Facilitating Adoption of a Private Sector Led Open Innovation Approach to Rural Sanitation Marketing in Bangladesh

  • F. Conor RiggsEmail author
  • Chetan Kaanadka
Conference paper


In rural Bangladesh, the need for wider distribution of accessible, customer-oriented improved sanitation facilities for low-income communities has never been greater. Yet the market for affordable sanitation products in rural Bangladesh is fundamentally characterized by a lack of formal commercial linkages between sanitation entrepreneurs (SE) and commercial lead firms (LF) with scalable, sustainable, and dynamic products and business models. Encouraging LFs to adopt an open innovation approach by developing business models that generate a “living lab” environment represents a promising direction to increase the capacity of SEs to provide improved products and services to low-income consumers in a sustainable manner. Utilizing a Human-Centered Design (HCD) methodology, the Bangladesh SanMark Pilot (BSMP) project (2012–2014) implemented by iDE aimed to develop a living lab outcome for LFs and SEs in Rajshahi District, Bangladesh that was underpinned by business model that would encourage LFs to actively engage with SEs in Bangladesh for the design and development of context-appropriate sanitation products and services. By its conclusion, the project supported the development of an upgradeable latrine product that reached over 28,000 people in 9 months. The positive feedback loop created through this “living lab business model” encouraged the LF to manufacture a mass-producible version of the latrine product from 2015, channeled through a fully commercial business model that formally links SEs to the large-scale marketing and distribution infrastructure of the LF as retailers that is grounded in continual interaction with formerly disconnected SEs and local government institutions.


Business Model Open Innovation Open Defecation Lead Firm Sanitation Product 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arnkil, R., Koski, P., Järvensivu, A., & Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring quadruple helix—Outlining user-oriented innovation models. Working Papers 85/2010. University of Tampere, Work Research Centre.Google Scholar
  2. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Ihlström Eriksson, C., Ståhlbröst, A., & Svensson, J. (2009). A milieu for innovation-defining living labs. Paper presented at the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium—Stimulating Recovery—The Role of Innovation Management, New York, December 6–9, 2009.Google Scholar
  3. Boudreau, K. J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2009). How to manage outside innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 69–76.Google Scholar
  4. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chowdhry, S., & Kone, D. (2012). Business analysis of fecal sludge management: Emptying and transportation services in Africa and Asia. Resource Document. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Accessed February 18, 2014.
  6. Devine, J., & Kullman, C. (2011). Introductory guide to sanitation marketing. Resource Document. Water and Sanitation Program. Accessed 11 January 2014.
  7. Følstad, A. (2008). Towards a living lab for the development of online community services. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organisations and Networks, 10, 48–58.Google Scholar
  8. Gero, A., Carrard, N., Murta, J., & Willetts, J. (2013). Private and social enterprise engagement in water and sanitation for the poor: A systematic review of current evidence. Resource Document. Sydney: Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology. Accessed March 12, 2014.
  9. Holst, M., Ståhlbröst, A., & Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. (2010). Openness in living labs: Facilitating innovation. In Proceedings of the 33rd IRIS Seminar.Google Scholar
  10. IDEO. (2011). Human centered design toolkit. Resource Document. Accessed January 7, 2014.
  11. Markopoulos, P., & Rauterberg, G. W. M. (2000). Living lab: A white paper. In IPO Annual Progress Report 35.Google Scholar
  12. Narracott, A. & Norman, G. (2011). Clean team, a human-centred approach to sanitation: Initial trails in Ghana. Resource Document. Water and Sanitation for the Urban Poor (WSUP). Accessed March 18, 2014.
  13. Pedi, D., Kov, P., & Smets, S. (2012). Sanitation marketing lessons from Cambodia: A market-based approach to sanitation. Resource Document. Water and Sanitation Program. Accessed January 7, 2014.
  14. Rosenboom, J. W., Jacks, C., Phyrum, K., Roberts, M., & Baker, T. (2011). Sanitation marketing in Cambodia. Waterlines, 30(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Salter, D. (2008). Identifying constraints to increase sanitation coverage: Sanitation demand and supply in Cambodia. Resource Document. Water and Sanitation Program. Accessed February 12, 2014.
  16. Ståhlbröst, A. (2008). Forming future IT - the living lab way of user involvement. Dissertation, Luleå University of Technology.Google Scholar
  17. Sy, J., Warner, R., & Jamieson, J. (2013). Tapping the markets: Opportunities for domestic investments in sanitation for the poor. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  18. USAID (2009). In-depth Supply Assessment. Report for the Sanitation Marketing Pilot—Tororo District Uganda. Resource Document. USAID. Accessed March 22, 2014.
  19. Vanhaverbeke, W., Van de Vrande, V., & Chesbrough, H. (2008). Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate venturing in terms of real options. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(4), 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. WHO/UNICEF (2013). Progress on sanitation and drinking water: 2013 update. Resource Document. World Health Organization. Accessed March 3, 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Development Enterprises (iDE)DhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations