Skip to main content

Institutional Change in Spain from Francoism to Democracy: The Effects of the Great Recession

  • Chapter
  • 958 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Political Economy ((POEC))

Abstract

Institutional Change in Spain in the second half of the twentieth century has been a story of success. After the Spanish Civil War, a dictatorship was established in the country in 1939 and the political regime implied an institutional design that evolved over time. In 1959 there was an important reform that propelled economic markets and development, and the death of General Franco in 1975 opened up a period of institutional change that conduced to democracy. The new self-enforcing institutional framework that emerged in the political reform of democratization has implied a modern democratic system, the adhesion to the EU and an Europeanization of civil society, a decentralization political process, social and cultural modernization, the making of a Welfare State, and the expansion of the economy. These institutional foundations adequately worked until the Great Recession that has intensely affected the Spanish economy since 2008. The huge economic crisis has implied electoral changes, new social movements, and distrust on political institutions, and understanding these trends is relevant to study how the economic crisis can influence the process of institutional change in Spain. Therefore, this study attempts to provide new and original empirical evidence on the existence of a long-run relationship between economic crisis and political trust in Spain using monthly data. Specifically, the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach to cointegration is employed to discover such relationship and to quantify the impact of the economic crisis on the Spanish political trust. The empirical findings indicate that the economic crisis has a negative impact on political trust and provide an estimation of this effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In addition, the agreements with the USA allowed the entry of currency that was fundamental to importing the goods of equipment essential to increasing production. In this way, private investment and growth recovered. In these years, Spain experienced an industrial revolution that in 1958 allowed industrial production practically to double that of 1950 (González 1989).

  2. 2.

    The reserves of the Spanish economy were becoming exhausted. In parallel, toward 1958, two phenomena of doubtless relevance to the external position of the Spanish economy took place: (a) on the one hand, Spain entered international economic organizations (the IMF, OEEC, World Bank); (b) on the other hand, in December of 1958, the main European currencies adopted external convertibility.

  3. 3.

    The principles of the Plan have impregnated the processing of Spanish economic policy since 1959, but with different degrees of intensity depending on the moment. For example, the pressures of those in favor of the old autarkic policy provoked the establishment of the 1960 tariff (that maintained discriminated areas of protection) and the application of the Development Plans in the 1960s and early 1970s. Many economists continued to insist on the necessity of continuing the process of reform in the direction of the Plan (Requeijo 1989).

  4. 4.

    According to Caballero (2008), we can point out four causes that motivated the transition from the predatory state of Franco’s dictatorship to the contractual state model of the Constitution of 1978: (a) the economic development of the 1960s and early 1970s would become a cause of democracy. The argument goes that with the modernization of the 1960s, the Spanish economy entered into a “transition zone” (Huntington 1991), in which the possibilities for democratization were multiplied. An increasingly complex market economy calls for a democratic political regime, in such a way that market reform preceded political change. (b) When Franco died, the Spanish economy was affected by problems derived from the international economic crisis, and the crisis damaged the legitimacy of the Franco regime. (c) The Spanish citizens assumed the convenience of the political and economic model of European societies where the welfare level was higher. (d)~The democratic European environment demanded of Spain that she assume a democratic regime.

  5. 5.

    The creation of markets that were free from discretionary public interference was not credible under the Franco regime, as nothing stopped the regime from reneging on previous commitments and not fulfilling them. Thus, the Development Plans could be analyzed as a holdup phenomenon, which meant a step backward by not fulfilling ex post the political contract of the 1959 Plan.

  6. 6.

    There were only two reforms of two articles of the Spanish Constitution since 1978, and they did not imply a change in the institutional equilibrium of the country. The change of article 135 of the Spanish Constitution in 2011, regarding budgetary stability and the payment of the public debt, was the only relevant change, but it did not affect the self-enforcing political institutions.

  7. 7.

    These data can be downloaded from www.cis.es/cis/opencms/ES/11_barometros/Indicadores_PI/gobierno.html.

References

  • Alston, L. J., Eggertsson, T., & North, D. C. (Eds.). (1996). Empirical studies in institutional change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez-Díaz, M., Caballero, G., Manzano, B., & Martin-Moreno, J. M. (2015). Assessment of Political Situation over the business cycle in Spain: A time series analysis. Hacienda Pública Española/Review of Public Economics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardsen, G. (1989). Estimation of long run coefficients in error correction models. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 51(3), 345–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. (1997). Parliament as a wealth maximizing institution: The right to the residual and the right to vote. International Review of Law and Economics, 17, 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, G. (2005). Instituciones, federalismo defensor de mercados y Estado de las Autonomías. Un análisis de segunda generación. El Trimestre Económico, 286, 283–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, G. (2008). El cambio institucional de la economía española del franquismo a la democracia: un análisis histórico institucional. Política y Gobierno, V. XV(2), 353–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, G. (2010). La crisis económica internacional y la política económica de la gobernanza global. In G. Caballero & M. D. Garza (Eds.), La Gran Recesión. Perspectivas globales y regionales. A Coruña: Editorial Netbiblo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, G., & Arias, X. C. (2010). The institutional foundations of the modernisation of economic policy: The case of Spain, 1975–1991. The IUP Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 5(1–2), 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, G., & Arias, X. C. (2013). Transaction cost politics in the map of the new institutionalism. In N. Schofield, G. Caballero, & D. Kselman (Eds.), Advances in political economy: Institutions, modeling and empirical analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, G., Garza, M. D., & Varela, M. M. (2010). Effects of the great recession on the Spanish economy. Current Politics and Economics of Europe, 21(4), 461–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, K., Gómez-Pastruana, T., & Mena, L. (2012). Especial 15-M. Zoom Político, 4, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colomer, J. M. (1998). La transición a la democracia: el modelo español. Barcelona: Anagrama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G., & McCubbins, M. (2001). The institutional determinants of policy outcomes. In S. Haggard & M. D. McCubbins (Eds.), Presidents, parliaments and policy (pp. 21–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felgueroso, F., & Jiménez-Martin, S. (2009). The new growth model. How and with whom? FEDEA Annual Conference Policy: The Crisis of the Spanish Economy, FEDEA, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Villaverde, J., Garicano, L., & Santos, T. (2013). Political credit cycles: The case of the Eurozone. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Villaverde, J., & Ohanian, L. (2009). The Spanish crisis from a global perspective. FEDEA Annual Conference Policy: The Crisis of the Spanish Economy, FEDEA, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. P. (1978). Economic retrospective voting in American national elections: A micro-analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 426–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García Delgado, J. L., & Jiménez, J. C. (1999). Un siglo de España. La economía. Madrid: Marcial Pons.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, M. J. (1989). La autarquía económica bajo el régimen del general Franco: una visión desde la teoría de los derechos de propiedad. Información Comercial Española, 676–677, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A., & Laitin, D. D. (2004). A theory of endogenous institutional change. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 633–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. J. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth-century. Norman and London: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, C., & Caballero, G. (2009). Comparing theories of institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(2), 151–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurenceson, J., & Chai, J. C. H. (2003). Financial reform and economic development in China. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Likki, T. (2012). 15M revisited: A diverse movement united for change. Zoom Político, 11, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S., & Stimson, J. A. (1992). Peasants and bankers? The American electorate and the US economy. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 597–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myro, R. (2010). Crisis económica y crisis industrial. In G. Caballero & M. D. Garza (Eds.), La Gran Recesión. Perspectivas globales y regionales (pp. 83–100). A Coruña: Editorial Netbiblo.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. Nueva York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (2000). La evolución histórica de las formas de gobierno. Revista de Economía Institucional, 2, 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OEP. (2005). Convergence and employment. The Spanish National Reform Program. Spanish Prime Minister’s Economic Office, Ministerio de Presidencia, Gobierno de España, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (2000). Power and prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In S. Strom & P. Diamond (Eds.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: The Ragnar Frisch centennial symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prados, L., & Sanz, J. C. (1996). Growth and macroeconomic performance in Spain, 1939–1993. In N. Crafts & G. Toniolo (Eds.), Economic growth in Europe since 1945 (pp. 355–387). Cambridge: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1993). Political regimes and economic growth. Journal of Economics Perspectives, 7(3), 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Requeijo, J. (1989). Lo que fuimos y lo que somos. Información Comercial Española, 676, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, F., Nowak-Lehmann, F. D., & Otter, T. (2011). Has the financial crisis shattered citizens’ trust in national and European governmental institutions? Evidence from the EU member states, 1999–2010. CEPS Working Documents. N° 343. Centre for European Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royo, S. (2009). After the Fiesta: The Spanish economy meets the global financial crisis. South European Society & Politics, 14(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N., & Caballero, G. (Eds.). (2011). The political economy of institutions, democracy and voting. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N., Caballero, G., & Kselman, D. (Eds.). (2013). Advances in political economy: Institutions, modeling and empirical analysis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, J. M. & Costas, A. (1990). La reforma del marco institucional. In García Delgado, J. L. (dir), Economía de la Transición y de la Democracia. Madrid: CIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2011). Trust in public institutions over the business cycle. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 101(3), 281–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision making in political system: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartism. British Journal of Political Science, 25, 289–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. (2004). Constructing self-enforcing democracy in Spain. In J. Oppenheimer & I. Morris (Eds.), Politics from anarchy to democracy: Rational choice in political science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. R. (1995). The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 11(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gonzalo Caballero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caballero, G., Álvarez-Díaz, M. (2015). Institutional Change in Spain from Francoism to Democracy: The Effects of the Great Recession. In: Schofield, N., Caballero, G. (eds) The Political Economy of Governance. Studies in Political Economy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15551-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics