Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Purpose of the Book and Editorial Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Engineering Education in the Middle East and North Africa

  • 657 Accesses

Abstract

Engineering and engineering education play an essential role in the Middle East. Global debates regarding roles of engineering and required transformations in engineering education have been extensive during the past few years. The past decade has witnessed the emergence of engineering education research as an independent field, led by tremendous investment in the USA. Some institutions have started embracing radical and transformative approaches to engineering education and curriculum design driven by recent research findings and pressing national needs, for example, Georgia Tech., Olin College, and Singapore University of Technology and Design. Parallel to this, engineering education in the Middle East has witnessed significant shifts, both quantitatively and qualitatively. For instance, many national institutions have standardized their curricula through Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) accreditation, many international universities have opened branch campuses in various Middle Eastern countries, and the number of new universities is rapidly increasing in many countries (e.g., Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and United Arab Emirates). Furthermore, engineering continues to be a preferred higher education choice for a significant portion of Middle Eastern students compared to the trends currently witnessed in the West. Nevertheless, apart from seeking ABET accreditation, efforts to innovate in engineering curricula and/or adopt/adapt novel approaches in the Middle East seem to be isolated, and depend, to a large extent, on instructors’ choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdulwahed, M., Pokharel, S., Balid, W., & Hasna, M. O. (2013). Systemic framework of competencies of 21st century technical and engineering human resource: A development case for a knowledge based economy in Qatar. In GCC Conference and Exhibition (GCC), November 7th IEEE (pp. 413–418). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hassani, S. T. S. (Ed.). (2012). 1001 inventions: The enduring legacy of Muslim civilization. Washington, DC: National Geographic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: George Washington University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185–207. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01056.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannan, K. P., & Wankat, P. C. (2005). Survey of first-year programs. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, USA. http://search.asee.org/search/fetch?url=file%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%2FE%3A%2Fsearch%2Fconference%2F29%2FAC%25202005Paper855.pdf&index=conference_papers&space=129746797203605791716676178&type=application%2Fpdf&charset=.

  • Civitas Learning. (2013). Civitas Learning. http://www.civitaslearning.com/. Accessed 15 Oct 2014.

  • Davis, D. C., Gentili, K. L., Trevisan, M. S., & Calkins, D. E. (2002). Engineering design assessment processes and scoring scales for program improvement and accountability. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(2), 211–221. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00694.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derntl, M., & Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2005). The role of structure, patterns, and people in blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(2), 111–130. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., & Sorensen, C. D. (1997). Engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dym, C. M., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froyd, J. E., & Lohmann, J. R. (2014). Chronological and ontological development of engineering education as a field of scientific inquiry. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froyd, J. E., Beach, A., Henderson, C., & Finkelstein, N. (2008). Improving educational change agents’ efficacy in science, engineering, and mathematics education. In H. Hartman (Ed.), Integrating the sciences and society: Challenges, practices, and potentials (Vol. 16, pp. 227–255). London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(13), 1344–1360. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2012.2190167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froyd, J. E., Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Henderson, C., & Prince, M. J. (2013). Estimates of use of research-based instructional strategies in core electrical or computer engineering courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 393–399. doi:10.1109/TE.2013.2244602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinter, L. E. (1955). Report on evaluation of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 25–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. doi:10.1119/1.18809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C., Dancy, M. H., & Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2012). Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process? Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020104–020115. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, K., Hosokawa, M., Blake, R., Headrick, L., & Johnson, G. (2006). Problem-based learning outcomes: Ten years of experience at the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine. Academic Medicine, 81(7), 617–625. doi:10.1097/01.ACM.0000232411.97399.c6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, S. (2010). Where are we now? Statistics on capstone courses nationwide. Advances in Engineering Education, 2(1), 1–27. http://advances.asee.org/vol02/issue01/03.cfm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2006). Cooperation in the college classroom (3rd ed.). Edina: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819–827. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litzinger, T. A., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R. G., & Newstetter, W. C. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2011). Team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128, 41–51. doi:10.1002/tl.467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, G. M., & Patterson, E. T. (1998). Just-in-time teaching: Active learning pedagogy with WWW. Paper presented at the IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, Cancun, Mexico. http://webphysics.iupui.edu/JITT/ccjitt.html.

  • Olson, S., & Riordan, D. G. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Report to the President. Washington, DC, USA: Executive Office of the President, President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prados, J. W., Peterson, G. D., & Lattuca, L. R. (2005). Quality assurance of engineering education through accreditation: The impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and its global influence. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 165–184. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00836.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. J. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–128. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. J., Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Henderson, C., & Froyd, J. E. (2013). Use of research-based instructional strategies in core chemical engineering courses. Chemical Engineering Education, 47(1), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seely, B. E. (1999). The other re-engineering of engineering education, 1900–1965. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(3), 285–294. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00449.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S., & Jennison, R. (1997). Freshman engineering design experiences and organizational framework. International Journal of Engineering Education, 13(3), 190–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., & Colby, A. (2008). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, S. R., Nielsen, N. R., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Eds.). (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51. doi:10.3102/00346543069001021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien, L. T., Roth, V., & Kampmeier, J. A. (2002). Implementation of a peer-led team learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 606–632. doi:10.1002/tea.10038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., Sorensen, C. D., Swan, B. R., & Anthony, D. K. (1995). A survey of capstone engineering courses in North America. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. R., Hrymak, A. N., Marshall, R. R., Wood, P. E., Crowe, C. M., Hoffman, T. W., Wright, J. D., Taylor, P. A., Woodhouse K. A., & Bouchard, C. G. K. (1997). Developing problem solving skills: The McMaster problem solving program. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

    Mahmoud Abdulwahed & Mazen O. Hasna

  2. Engineering Academic and Student Affairs, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Jeffrey E. Froyd

Authors
  1. Mahmoud Abdulwahed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mazen O. Hasna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeffrey E. Froyd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud Abdulwahed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

    Mahmoud Abdulwahed

  2. Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

    Mazen O. Hasna

  3. Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA

    Jeffrey E. Froyd

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abdulwahed, M., Hasna, M., Froyd, J. (2016). Purpose of the Book and Editorial Perspectives. In: Abdulwahed, M., Hasna, M., Froyd, J. (eds) Advances in Engineering Education in the Middle East and North Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15323-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15323-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15322-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15323-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation