Child Development, Disability and Global Health: Opportunity and Responsibility

  • Robert W. Armstrong


Children who have a disability and are born in a low- or middle-income country are at great risk, not only because of the disability but because they are not commonly given the opportunity to demonstrate their capability. Most of these countries have signed international conventions committing to equal opportunity for persons with disability. Yet the gap between the commitment and the delivery of needed services is enormous in most cases. Better outcomes can be achieved through using the UN Convention to advocate at government and community levels, through working with parents and communities to understand the potential of their children and by providing the evidence-based but community-adapted strategies that are known to have benefit.


Cerebral Palsy Developmental Potential Early Child Development United Nation Convention Child Disability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. World report on disabilities. 2011. Accessed 13 Oct 2014.
  2. 2.
    United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Some facts about persons with disabilities. Accessed 28 Sept 2014.
  3. 3.
    Heymann J, McNeill, K. Changing children’s chances. UCLA World Policy Analysis Centre. 2013. Accessed 13 Oct 2014.
  4. 4.
    UNICEF. The state of the world’s children 2013. Children with disabilities. Accessed 13 Oct 2014.
  5. 5.
    United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1990. Accessed 13 Oct 2014.
  6. 6.
    UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Accessed 28 Sept 2014.
  7. 7.
    United Nations High Level Meeting on Disability & Development. Break barriers – open doors. 2013. Accessed 13 Oct 2014.
  8. 8.
    Hertzman C, Boyce T. How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:329–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Independent Expert Review Group (iERG) Every Woman, Every Child: A Post-2015 Vision. Third report on information and accountability for women’s and children’s health. 2014. Accessed 13 Oct 2014.
  10. 10.
    Shonkoff JP, Richter L, van der Gaag J, Bhutta ZA. An integrated scientific framework for child survival and early childhood development. Pediatrics. 2012;212:1–13.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2001. Accessed 13 Oct 2014.
  12. 12.
    World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: children & youth version. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2007. Accessed 13 Oct 2014.
  13. 13.
    Schiariti V, Selb M, Cieza A, O’Donnell M. International classification of functioning, disability, and health core sets for children and youth with cerebral palsy: a consensus meeting. Child Care Health Dev. 2014. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12551.
  14. 14.
    Schiariti V, Masse LC, Cieza A, Klassen AF, Sauve K, Armstrong R, et al. Towards the development of the International Classification of Functioning core sets for children with cerebral palsy: a global expert survey. J Child Neurol. 2014;29:582–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schiariti V, Klassen AF, Cieza A, Sauve K, O’Donnell M, Armstrong R, et al. Comparing content of outcome measures in cerebral palsy using the international classification of functioning (ICF-CY): a systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014;18:1–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bronfenbrenner U. Discovering what families do. In: Blankenhorn D, Bayme S, Bethke Elshtain J, editors. Rebuilding the nest: a new commitment to the American family. Milwaukee: Family Service America; 1990. p. 27–38.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosenbaum P. Family and quality of life: key elements in intervention in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53 Suppl 4:68–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bamm EL, Rosenbaum P. Family-centered theory: origins, development, barriers, and support to implementation in rehabilitation medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1618–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    King GA, Rosenbaum PL, King SM. Evaluating family-centred service using a measure of parents’ perceptions. Child Care Health Dev. 1997;23:47–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Law M, Teplicky R, King S, King G, Kertoy M, Rosenbaum P, et al. Family-centred service: moving ideas into practice. Child Care Health Dev. 2005;31:633–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maulik PK, Darmstadt GL. Childhood disability in low- and middle-income countries: overview of screening, prevention, services, legislation, and epidemiology. Pediatrics. 2007;120:S1–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Victora CG, Black RE, Boerma JT, Bryce J. Measuring impact in the Millennium Development Goal era and beyond: a new approach to large-scale effectiveness evaluations. Lancet. 2011;377:85–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PediatricsAga Khan UniversityNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations