Scenario Planning Case Studies Using Open Government Data

Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 448)


The opportunity for improved decision making has been enhanced in recent years through the public availability of a wide variety of information. In Australia, government data is routinely made available and maintained in the repository. This is a single point of reference for data that can be reused for purposes beyond that originally considered by the data custodians. Similarly a wealth of citizen information is available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Combining this data allows informed decisions to be made through planning scenarios.

We present two case studies that demonstrate the utility of data integration and web mapping. As a simple proof of concept the user can explore different scenarios in each case study by indicating the relative weightings to be used for the decision making process. Both case studies are demonstrated as a publicly available interactive map-based website.


urban planning environmental planning decision support government data public transport 


  1. 1.
    Tanser, F., Gething, P., Atkinson, P.: Location-allocation Planning. In: A Companion to Health and Medical Geography, pp. 540–566. Wiley-Blackwell (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tsai, Y.S., Ko, P.C.I., Huang, C.Y., Wen, T.H.: Optimizing locations for the installation of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in urban public streets through the use of spatial and temporal weighting schemes. Applied Geography 35, 394–404 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chan, T.C.Y., Li, H., Lebovic, G., Tang, S.K., Chan, J.Y.T., Cheng, H.C.K., Morrison, L.J., Brooks, S.C.: Identifying locations for public access defibrillators using mathematical optimization. Circulation 127, 1801 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., Sarkis, J., Ross, A.: Efficient service location design in government services: A decision support system framework. Journal of Operations Management 23, 163–178 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCall, M.K., Dunn, C.E.: Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’ governance? Geoforum 43, 81–94 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noor, A.M., Amin, A.A., Gething, P.W., Atkinson, P.M., Hay, S.I., Snow, R.W.: Modelling distances travelled to government health services in Kenya. Tropical Medicine & International Health 11, 188–196 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moilanen, A., Wilson, K.A., Possingham, H.P.: Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bryan, B.A., Crossman, N.D., King, D., Meyer, W.S.: Landscape futures analysis: Assessing the impacts of environmental targets under alternative spatial policy options and future scenarios. Environmental Modelling & Software 26, 83–91 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Power, R., Robinson, B., Rudd, L.: Planning the Future Face to Face Service Delivery Footprint. CSIRO Australia (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIROCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations