Skip to main content

Acute Coronary Syndromes: Introduction and Pathophysiologic Classification

  • Chapter
Pathophysiology and Pharmacotherapy of Cardiovascular Disease

Abstract

Several different classifications of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) exist, and most of them are based on the electrocardiogram (ECG). Based on differences in pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome, ACS are classified as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-elevation MI, and unstable angina. STEMI is the most urgent subtype of ACS, because it is believed to reflect acute ongoing transmural myocardial ischemia caused by acute coronary occlusion. Based on changes in the different parts of the ECG, ACS patients may be classified according to the extent of the ischemic process or myocardial injury, the acuteness of the disease process, and the severity of myocardial ischemia. In the majority of patients, ACS classification is rather straightforward, but some controversial issues remain to be solved in the future. The role of different ACS subtypes regarding choice of medication also needs to be explored more in detail. This chapter reviews pathophysiological mechanisms explaining the different ECG patterns encountered in ACS; the different ECG manifestations are also presented by illustrative figures. Both established guidelines and ECG-based expert reports for the classification of ACS are presented. Unresolved, controversial issues regarding ECG manifestations of ACS are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Chesebro JH. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (1). N Engl J Med. 1992;326:242–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined–a consensus document of the joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:959–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kovacic JC, Fuster V. From treating complex coronary artery disease to promoting cardiovascular health: therapeutic transitions and challenges, 2010–2020. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;90:509–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reichlin T, Twerenbold R, Reiter M, et al. Introduction of high-sensitivity troponin assays: impact on myocardial infarction incidence and prognosis. Am J Med. 2012;125:1205–13.e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1581–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crea F, Liuzzo G. Pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Libby P. Mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes and their implications for therapy. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2004–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bentzon JF, Otsuka F, Virmani R, Falk E. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res. 2014;114:1852–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Falk E, Nakano M, Bentzon JF, Finn AV, Virmani R. Update on acute coronary syndromes: the pathologists’ view. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:719–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sclarovsky S, Mager A, Kusniec J, et al. Electrocardiographic classification of acute myocardial ischemia. Isr J Med Sci. 1990;26:525–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Birnbaum Y, Nikus K, Kligfield P, et al. The role of the ECG in diagnosis, risk estimation, and catheterization laboratory activation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a consensus document. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2014;19:412–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nikus K, Pahlm O, Wagner G, et al. Electrocardiographic classification of acute coronary syndromes: a review by a committee of the International Society for Holter and Non-invasive Electrocardiology. J Electrocardiol. 2010;43:91–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Whitten M. The relation of the distribution and structure of the coronary arteries to myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 1930;45:383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Myers GB, Klein HA, Hiratzka T. Correlation of electrocardiographic and pathologic findings in large anterolateral infarcts. Am Heart J. 1948;36:838–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Horan LG, Flowers NC, Johnson JC. Significance of the diagnostic Q wave of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1971;43:428–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wasserman AG, Bren GB, Ross AM, Richardson DW, Hutchinson RG, Rios JC. Prognostic implications of diagnostic Q waves after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1982;65:1451–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Phibbs B. “Transmural” versus “subendocardial” myocardial infarction: an electrocardiographic myth. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;1:561–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Raunio H, Rissanen V, Romppanen T, et al. Changes in the QRS complex and ST segment in transmural and subendocardial myocardial infarctions. A clinicopathologic study. Am Heart J. 1979;98:176–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moon JC, De Arenaza DP, Elkington AG, et al. The pathologic basis of Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:554–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maroko PR, Braunwald E. Effects of metabolic and pharmacologic interventions on myocardial infarct size following coronary occlusion. Circulation. 1976;53:I162–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fowler NO. “Preinfarctional” angina. A need for an objective definition and for a controlled clinical trial of its management. Circulation. 1971;44:755–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Braunwald E. Unstable angina. A classification. Circulation. 1989;80:410–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bayes de Luna A, Wagner G, Birnbaum Y, et al. A new terminology for left ventricular walls and location of myocardial infarcts that present Q wave based on the standard of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a statement for healthcare professionals from a committee appointed by the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiography. Circulation. 2006;114:1755–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de Luna Bayés A, Cino JM, Pujadas E, et al. Concordance of electrocardiographic patterns and healed myocardial infarction location detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:443–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Blackburn H, Keys A, Simonson E, Rautaharju P, Punsar S. The electrocardiogram in population studies. A classification system. Circulation. 1960;21:1160–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Selvester RH, Wagner GS, Hindman NB. The Selvester QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. The development and application of the system. Arch Intern Med. 1985;145:1877–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Carlsen EA, Bang LE, Ahtarovski KA, et al. Comparison of Selvester QRS score with magnetic resonance imaging measured infarct size in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2012;45:414–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aldrich HR, Wagner NB, Boswick J, et al. Use of initial ST-segment deviation for prediction of final electrocardiographic size of acute myocardial infarcts. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61:749–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Christian TF, Gibbons RJ, Clements IP, Berger PB, Selvester RH, Wagner GS. Estimates of myocardium at risk and collateral flow in acute myocardial infarction using electrocardiographic indexes with comparison to radionuclide and angiographic measures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:388–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bouwmeester S, van Hellemond IE, Maynard C, et al. The stability of the ST segment estimation of myocardial area at risk between the prehospital and hospital electrocardiograms in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2011;44:363–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Clemmensen P, Grande P, Aldrich HR, Wagner GS. Evaluation of formulas for estimating the final size of acute myocardial infarcts from quantitative ST-segment elevation on the initial standard 12-lead ECG. J Electrocardiol. 1991;24:77–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fakhri Y, Schoos MM, Clemmensen P, Sejersten M. Clinical use of the combined Sclarovsky Birnbaum severity and Anderson Wilkins acuteness scores from the pre-hospital ECG in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2014;47:566–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilkins ML, Pryor AD, Maynard C, et al. An electrocardiographic acuteness score for quantifying the timing of a myocardial infarction to guide decisions regarding reperfusion therapy. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:617–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sejersten M, Ripa RS, Maynard C, et al. Timing of ischemic onset estimated from the electrocardiogram is better than historical timing for predicting outcome after reperfusion therapy for acute anterior myocardial infarction: a DANish trial in acute myocardial infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) substudy. Am Heart J. 2007;154:61.e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sclarovsky S. Electrocardiography of acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd; 1999. p. 1–29. Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Eskola MJ, Holmvang L, Nikus KC, et al. The electrocardiogram window of opportunity to treat vs. the different evolving stages of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: correlation with therapeutic approach, coronary anatomy, and outcome in the DANAMI-2 trial. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2985–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sagie A, Sclarovsky S, Strasberg B, et al. Acute anterior wall myocardial infarction presenting with positive T waves and without ST segment shift. Electrocardiographic features and angiographic correlation. Chest. 1989;95:1211–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Birnbaum GD, Birnbaum I, Birnbaum Y. Twenty years of ECG grading of the severity of ischemia. J Electrocardiol. 2014;47:546–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Expert Committee. Hypertension and coronary heart disease: classification and criteria for epidemiological studies. First report of the expert committee on cardiovascular diseases and hypertension. WHO Tech Rep Ser World Health Organ. 1959;168:1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Task Force. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Report of the Joint International Society and Federation of Cardiology/World Health Organization Task Force on standardization of clinical nomenclature. Circulation. 1979;59:607–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2525–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127:e362–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. de Zwaan C, Bar FW, Wellens HJ. Characteristic electrocardiographic pattern indicating a critical stenosis high in left anterior descending coronary artery in patients admitted because of impending myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1982;103:730–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nikus KC, Sclarovsky S, Huhtala H, Niemela K, Karhunen P, Eskola MJ. Electrocardiographic presentation of global ischemia in acute coronary syndrome predicts poor outcome. Ann Med. 2012;44:494–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Steg PG, James SK, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2569–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sclarovsky S, Rechavia E, Strasberg B, et al. Unstable angina: ST segment depression with positive versus negative T wave deflections–clinical course, ECG evolution, and angiographic correlation. Am Heart J. 1988;116:933–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Verouden NJ, Koch KT, Peters RJ, et al. Persistent precordial “hyperacute” T-waves signify proximal left anterior descending artery occlusion. Heart. 2009;95:1701–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Macfarlane PW, Katibi IA, Hamde ST, et al. Racial differences in the ECG – selected aspects. J Electrocardiol. 2014;47:809–14.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Birnbaum Y, Bayes de Luna A, Fiol M, et al. Common pitfalls in the interpretation of electrocardiograms from patients with acute coronary syndromes with narrow QRS: a consensus report. J Electrocardiol. 2012;45:463–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cerqueira M, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kjell Nikus MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nikus, K., Birnbaum, Y. (2015). Acute Coronary Syndromes: Introduction and Pathophysiologic Classification. In: Jagadeesh, G., Balakumar, P., Maung-U, K. (eds) Pathophysiology and Pharmacotherapy of Cardiovascular Disease. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15961-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15961-4_19

  • Publisher Name: Adis, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15960-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15961-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics