Skip to main content

Analysis of Music Tagging and Listening Patterns: Do Tags Really Function as Retrieval Aids?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction (SBP 2015)

Abstract

In collaborative tagging systems, it is generally assumed that users assign tags to facilitate retrieval of content at a later time. There is, however, little behavioral evidence that tags actually serve this purpose. Using a large-scale dataset from the social music website Last.fm, we explore how patterns of music tagging and subsequent listening interact to determine if there exist measurable signals of tags functioning as retrieval aids. Specifically, we describe our methods for testing if the assignment of a tag tends to lead to an increase in listening behavior. Results suggest that tagging, on average, leads to only very small increases in listening rates, and overall the data do not support the assumption that tags generally serve as retrieval aids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames, M., Naaman, M.: Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 971–980. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cattuto, C., Loreto, V., Pietronero, L.: Semiotic dynamics and collaborative tagging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(5), 1461–1464 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Glushko, R.J., Maglio, P.P., Matlock, T., Barsalou, L.W.: Categorization in the wild. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(4), 129–135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Golder, S.A., Huberman, B.A.: Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science 32(2), 198–208 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta, M., Li, R., Yin, Z., Han, J.: Survey on social tagging techniques. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 12(1), 58–72 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Halpin, H., Robu, V., Shepherd, H.: The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 211–220. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hastie, T.J., Tibshirani, R.J.: Generalized additive models (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heckner, M., Heilemann, M., Wolff, C.: Personal information management vs. resource sharing: towards a model of information behavior in social tagging systems. In: ICWSM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Schmitz, C., Stumme, G.: Information retrieval in folksonomies: search and ranking. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 411–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Körner, C., Kern, R., Grahsl, H.P., Strohmaier, M.: Of categorizers and describers: an evaluation of quantitative measures for tagging motivation. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 157–166. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lorince, J., Todd, P.M.: Can simple social copying heuristics explain tag popularity in a collaborative tagging system? In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, pp. 215–224. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lorince, J., Zorowitz, S., Murdock, J., Todd, P.M.: “Supertagger” behavior in building folksonomies. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, pp. 129–138. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., Davis, M.: HT 2006, tagging paper, taxonomy, flickr, academic article, to read. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 31–40. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vander Wal, T.: Explaining and Showing Broad and Narrow Folksonomies (2005). http://www.vanderwal.net/random/entrysel.php?blog=1635

  15. Vander Wal, T.: Folksonomy Coinage and Definition (2007). http://vanderwal.net/folksonomy.html

  16. Wood, S.N.: mgcv: GAMs and generalized ridge regression for R. R News 1(2), 20–25 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yeung, C.M.A., Noll, M.G., Gibbins, N., Meinel, C., Shadbolt, N.: SPEAR: Spamming-Resistant Expertise Analysis and Ranking in Collaborative Tagging Systems. Computational Intelligence 27(3), 458–488 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zollers, A.: Emerging motivations for tagging: expression, performance, and activism. In: Workshop on Tagging and Metadata for Social Information Organization, held at the 16th International World Wide Web Conference (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared Lorince .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lorince, J., Joseph, K., Todd, P.M. (2015). Analysis of Music Tagging and Listening Patterns: Do Tags Really Function as Retrieval Aids?. In: Agarwal, N., Xu, K., Osgood, N. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction. SBP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9021. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16268-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16268-3_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16267-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16268-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics