Abstract
Recent advances in the field of quantum cognition (Pothos and Busemeyer 2013; Wang et al. 2013) suggest a puzzling connection between fundamental physics and the mind. Many researchers see quantum ideas and formalisms merely as useful pragmatic tools, and do not look for deeper underlying explanations for why they work. However, others are tempted to seek for an intelligible explanation for why quantum ideas work to model cognition. This paper first draws attention to how the physicist David Bohm already in 1951 suggested that thought and quantum processes are analogous, adding that this could be explained if some neural processes underlying thought involved non-negligible quantum effects. The paper next points out that the idea that there is a connection between fundamental physics and the mind is not unique to quantum theory, but was there already when Newtonian physics was assumed to be fundamental physics, advocated most notably by Kant. Kant emphasized the unique intelligibility of a Newtonian notion of experience, and this historical background prompts us to ask in the final part of the paper whether we can really make sense of any quantum-like experience (whether experience of the empirical phenomena in the “external world” or the “inner world” of psychological phenomena). It is proposed that intelligibility is a relative notion and that, regardless of initial difficulties, quantum approaches to cognition and consciousness are likely to provide valuable new ways of understanding the mind.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literature
Atmanspacher, H.: Quantum approaches to consciousness. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/qt-consciousness/
Atmanspacher, H., Römer, H., Walach, H.: Weak quantum theory: complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Found. Phys. 32, 379–406 (2002)
Atmanspacher, H.: At home in the quantum world. Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 276–277 (2013)
Ball, P.: The dawn of quantum biology. Nature 474, 272–274 (2011)
Bermúdez, J., Cahen, A.: Nonconceptual mental content. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2012). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/content-nonconceptual/
Brook, A.: Kant and the Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)
Bruza, P.D., Kitto, K., Nelson, D., McEvoy, C.: Is there something quantum like in the human mental lexicon? J. Math. Psychol. 53, 362–377 (2009)
Bohm, D.: Quantum Theory. Prentice Hall, New York (1951). Republished by Dover (1989)
Craddock, T.J.A., Friesen, D., Mane, J., Hameroff, S., Tuszynski, J.A.: The feasibility of coherent energy transfer in microtubules. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140677 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0677
Gabora, L., Aerts, D.: Contextualizing concepts using a mathematical generalization of the quantum formalism. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 14, 327–358 (2002)
Jack, A., Roepstorff, A. (eds.): Trusting the Subject?: The Use of Introspective Evidence in Cognitive Science. Imprint Academic, Thorverton (2003)
Kant, I.: Critique of Pure Reason, 2nd edn. J.M. Dent & Sons Ktd, London (1991). Originally published in German in 1787
Ladyman, J., Ross, D.: Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
Pronin, E., Kugler, M.B.: Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: the introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43(4), 565–578 (2007)
Pylkkänen, P.: Can quantum analogies help us to understand the process of thought? Mind Matter 12(1), 61–91 (2014)
Pylkkänen, P.: Weak vs. strong quantum cognition. In: Liljenström, H. (ed.) Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (IV). Springer, Dordrecht (2015)
Pylkkö, P.: The Aconceptual Mind: Heideggerian Themes in Holistic Naturalism. John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia (1998)
Searle, John: Minds, Brains and Programs. Behav. Brain Sci. 3(3), 417–457 (1980)
Smolensky, P.: On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behav. Brain Sci. 11, 1–74 (1988)
Strawson, P.F.: The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Routledge, London (1966)
Toulmin, S.: Philosophy of science. In: Encyclopedia Britannica (2003)
Wang, Z., Busemeyer, J.R., Atmanspacher, H., Pothos, E.M.: The potential of using quantum theory to build models of cognition. Top. Cogn. Sci. 5, 672–688 (2013)
von Wright, G.H.: Vetenskapen och förnuftet. Ett försök till orientering. Söderströms, Helsinki (1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pylkkänen, P. (2015). Fundamental Physics and the Mind – Is There a Connection?. In: Atmanspacher, H., Bergomi, C., Filk, T., Kitto, K. (eds) Quantum Interaction. QI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8951. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15930-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15931-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)