Abstract
In spectrum overlay approach, SUs coexists with PUs and share their spectrum. However, each SU has imposed transmit power constraint so as not to create any harmful interference to active PUs. The main goal of each SU is to maintain lower interference level than the specified tolerable level at PUs while sharing PUs’ licensed bands dynamically. To maintain low interference level, SUs must transmit with lower transmit power. Thus power control is essential for each SUs. In wireless communications, power control is performed to satisfy the specified minimum signal-to-interference-plus-noise (SINR) to get desired data rate [2, 7]. For voice communications, once target SINR level is met, there will be no improvement in voice quality by increasing power or SINR. However, for data communications, increase in SINR results in increase in data rate. Thus, SUs try to increases their SINR values by increasing their transmission powers while satisfying their imposed power constraints in data communications.
Keywords
- Cognitive Radio
- Admission Control
- Code Division Multiple Access
- Time Division Multiple Access
- Interference Constraint
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
M. Andersin, Z. Rosberg, and J. Zander. Gradual Removals in Cellular PCS with Constrained Power Control and Noise. Wireless Networks, 2(1):27–43, 1996.
M. Chiang, P. Hande, T. Lan, and C. W. Tee. Power Control Wireless Cellular Networks. Foundations Trends Networking, 2008.
Hongyu Gu and Chenyang Yang. Power and Admission Control for UWB Cognitive Radio Networks. In IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2008), pages 4933–4937, Beijing, China, 2008.
J. Huang, R. Berry, and M. L. Honig. Distributed Interference Compensation for Wireless Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(5):1074–1084, May 2006.
Long Bao Le and E. Hossain. Resource allocation for Spectrum Underlay in Cognitive Radio Networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communicationsg, 7(12):5306–5315, Dec. 2008.
A. Papoulis and S.U. Pillai. Probability, random variables and stochastic processes with errata sheet. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math, 2001.
D. C. Popescu, O. Popescu, and D. B. Rawat. Gradient Descent Interference Avoidance with Target SIR Matching. In Proceedings \(5^{\mbox{ th}}\) Annual IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, CCNC’08, Las Vegas, NV, Jan. 2008.
Danda B Rawat, Bhed B Bista, Gongjun Yan, and Sachin Shetty. Waiting probability analysis for opportunistic spectrum access. International Journal of Adaptive and Innovative Systems, 2(1):15–28, 2014.
Danda B Rawat, Bhed Bahadur Bista, and Gongjun Yan. Combined admission, power and rate control for cognitive radios in dynamic spectrum access ad-hoc networks. In Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS), 2010 13th International Conference on, pages 240–245, 2010.
D. M. Topkis. Supermodularity and Complementarity. Princeton University Press, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rawat, D.B., Song, M., Shetty, S. (2015). Resource Allocation in Spectrum Underlay Cognitive Radio Networks. In: Dynamic Spectrum Access for Wireless Networks. SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15299-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15299-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15298-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15299-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)