Skip to main content

Under Valorized Areas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 698 Accesses

Abstract

A region or a city, with local specific resources that are untapped or badly employed, would have potential for development if interaction between agents and institutions were able to bring about appropriate intentional actions. This condition is very hard to fulfill. Even if some actors are oriented towards change, they must exit the circular causation mechanism, where everybody waits for someone else to make the first move. In this chapter we will see a simple representation of the trap. The experience of change can be considered as a condition for changing routines at the level of individual private actors and changing narratives at the level of interaction between actors and institutions. We can therefore simplify by describing persistence and change in the allocation of resources as dependent on decisions of firms that are affected by the experience of other firms. We will also discuss two obvious but ineffective ways of getting out of it: the “big push” and the drop of wages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a general overviews, see Zuo et al. (2013) and Contandriopoulos et al. (2010).

  2. 2.

    Reviews are provided by Rauch et al. (2009) and Dimov (2011).

  3. 3.

    United States, Japan, Australia, Ireland, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Iceland, New Zealand, Spain, Portugal, Luxembourg, Canada, Greece, Germany, Norway, Netherlands, Italy, Belgium, France, Austria, Finland, Denmark, Sweden.

  4. 4.

    A preference for psychological (moral) reasons emerges from direct surveys (Agell and Lundborg 2003; Bewley 1999; Howitt 2002).

  5. 5.

    Including raw material costs, labor costs, depreciation, and a normal remuneration of capital.

  6. 6.

    Reuters in Rome; theguardian.com, Monday 2 December 2013. «While textile was losing weight, clothing made by the Chinese exploded to the point that in a few years in Prato was born a true ethnic industrial district for clothes low cost, unique in Europe, consisting of 4 thousand Chinese companies employing at least 30 thousand compatriots (including illegal), capable of sewing nearly one million item per day. The system covers all phases except the production of the fabric, bought in China at low prices». Silvia Pieraccini—Il Sole 24 Ore—10 August 2012.

  7. 7.

    Sonia Montrella, “Agichina 24”, 14 December 2013.

  8. 8.

    Silvia Pieraccini, cit.

  9. 9.

    «A revival of development would require profound changes which can no longer exclusively and primarily rely on familiar experience, behavioral models, the division of labor, and the integration and innovation that were typical of the former equilibrium. Instead, it requires the conscious construction of a new equilibrium through a deliberate individual and collective action capable of introducing into the economy and into the society substantial innovations consonant with both the local resources which can be activated and with new opportunities of the changed global and local context» (Dei Ottati 2009, 29).

  10. 10.

    «Shirts 3 €, jeans 7.50 (but negotiable), leggings 2.5, dresses long and light between 6 and 7» (Laura Montanari, La Repubblica Firenze.it, 15/12/2013).

  11. 11.

    Two billion euro divided by 40,000 workers divided by 350 days per year, gives 214 €. One million items multiplied by 8 € divided by 40,000 gives 200 €.

References

  • Acemoglu D (2005) Politics and economics in weak and strong states. J Monetary Econ 52:1199–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afonso A, Schuknecht L, Tanzi V (2005) Public sector efficiency: an international comparison. Public Choice 123(3–4):321–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agell J, Lundborg P (2003) Survey evidence on wage rigidity and unemployment: Sweden in the 1990s. Scand J Econ 105(1):15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babecký J, Du Caju P, Kosma T, Lawless M, Messina J, Rõõm T (2009) Downward nominal and real wage rigidity—survey evidence from European firms. Working paper series 1105/Nov, European Central Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers R, Bodas Freitas IM (2008) Analyzing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter? Res Policy 37:1837–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewley FT (1999) Why wages don’t fall during a recession. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco S, Paba S (1997) Per una storia dei distretti industriali italiani dal secondo dopoguerra agli anni novanta. In: Fabrizio Barca (a cura) Storia del capitalismo italiano dal dopoguerra a oggi. Donzelli, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Contandriopoulos D, Lemire M, Denis J-L, Tremblay É (2010) Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q 88(4):444–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damiani M, Pompei F, Ricci A (2011) Temporary job protection and productivity growth in EU economies. MPRA paper 29698

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei Ottati G (2009) Industrial districts’ competitive advantage and external global pressure. In: Johanson G, Smith R, French R (eds) Living outside the walls—the Chinese in Prato. Cambridge Scholar Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimov D (2011) Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 35(1):57–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze J (1999) On the macroeconomics of uncertainty and incomplete markets. Presidential Address for the twelfth world congress of the International Economic Association, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W (2006) Reliving the ‘50s: the big push, poverty traps, and takeoffs in economic development. J Econ Growth 11(4):289–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff K, Stiglitz JE (2001) Modern economic theory and development. In: Meier G, Stiglitz JE (eds) Frontiers of development economics: the future in perspective. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 389–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Howitt P (2002) Looking inside the labor market: a review article. J Econ Lit 40(1):125–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner IM (2000) The driving force of the market: essays in Austrian economics. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koszerek D, Havik K, Mc Morrow K, Röger W, Schönborn F (2007) An overview of the EU KLEMS Growth and productivity accounts. European Commission Economic papers 290

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1993) Toward a counter-counterrevolution in development theory. In: Proceedings of the World Bank annual conference on development economics, pp 15–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein H (1957) Economic backwardness and economic growth. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1989) Industrialization and the big-push. J Polit Econ 97(5):1003–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurkse R (1953) Problems of capital formation in underdeveloped countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Peneder M (2003) Intangible investment and human resources. In: Metcalf JS, Cantner U (eds) Change, transformation, and development. Fisica Verlag, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittaway L (2005) Philosophies in entrepreneurship: a focus on economic theories. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res 11(3):201–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch A, Wiklund J, Lumpkin GT, Frese M (2009) Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 33(3):761–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D (1993) Do low-income countries have a high-wage option? Working paper series National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. 4451

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein-Rodan PN (1943) Problems of industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Econ J 52(210):202–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter WEG (1960) Productivity and technical change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter AJ (1939) Business cycles—a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process, vol II. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod J (2002) Trust in public finance. NBER working paper series, Working paper 9187

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ark B, Chen V, Colijn B, Jaeger K, Overmeer W, Timmer M (2013) Recent changes in Europe’s competitive landscape and medium-term perspectives: how the sources of demand and supply are shaping up. European Commission economic papers 485

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuo M, Zhao D, Gao P (2013) Models for describing knowledge transfer mechanisms. Sci J Manage Sci Eng 3(3):63–72

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilberto Seravalli .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seravalli, G. (2015). Under Valorized Areas. In: An Introduction to Place-Based Development Economics and Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15377-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics