Skip to main content

Institutional Trust: An Introduction

  • Chapter

Part of the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation book series (NSM,volume 62)

Abstract

Trust in institutions—also known as institutional trust—is essential to a variety of matters, ranging from the functioning of democracy to assuring the effective operations of the courts to agreeing to cooperate with the police to deciding whether to patronize a business. Although trust in institutions is inextricably intertwined with trust between and among individuals, this volume focuses on trust in institutions, not trust in others per se. In this introductory chapter to the 62nd annual volume of the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, we briefly discuss the various contexts in which trust is involved and set the stage for a more detailed and extensive treatment of trust theory and research by eight eminent scholars from the U.S. and beyond. In addition to general background on trust, this chapter provides a brief overview of the eight remaining chapters in the book.

Keywords

  • Institutional trust
  • Interpersonal trust
  • Legitimacy
  • Justice
  • Motivation
  • Emotion
  • Interdisciplinary

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16151-8_1
  • Chapter length: 11 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-16151-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.1

Notes

  1. 1.

    Of some interest is that although those who trust Justice Ginsburg might seem to be different people than those who trust Justice Scalia, these two justices apparently delight and trust in one another quite deeply, despite their ideological and jurisprudential differences (Rosen, 2007).

References

  • American Academy of Arts and Sciences. (2013). ARISE II: Unleashing America’s research and innovation enterprise. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.amacad.org/arise2/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, R., & Zaheer, A. (2006). Handbook of trust research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, R., & Zaheer, A. (2013). Handbook of advances in trust research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, B. H. (in press). Law and social science: How interdisciplinary is interdisciplinary enough? In C. Willis-Esqueda & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), The witness stand and Lawrence S. Wrightsman, Jr. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2011). Justice, trust, and trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1183–1206.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & Lepine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909–927.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. C. (2010). Trust in risk management: A model-based review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 30, 541–574.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gastil, J., Deess, E. P., Weiser, P. J., & Simmons, C. (2010). The jury and democracy: How jury deliberation promotes civic engagement and political participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 479–514.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. A. (2005). Handbook of organizational justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, J. A., PytlikZillig, L. M., Herian, M. N., Bornstein, B. H., Tomkins, A. J., & Hoffman, L. (2013). Deconstructing confidence in state courts. Journal of Trust Research, 3, 11–20.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, J. A., PtylikZillig, L. M., Tomkins, A. J., Herian, M. N., Bornstein, B. H., & Neeley, E. M. (2011). Exploring separable components of institutional confidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 95–115.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. (2007). Toward an interdisciplinary conceptualization of trust: A typological approach. Management and Organization Review, 3, 421–445.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, F., Möllering, G., & Saunders, M. N. K. (2012). Handbook of research methods on trust. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011). Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1, 23–63.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, P. C., & Miller, J. L. (2014). After violent conflict: Justice, well-being, and international criminal courts. In B. H. Bornstein & R. L. Wiener (Eds.), Justice, conflict and wellbeing: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 197–221). New York, NY: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Möllering, G. (2006). Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möllering, G. (2014). Trust, calculativeness, and relationships: A special issue 20 years after Williamson’s warning. Journal of Trust Research, 4(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, J. (2007). The nine: Inside the secret world of the Supreme Court. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32, 344–354.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shockley, E., Neal, T., PytlikZillig, L., & Bornstein, B. H. (in press). Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Carter, N. T. (2014). Declines in trust in others and confidence in institutions among American adults and late adolescents, 1972-2012. Psychological Science, 25, 1914–1923.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 453–486.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316, 1036–1039.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian H. Bornstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bornstein, B.H., Tomkins, A.J. (2015). Institutional Trust: An Introduction. In: Bornstein, B., Tomkins, A. (eds) Motivating Cooperation and Compliance with Authority. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol 62. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16151-8_1

Download citation