A Pilot of 3D Printing of Medical Devices in Haiti

  • A. Dara DotzEmail author
Conference paper


3D printers are small-scale manufacturing facilities in a box. With minimal resources, they enable rapid on-demand production. Cost-effective complex products are made when needed with decreased transportation, storage, and customs costs. The immediate access to medical devices created by 3D printing reduces uncertainty and delivery delays. This paper introduces a pilot project to collaborate with local clinicians and design medical devices with a 3D printer in Haiti. The pilot aimed to empirically ascertain whether locally engaged staff could implement 3D printing of medical devices. This process may be replicated globally and brought to other areas of need. On multiple occasions, we visited three healthcare delivery sites in Haiti. By observing and interviewing medical staff, we identified high-demand supplies with the potential for 3D printed fabrication. We also identified equipments not used due to broken parts that could be easily fabricated. In collaboration with local clinicians, we developed a list of 16 3D printable objects to meet the localized demand in real time. 3DPforHealth launched a 3D printing lab in Haiti and trained local people in design using the Makerbot Rep 1 printers. To demonstrate 3D printing medical application, we collaboratively designed an umbilical cord clamp prototype. Variants of the clamp design were iteratively tested to assure durability and efficacy of grip on multiple materials. The process identified initial concerns of printing medical devices including sanitation, product longevity, reuse of retired materials for new product development, and parameters for responsible human trials. Initial trials demonstrate proof of concept for identification and 3D printed production of much-needed medical devices by collaborating with local clinicians. Further, we were able to train local people in 3D printing design. In recent months, 3DPforHealth has been absorbed into a larger initiative for disaster response manufacturing known as Field Ready ( We envision Field Ready as a replicable model for countries struggling with similar challenges. Field Ready is now a program that designs solutions that are shared with other resource-constrained environments, bypassing infrastructure and distribution limitations globally.


Medical Device International Space Station Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Local Clinician Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Blencowe, H., Lawn, J., Vandelaer, J., Roper, M., & Cousens, S. (2010). Tetanus toxoid immunization to reduce mortality from neonatal tetanus. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39(1): Suppl 1:i102-9). doi:  10.1093/ije/dyq027.
  2. Buss, T. F. (2008). Haiti in the balance: Why foreign aid has failed and what we can do about it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press and the National Academy of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  3. Chu, K., Stokes, C., Trelles, M., & Ford, N. (2011). Improving effective surgical delivery in humanitarian disasters: Lessons from Haiti. PLoS Medicine, 8(4), e1001025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farmer, P., Robin, S., Ramilus, S. L., & Kim, J. Y. (1991). Tuberculosis, poverty, and “compliance”: lessons from rural Haiti. Seminars in Respiratory Infections, 6(4), 254–260.Google Scholar
  5. Garner, P., Lai, D., Baea, M., Edwards, K., & Heywood, P. (1994). Avoiding neonatal death: An intervention study of umbilical cord care. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 40(1), 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Global Health Observatory (GHO). (2013). World health statistics. Accessed 1 Feb 2014.
  7. Ibrahim, C. P. (2008). Hypotension in preterm infants. Indian Pediatrics, 45(4), 285–294.Google Scholar
  8. Kickstarter. (2013). Filabot: Plastic filament maker. Accessed 12 Dec 2013.
  9. Krin, C. S., Giannou, C., Seppelt, I. M., Walker, S., Mattox, K. L., et al. (2010). Appropriate response to humanitarian crises. BMJ, 340, c562. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lancet. (2010). Growth of aid and the decline of humanitarianism. Lancet, 375(9711), 253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60110-9.
  11. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). (2014). Haiti overview. Accessed 1 Feb 2014.
  12. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). (2011). Haiti one year after: Looking ahead—plans and perspectives. Accessed 1 Mar 2014.
  13. Popsci. (2014). West African inventor makes a $100 3D printer from e-waste. Accessed 1 Dec 2014.
  14. Rupar, E., Hussain, S., &King, S. (2013). Making poverty history winter 2012: Part 2 where is your money going? Examining post crisis aid relief in Haiti. Accessed 1 Dec 2013.
  15. Sloand, E., Ho, G., & Kub, J. (2013). Experiences of nurse volunteers in Haiti after the 2010 earthquake. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 27(3), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith, R. M., Dyer, G. S. M., Antonangeli, K., Arredondo, N., Bedlion, H., Dalal, A., et al. (2012). Disaster triage after the Haitian earthquake. Injury, 43(11), 1811–1815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. UNICEF. (2014). Elimination of maternal and neonatal tetanus. Accessed 1 Feb 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Field ReadyPort-au-PrinceHaiti

Personalised recommendations