Skip to main content

Failed Encounters or the Challenges of Rendering Gender a Matter of Concern

  • Chapter
Illdisciplined Gender

Part of the book series: Crossroads of Knowledge ((CROKNOW))

  • 455 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter argues that gender both as embodied performance and as a subject matter participates in (dis)enabling much needed contact zones between the physical sciences, science studies and gender studies, albeit in ways that often go unnoticed. Here I take scientists’ propensity to object to, or cast as irrelevant, particular gender performances as a resource to rethink how we might present asymmetrical gender relations in science in ways that incite concern and responsibility. Taking the example of a research presentation, I re-examine how my embodied collaboration with graphs, voices and theory geared to render gender a tangible matter of fact was in part achieved by bracketing the practices and technologies of particular research strategies, casting gender as a social construct rather than a socio-natural hybrid and enacting a mode of critique rather than foregrounding multiple ontologies. I argue that a lack of concern and responsibility is better engaged by making the entanglements, practicalities and tensions of gender and accountability explicit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Teaching encounters at departments of physics included the course Physics and Gender (http://www.fysik.su.se/~sararyd/fog/Kursinformation-Fysik-och-genus.pdf) and the International Summer School: Diversity in the Cultures of Physics (http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/einrichtungen/ag/ag-scheich/projekte/archiv_summer_school/index.html). Research encounters included the two international symposia: Interferometric Investigations of Physical Knowledges and Gender in the Making (2011) and Materialities and (Dis)embodiments of Naturecultures (2012) that we co-organised at the Centre for Gender Research as well as individual research projects by the group members. On this basis an interdisciplinary reader develops the notion of interference to bring into conversation heretofore dispersed texts that explore the situated interactions of gender and physics in the making. Here the physical phenomena of propagation, diffraction, resonance and refraction are used to conceptualise the histories, epistemologies, cultures and knowledge transfers of physics and gender.

  2. 2.

    The research that we reported on had been conducted as part of the project ‘Knowledge, Institutions and Gender: An East-West Comparative Study’ (KNOWING) that explored epistemic contexts and cultures in the natural and social sciences in five European countries. For more information, see www.knowing.soc.cas.cz.

  3. 3.

    As Law has argued referring to Haraway’s notion of interference, ‘some things are endlessly produced and are very real. Others are not. Interference takes the form of enacting realities, tropes in speech and action, that will make a difference in the configurations of the real’ (Law 2004a: 4).

  4. 4.

    A disaggregation of Eurostat data by countries shows that the percentage of women in grade A positions continues to be highest in countries and sectors where wages, resources and prestige are lowest. In 2010 these were the higher education sectors in Romania, Latvia and Croatia.

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2002). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2004). The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body & Society, 10, 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2009). She figures 2009: Statistics and indicators on gender equality in science. Brussels: Directorate General for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). She figures 2012: Gender in research and innovation. Statistics and indicators. Brussels: Directorate General for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunaratnam, Y. (2007). Where is the love? Art, aesthetics and research. Journal of Social Work Practice, 21, 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness @Second_Millenium. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hird, M. (2009). The origins of sociable life: Evolution after science studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschauer, S., & Mol, A. (1995). Shifting sexes, moving stories: Feminist/constructivist dialogues. Science, Technology and Human Values, 20, 368–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1987). On the need to count past two in our thinking about gender and science. New Ideas of Psychology, 3, 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of “science studies” to the social sciences. The British Journal of Sociology, 51, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matter of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004a). Enacting naturecultures: A note from STS. Published by the Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University at http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/sociology/research/publications/papers/law-enacting-naturecultures.pdf. Last accessed 4 Mar 2014.

  • Law, J. (2004b). Matter-ing: Or how might STS contribute. Published by the Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University at http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/sociology/research/publications/papers/law-matter-ing.pdf. Last accessed 4 Mar 2014.

  • Lawson, V. (1995). The politics of difference: Examining the quantitative/qualitative dualism in post-structuralist feminist research. Professional Geographer, 47, 449–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linková, M., & Stöckelová, T. (2012). Public accountability and the politicization of science: The peculiar journey of Czech research assessment. Science and Public Policy, 39, 618–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz-Meyer, D. (2014). Reassembling gender: On the immanent politics of gendering apparatuses of bodily production in science. Women: A Cultural Review, 25, 78–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, E. (2011). Fiery, luminous, scary. SubStance, 40, 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. (2004). Global anxieties: Concept-metaphors and pre-theoretical commitments in anthropology. Anthropological Theory, 4, 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M.-L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 186, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M.-L. (1992). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41, 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scully, M. A. (2002). Confronting errors in the meritocracy. Organization, 9, 396–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters (pp. 26–56). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wareing, S., & Sabri, D. (2013). ‘Institutional research: Symbiosis or oxymoron?’. Paper given at the conference Ethnographies of higher education: Researching and reflecting “at home”, Prague 22–24 May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the members of the GenPhys group for their interest and encouragement to revisit this material and the two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. Part of the empirical material has been previously discussed in a Czech publication on boundary contestations in Socialní studia (2012/2013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dagmar Lorenz-Meyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lorenz-Meyer, D. (2016). Failed Encounters or the Challenges of Rendering Gender a Matter of Concern. In: Bull, J., Fahlgren, M. (eds) Illdisciplined Gender. Crossroads of Knowledge. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15272-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15272-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15271-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15272-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics