Advertisement

Tools to Measure the Development Impact of Innovations

  • Ashok J. GadgilEmail author
  • Temina Madon
Conference paper

Abstract

Measuring the social and economic impacts of a product or service is a challenge in any context, but particularly among low-income communities. These contexts often lack the infrastructure, institutions, and investment required to assess the long-term benefits and risks of a new healthcare device, sanitation solution, or irrigation technology. Recent innovations in measurement are addressing this challenge. Increasingly, researchers are using sensors, satellites, and mobile platforms to automatically or remotely capture rich, finely resolved data from households and communities. There also is growing use of field experiments—adapted from clinical science—to study the changes introduced by a product’s distribution and use. These tools and techniques are enabling researchers to credibly demonstrate the outcomes of development interventions; they are also generating durable lessons about household demand for products and services. More broadly, they inform the process of technology innovation for development—by providing insights into what works, and what does not.

Keywords

Mobile Telephony Mobile Phone Data User Welfare Clinical Trial Methodology mHealth Application 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alspaugh, S., Ganapathi, A., Hearst, M. A., & Katz, R. (2014). Better logging to improve interactive data analysis tools. In KDD Workshop on Interactive Data Exploration and Analytics (IDEA). http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~alspaugh/papers/alspaugh-idea2014-final.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  2. Bound, J., Brown, C., & Mathiowetz, N. (2001). Measurement error in survey data. In J.J. Heckman & E.E. Leamer (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (vol. 5, pp. 3705–3843). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Chang, A., Tilahun, L., & Breazeal, C. (2014). Visualisations of data from the literacy tablet reading project in rural Ethiopia. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2014). London, 8–10 July. http://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/ewic_ev14_s9paper2.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  4. Clasen, T., Fabini, D., Boisson, S., Taneja, J., Song, J., Aichinger, E., et al. (2012). Making sanitation count: Developing and testing a device for assessing latrine use in low-income settings. Environmental Science and Technology, 46(6), 3295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Das, A., & Roy, J. (2014). From field experiences on arsenic mitigation technology deployment strategy in India. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  6. Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kremer, M. (2007). Using randomization in development economics research: A toolkit. Centre for Economic Policy Research Great Britain, National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/t0333.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  7. Dupas, P. (2014). Short-run subsidies and long-run adoption of new health products: Evidence from a field experiment. Econometrica, 82(1), 197–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jensen, R. (2007). The digital provide: Information (technology), market performance, and welfare in the South Indian Fisheries Sector. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 879–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kremer, M., Miguel, E., Mullainathan, S., Null, C., & Zwane, A. P. (2011). Social engineering: Evidence from a suite of take-up experiments in Kenya. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  10. Ruiz-Mercado, I., Masera, O., Zamora, H., & Smith, K. R. (2011). Adoption and sustained use of improved cookstoves. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7557–7566.Google Scholar
  11. Thomas, E. A., Zumr, Z., Graf, J., Wick, C. A., McCellan, J. H., Imam, Z., et al. (2013). Remotely accessible instrumented monitoring of global development programs: Technology development and validation. Sustainability, 5(8), 3288–3301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA)University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations