Abstract
Why are Chinese lagging behind in their reported levels of life satisfaction during a period of spectacular economic growth? This paper endeavors to investigate the impacts of government size on Chinese individuals’ reported life satisfaction levels. We apply ordered probit regressions to a unique data set of five rounds of surveys on Chinese individuals between 1998 and 2008, which interviews over 10,000 individuals who are located in 22 provinces.
In general we find strong evidence that government size has a detrimental impact on elders’ life satisfaction, in particular for rich residents and in more developed regions. We also find that GDP brings uneven outcomes to the population, with poor residents and those in rural and less developed regions being adversely affected, whilst rich residents enjoy the fruits of higher GDP per capita.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Other researchers find a “flat line” (for example, Crabtree and Wu (2011)’s Gallup report for 1999–2010).
- 2.
- 3.
http://finance.ce.cn/rolling/201210/23/t20121023_16996977.shtml, accessed on March 23, 2015
- 4.
- 5.
The cognitive status of interviewees is determined using the mini-mental state examination (MMSE; Folstein et al. 1975). The MMSE score ranges from 0 to 30, and people with scores of 18 or more are considered as being cognitively normal and those with scores less than 18 are categorized as cognitively impaired (Zeng et al. 2002). Cognitively impaired elders are dropped because they may not be able to appropriately address their feelings about life satisfaction.
- 6.
The CLHLS started to question about household income and self-rated economic status since 2002. The question reads “What was the income per capita of your household last year?” in 2002 and 2005, then it was rephrased as “What was the total income of your household last year?” in 2008. Therefore we use income quartiles to replace the real household per capita income in the analysis.
- 7.
We thank one of the anonymous referees on his/her insightful review and constructive suggestions.
References
Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.
Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2007). The bigger the better: Evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world. Public Choice, 130, 267–292.
Brockmann, H., Delhey, J., Welzel, C., & Hao Yuan. (2009). The China puzzle: Falling happiness in a rising economy. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 387–405.
Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness and utility: An explanation for the Easterli-Paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 95–144.
Crabtree, S., & Wu, T. (2011). China’s puzzling flat line. Gallup Management Journal. http://gmj.gallup.com/content/148853/china-puzzling-flat-line.aspx#1. Accessed 9 Jan 2013.
Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1 Winter), 25–46.
Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. American Economic Review, 91(1), 335–341.
Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 809–827.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in Honour of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic.
Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, 35–47.
Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.
Easterlin, R. A., Morgan, R., Switek, M., & Fei Wang. (2012). China’s life satisfaction, 1990–2010. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1205672109. Accessed 27 July 2014.
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002, June). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2010, September). Happiness and public choice. Public Choice, 14, S.557–S.573.
Gao, S., Meng, X., & Zhang, L. (2014). Fiscal decentralization and life satisfaction: Evidence from urban China. Social Indicators Research, 119(3), 1177–1194. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0552-z.
Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006, Winter). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.
Knight, J., & Gunatilaka, R. (2011). Does economic growth raise happiness in China. Oxford Development Studies, 39(1), 1–24.
Li, H., & Zhou, L.-A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1743–1762.
Liu, Z., & Shang, Q. (2012). Individual well-being in urban China: The role of income expectations. China Economic Review, 23(4), 833–849.
Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2001). Identifying welfare effects from subjective questions. Economica, 68(271), 335–357.
Yamamura, E. (2011). The influence of government size on economic growth and life satisfaction: A case study from Japan. Japanese Economy, 38(4), 28–64.
Zeng, Y., Vaupel, J. W., Xiao, Z., Zhang, C., & Liu, Y. (2002). Socio-demographic and health profiles of the oldest old in China. Population and Development Review, 28(2), 251–273.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gao, S., Meng, X. (2015). The Impact of Government Size on Chinese Elders’ Life Satisfaction: 1998–2008. In: Maggino, F. (eds) A New Research Agenda for Improvements in Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15904-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15904-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15903-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15904-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)