyvis, T., Davidenko, N.: Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(4), 867–872 (2009). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103109000766
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J.: Inside the turk understanding mechanical turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science 23(3), 184–188 (2014). http://cdp.sagepub.com/content/23/3/184
Rand, D.G.: The promise of mechanical turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. Journal of Theoretical Biology 299, 172–179 (2012). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519311001330
Shapiro, D.N., Chandler, J., Mueller, P.A.: Using mechanical turk to study clinical populations. Clinical Psychological Science 1(2), 213–220 (2013). http://cpx.sagepub.com/content/1/2/213
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lakkaraju, K. (2015). A Study of Daily Sample Composition on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In: Agarwal, N., Xu, K., Osgood, N. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction. SBP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9021. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16268-3_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16268-3_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16267-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16268-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)