Skip to main content

AA1000: An Analysis of Accountability and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Contemporary Context

  • Chapter
Social Audit Regulation

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 1940 Accesses

Abstract

Contemporaneously, companies—especially private—present themselves as institutions with accountability. The private accountability is the issue addressed by companies from adopting a posture of social responsibility. The central idea of this article is to verify the debate about private accountability, taking into account aspects that comprise it, such as the stakeholder theory.

The standard AA 1000 will also be the subject of our reflections, as it aims to disseminate the central position focused on accountability, particularly in the context of private companies. The chapter presents the main aspects that make up the theoretical debate on the subject, while also addressing their criticisms, especially those made to studies that analyze the accountability from the private sphere—that would be counter to the traditional theories on the subject.

This chapter also discusses what we understand as the development of private accountability in the public sphere. This is a complex debate, especially because many scholars understand accountability as a characteristic phenomenon of the public sphere and can’t, therefore, be thinking and applied within the private sphere. However, the paths taken in this study indicate that accountability is, increasingly, an aspect that makes the concerns of private actors, befriending others, such as social responsibility. Understanding how these relationships develop is the purpose of this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is the book organized by the authors in 2003, to be analyzed in this article. At this point we analyze the introduction of such work, exclusive authored by Mainwaring is titled “Democratic Accountability in Latin America”.

  2. 2.

    The study which Mainwaring refers is the work. “Accountabilities: Five Public Services”, by 1987.

  3. 3.

    The study is the work titled “Democracy, Accountability, and Representation”, by 1999.

  4. 4.

    The work which Mainwaring and Welna (2003) refer is the book “Ministers and Parliament: Accountability in Theory and Practice”, by Diana Woodhouse, 1994.

  5. 5.

    The work in which Guillermo O’Donnell presents this definition is the article entitled “delegative Democracy”, published in the Journal of Democracy, in 1994.

  6. 6.

    The work in question is the author’s master thesis, entitled “Supervised Decentralization: Accountability and Evaluation of Non-State Public Services and Guidance Results in Public Administration”, 2010.

  7. 7.

    Op. Cit.

  8. 8.

    The study in question is Power’s book titled “The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification”, 1997.

  9. 9.

    Op. Cit.

  10. 10.

    The Corbari’study is the “Accountability and Social Control: Challenge to the Construction of Citizenship,” 2004.

  11. 11.

    Released in 1999, AA 1000 has been created with the objective of helping companies, shareholders, auditors, consultants and certification bodies; it can be used alone or in conjunction with other standards of accountability, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), norms and standards such as ISO and SA. 8000. To learn more, see http://www.accountability.org/. Date of access: 28/05/2013.

  12. 12.

    The AA1000 standard, as previously said, appeared in 1999, however, after its release, other updated versions of the standard are available-. 2002 and 2003 In general, these reissues, few changes to the core content. Changes take place in increments, in general, with the inclusion of the thematic content of this standard modules.

  13. 13.

    The ISE is intended to reflect the return on a portfolio composed of stocks of companies with a recognized commitment to social responsibility and corporate sustainability, and also to promote good practices in Brazilian companies.

  14. 14.

    BM & FBOVESPA is a Brazilian capital company formed in 2008 from the integration of the São Paulo Stock Exchange and the Commodities & Futures Exchange operations.

  15. 15.

    For more information, see www.light.com.br.

  16. 16.

    The Pact is a United Nations initiative and has the objective encourage the business community to adopt internationally accepted values in the areas of Human Rights, Labour Relations, Environment and Anti-Corruption in their business practices. To see more: http://www.onu.org.br/.

  17. 17.

    To see more, http://www.suzano.com.br.

References

  • Ashley, P. (2001). Ética e Responsabilidade Social nos Negócios. Saraiva: São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, L. (2002). Globalização e Cultura de negócios”. In A. M. Kirschner, E. R. Gomes, & P. Cappellin (Eds.), Empresa, Empresários e Globalização. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará/FAPERJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbari, E. C. (2004). Accountability e controle social: Desafio à construção da cidadania. Cadernos da Escola de Negócio da UniBrasil. Curitiba, jan/jun 2004. pp. 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, A. V. (2010). Descentralização Vigiada: Accountability e avaliação dos serviços públicos não estatais e da orientação por resultados na administração pública. 2010. Dissertação (Mestrado em Políticas Públicas, Estratégias e Desenvolvimento)—Instituto de Economia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A., & Weisband, E. (Eds.). (2007). Global accountabilities: Participation, pluralism, and public ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, S., & Welna, C. (2003). Democratic accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, G. (1994). Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy, 5(1), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Viewed Homepage

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priscila Erminia Riscado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Riscado, P.E. (2015). AA1000: An Analysis of Accountability and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Contemporary Context. In: Rahim, M., Idowu, S. (eds) Social Audit Regulation. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15838-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics