Abstract
The paper discusses the development of economic techniques for dealing with uncertainties in economic analysis of planting trees to mitigate climatic change. In consideration of uncertainty, time preference and intergenerational equity, the traditional cost-benefit analysis framework is challenged with regard to the discounting/non-discounting of carbon uptake benefits, and because it usually uses a constant and positive discount rate. We investigate the influence of various discounting protocols on the outputs of economic analysis. The idea of using the declining discount rate is also considered. Several numerical examples dealing with the analysis of afforestation for carbon sequestration in Scotland and Ukraine are provided. We show that the choice of discounting protocols have a considerable influence on the results of economic analysis, and therefore, on the decision-making processes related to climate change mitigation strategies. The paper concludes with some innovative insights on accounting for uncertainties and time preference in tackling climate change through forestry, several climate policy implications of dealing with uncertainties, and a brief discussion of what the use of different discounting protocols might imply for decision making.
This article is part of a Special Issue on “Third International Workshop on Uncertainty in Greenhouse Gas Inventories” edited by Jean Ometto and Rostyslav Bun.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bateman IJ, Lovett AA (2000) Estimating and valuing the carbon sequestered in softwood and hardwood trees, timber products and forest soils in Wales. J Environ Manag 60:301–323
Binkley D, Ryan M, Stape J, Barnard H, Fownes J (2002) Age-related decline in forest ecosystem growth: an individual-tree, stand-structure hypothesis. Ecosystem 5:58–67
Bottcher H, Freibauer A, Scholz Y, Gitz V, Ciais P,MundM,Wutzler T, Schulze E-D (2012) Setting priorities for land management to mitigate climate change. Carbon Balance Manag 7(5)
Brainard J, Bateman IJ, Lovett AA (2009) The social value of carbon sequestered in Great Britain’s woodlands. Ecol Econ 68:1257–1267
Chichilnsky G (1997) What is sustainable development? Land Econ 73:467–491
Chomitz KM (2002) Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: how do forestry and energy projects compare? Clim Pol 2(1):35–49
Clark C (1973) The economics of over-exploitation. Science 181:630–634
Cyriacy-Wantrup SV (1942) Private enterprise and conservation. J Farm Econ 24:12–21
DEFRA (2008) Climate change act http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/climatechange/uk/
Dyer G, NijnikM(2013) Implications of carbon forestry programs on local livelihoods and leakage. Ann For Sci. doi:10.1007/s13595-013-0293-9
FC Forestry Commission (2010) Forestry facts and figures. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (2010) http://www.fao.org/forestry
Galbraith D, Smith P, Mortimer N, Stewart R, Hobson M, McPherson G, Matthews R, Mitchell P, Nijnik M, Norris J, Skiba U, Smith J, Towers W (2006) Review of greenhouse gas life cycle emissions, air pollution impacts, economics of biomass production and consumption in Scotland. SEERAD FF/05/08 Project Report
Gensiruk S, Nizhnik M (1995) Geography of forest resources of Ukraine. Svit Publishers, Lviv
Gollier C (2001) The economics of risk and time. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Groom B, Hepburn C, Kondouri P, Pearce D (2005) Discounting the future: the long and short of it. Environ Resour Econ (31)
Hanley N, Spash C (1993) Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, UK
Harrod RF (1948) Towards the dynamic economy. St Martin’s Press, London
Heal (1981) Economics and resources. In: Butlin (ed) Economics of the environmental and natural resource policy. Westview Press, Boulder
Hepburn CJ, Koundouri P (2007) Recent advances in discounting: implications for forest economics. J For Econ 2–3(13):169–189
HM Treasury (2003) The green book: appraisal and evaluation in central government. London
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007 mitigation. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Cambridge University Press
Jessome A (1977) Strength and related properties of woods grown in Canada. Forestry Tech. Rep. 21, Ottawa, Canada
Lakida P, Nilsson S, Shvidenko A (1995) Estimation of forest phytomass for selected countries of the former European USSR. WP-95-79 IIASA, Laxenburg
Lebegue D (2005) Révision du taux d’actualisation des investissements publics. Rapport pour le Commissariat General du Plan
Li C, Lofgren KG (2000) Renewable resources and economic sustainability: a dynamic analysis with heterogeneous time preferences. J Environ Econ Manag 40:236–250
Matthews R, Robertson K (2003) Forest products and bioenergy. In: Karjalainen T, Apps MJ (eds) Carbon sequestration in the global forest sector. IUFRO Task Forces on Environmental Change state of the art report
Moran D, MacLeod M, Wall E, Eory V, Pajot G, Matthews R, McVittie A, Barnes A, Rees B, Moxey A, Williams A, Smith P (2008) UK marginal abatement cost curves for the agriculture and land use, land use change and forestry sectors out to 2022 with qualitative analysis of options to 2050. Report to the Committee on Climate Change, RMP4950
Nabuurs G, Dolman A, Verkaik E et al. (1999) Resolving issues on terrestrial biospheric sinks in the Kyoto Protocol. Dutch National Research Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change. Report 410 200 030, 100
Newell RG, Stavins RN (2000) Climate change and forests sinks: factors affecting the costs of carbon sequestration. J Environ Econ Manag 40(3):211–235
Nijnik M (2004) To an economist’s perception on sustainability in forestry-in-transition. For Policy Econ 6:403–413
NijnikM(2005) Economics of climate change mitigation forest policy scenarios for Ukraine. ClimPol 4:319–336
Nijnik M, Bizikova L (2008) Responding to the Kyoto Protocol through forestry: a comparison of opportunities for several countries in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics 10:257–269
Nijnik M, Miller D (2013) Targeting sustainable provision of forest ecosystem services with special focus on carbon sequestration. In R Matyssek, N Clarke, P Cudlin, T Mikkelsen, J-P Tuovinen, G Wiesser, E Paoletti (eds) Climate change, air pollution and global challenges: understanding and perspectives from forest research. Elsevier, pp 547–565
Nijnik M, Slee B, Pajot G (2011) Opportunities and challenges for terrestrial carbon offsetting and marketing, with some implications for forestry in the UK. South-East Eur For J 1(2):69–79
Nijnik M, Oskam A, Nijnik A (2012) Afforestation for the provision of multiple ecosystem services: a Ukrainian case study. Int J For Res 1–12
Nijnik M, Pajot G, Moffat A, Slee B (2013) An economic analysis of the establishment of forest plantations in the UK to mitigate climate change. Forest Policy and Economics 26:34–42
Nordhaus W (1991) To slow or not to slow: the economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ J 101:920–938
Pearce D, Turner R (1990) Economics of natural resources and the environment. Hertfordshire
Price C (2005) How sustainable is discounting? Economics, sustainability and natural resources. In: Kant, Berry (eds) (1), p 6
Pussinen A, Karjalajnen T, Kellomaki S, Makipaa R (1997) Potential contribution of the forest sector to carbon sequestration in Finland. Biomass Bioenergy 6(13):377–387
Ramsey FP (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Econ J 38:543–559
Read DJ, Freer-Smith PH, Morison JIL, Hanley N, West CC, Snowdon P (2009) Combating climate change—a role for UK forests. An assessment of the potential of UK’s trees and woodlands to mitigate and adapt to climate change. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh
Richards K, Stokes C (2004) A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: a dozen years of research. Clim Chang 63:1–48
Samuelson P (1961) The evaluation of social income: capital formation and wealth. In: Lutz and Hague (eds) The theory of capital. New York, USA
Savills Research (2010) http://www.savills.co.uk/research/
Shvidenko A, Schepaschenko D, McCallum I, Nilsson S (2010) Can the uncertainty of full carbon accounting of forest ecosystems be made acceptable to policy makers? Clim Chang 103:137–157
Slangen L, Van Kooten G, Van Rie PF (1997) Economics of timber plantations on CO2 emissions in the Netherlands. Tijdschr van de Landbouw 4(12):318–333
Stavins RN, Richards K (2005) The costs of US forest-based carbon sequestration. Report for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington VA
van Kooten GC (2004) Climate change economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
van Kooten GC, Bulte E (2000) The economics of nature: managing biological assets. Blackwell Publ, Oxford
van Kooten GC, Sohngen B (2007) Economics of forest carbon sinks: a review. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 1: 237–269
van Kooten GC, Eagle AJ,Manley J, Smolak T (2004) How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks. Environ Sci Policy 7:239–251
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nijnik, M., Pajot, G. (2015). Accounting for uncertainties and time preference in economic analysis of tackling climate change through forestry and selected policy implications for Scotland and Ukraine. In: Ometto, J., Bun, R., Jonas, M., Nahorski, Z. (eds) Uncertainties in Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15901-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15901-0_16
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15900-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15901-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)