Skip to main content

Summary

The challenge when assessing the dental pulp status is complicated since no single diagnostic pulp testing technique can reliably diagnose all pulp conditions. An assessment of the patient history with respect to the problem tooth, careful clinical examination including diagnostic tests and appropriate radiographs will enable the clinician to arrive at the best probable diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chambers IG. The role and methods of pulp testing in oral diagnosis: a review. Int Endod J. 1982;15:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rowe AHR, Pitt-Ford TR. The assessment of pulpal vitality. Int Endod J. 1990;23(2):77–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen S. Diagnostic procedures in pathways of the pulp. Mosby-Year Book, 6th ed. 1994; Chapter 1. pp. 2–21. ISBN: 0801679796.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pitt-Ford TR, Patel S. Technical equipment for the assessment of dental pulp status. Endod Top. 2004;7:2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pretty IA, Maupome G. A closer look at diagnosis in the clinical dental practice: part I reliability, validity, specificity and sensitivity of diagnostic procedures. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004;70(4):251–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pretty IA, Maupome G. A closer look at diagnosis in the clinical dental practice: part 2 using predictive values and receiver operating characteristics in assessing diagnostic accuracy. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004;70(5):313–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pretty IA, Maupome G. A closer look at diagnosis in the clinical dental practice: part 3 effectiveness of radiographic diagnostic procedures. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004;70(6):388–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maupome G, Pretty IA. A closer look at diagnosis in the clinical dental practice: part 4 effectiveness of non-radiographic diagnostic procedures and devices used in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004;70(7):470–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pretty IA, Maupome G. A closer look at diagnosis in the clinical dental practice: part 5 emerging technologies for caries detection and diagnosis. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004;70(8):540(a–i).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pretty IA, Addy L, Maupome G. A closer look at diagnosis in the clinical dental practice: part 6 emerging technologies for caries detection and diagnosis of non non-caries dental problems. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004;70(9):621–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seltzer S, Bender I, Zionitz M. The dynamics of pulp inflammation, correlations between diagnostic data and actual histological findings in the pulp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1963;16:846–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dummer PMH, Hicks R, Huws D. Clinical signs and symptoms in pulp disease. Int Endod J. 1980;13:27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Petersson K, Soderstrom C, Kiani-Anaraki M, Levy G. Evaluation of the ability of thermal and electrical tests to register pulp vitality. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1999;15(3):127–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fulling HJ, Andreasen JO. Influence of the maturation status and tooth type upon electrometric and thermal pulp testing. Scand J Dent Res. 1976;84:291–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith JW. Calcific metamorphosis. A treatment dilemma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;54(4):441–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobsen I, Kerekes K. Long term prognosis of traumatized permanent anterior teeth showing calcifying processes in the pulp cavity. Scand J Dent Res. 1977;85:588–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nitzan DW, Mitchell V, Weinrab M, Azaz B. The effect of aging on tooth morphology. A study of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;61:54–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Michaelson PL, Holland GR. Is pulpitis painful? Int Endod J. 2002;35:829–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peters DD, Baumgartner JC, Adult LL, Diagnosis P. 1. Evaluation of the positive and negative responses to cold and electric pulp tests. J Endod. 1994;20(10):506–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ingram TA, Peters DD. Evaluation of the effects of carbon dioxide used as a pulpal test. Part 2. In vivo effect on canine enamel and pulpal tissues. J Endod. 1983;9:296–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fuss Z, Trowbridge H, Bender IB, Rickoff B, Sorin S. Assessment of reliability of electrical and thermal pulp testing agents. J Endod. 1986;12(7):301–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Augsburger RA, Peters DD. In vitro effects of ice, skin refrigerant, and CO2 snow on intrapulpal temperature. J Endod. 1981;7:110–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ehrmann EH. Pulp testers and pulp testing with particular reference to the use of dry ice. Aust Dent J. 1979;22:272–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pantera EA, Anderson RW, Pantera CT. Reliability of electric pulp testing after pulp testing with dichlorofluoromethane. J Endod. 1993;19(6):312–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller SO, Johnson JD, Alleman JD, Strother JM. Cold testing through full coverage restorations. J Endod. 2004;30:695–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mumford JM. Evaluation of gutta-percha and ethyl chloride in pulp testing. Br Dent J. 1964;116:338–43.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bender IB, Landau MA, Fonsecca S, Trowbridge HO. The optimum placement site of the electrode in electric pulp testing of 12 anterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989;118:305–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dalsanto FB, Throckmorton GS, Ellis E. Reproducibility of data from a hand held digital pulp tester used on teeth and oral soft tissue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992;72:103–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fulling HJ, Andreasen JO. Influence of splints and temporary crowns upon electric and thermal pulp testing procedures. Scand J Dent Res. 1976;84:291–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cooley RL, Robison SF. Variables associated with electric pulp testing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980;50:66–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin J, Chandler NP, Purton D, Monteith B. Appropriate electrode placement site for electric pulp testing first molar teeth. J Endod. 2007;33:1296–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson BL, Broberg C, Baumgartner JC, Harris C, Kron J. Safety of electronic apex locators and pulp testers in patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers or cardioverter/ defibrillators. J Endod. 2006;32:847–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hyman JJ, Cohen ME. Predictive value of endodontic diagnostic tests. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58:343–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lin J, Chandler NP. Electric pulp testing: a review. Int Endod J. 2008;41(5):365–74.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schnettler JM, Wallace JA. Pulse oximetry as a diagnostic tool of pulpal vitality. J Endod. 1991;17:488–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ingolfsson AER, Tronstad L, Hersh EV, Riva CE. Efficacy of laser Doppler flowmetry in determining pulp vitality of human teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994;10(2):83–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Polat S, Er KA, Akpinar KE, Polat NT. The sources of laser Doppler blood-flow signals recorded from vital and root canal treated teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 2004;49:53–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gazelius B, Olgart L, Edwall B, Edwall L. Non-invasive recording of blood flow in human dental pulp. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1986;2:219–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Odor TM, Pitt Ford TR, McDonald F. Effect of wavelength and bandwidth on the clinical reliability of laser Doppler recordings. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996;12:9–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Soo-ampon S, Vongsavan N, Soo-ampon M, Chuckpaiwong S, Matthews B. The sources of laser Doppler blood-flow signals recorded from human teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 2003;48:353–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Patel, B. (2015). Examination and Diagnosis. In: Endodontic Diagnosis, Pathology, and Treatment Planning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15591-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15591-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15590-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15591-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics