Advertisement

An Estimation of Torsional Compliance (Stiffness) from Free-Free FRF Measurements: eRCF Application

  • Jeffrey Poland
  • Alexander Young
  • Hasan Pasha
  • Randall AllemangEmail author
  • Allyn Phillips
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

The enhanced rotational compliance function (eRCF) is a useful concept for estimation of static torsional compliance/stiffness of a structure using measured frequency response functions (FRFs) from a structural system with free-free boundary conditions. The eRCF is estimated using FRF measurements from impact testing, namely a four by four (4 × 4) FRF matrix at four separate, symmetric locations on a structure. A companion paper presents the complete theoretical development and initial analytical and experimental examples. The theoretical background is summarized in this paper along with the results from extensive testing on automotive bodies, involving several tests on the same body style along with tests from different body styles. Comparisons are made to traditional, static torsion tests and a discussion of practical implementation is included.

Keywords

Torsional stiffness Static torsion test eRCF 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank a number of individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort. Bill Buckley at BMW-MC, Helmut Schneeweiss, Dr. Luc Cremers, and Martin Kolbe at BMW-AG, Mike Messman at Clemson-ICAR.

References/Literature Citations

  1. 1.
    Pasha H, Allemang RJ, Phillips AW (2015) Estimation of torsional compliance (stiffness) from free-free FRF measurments: eRCF theory. Proceedings, International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rediers B, Yang B, Juneja V (1998) Static and dynamic stiffness – one test, both results. Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC) XVI – a conference and exposition on structural dynamicsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Griffiths D, Aubert A, Green ER, Ding J,A technique for relating vehicle structural modes to stiffness as determined in static determinate tests, SAE technical paper series (2003-01-1716)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deleener J, Mas P, Cremers L, Poland J,Extraction of static car body stiffness from dynamic measurements, SAE technical paper series, (2010-01-0228)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Helsen J, Cremers L, Mas P, Sas P (2010) Global static and dynamic car body stiffness based upon a single experimental modal analysis test. Proceedings, ISMA noise and vibration conference, pp 2505–2541Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cremers L, Spickenreuther M, Danninger A, Van Herbruggen J (2012) Full car body static and dynamic stiffness identification based on a single detailed modal measurement. LMS European vehicle conferenceGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pasha HG (2014) Estimation of static stiffnesses from free boundary dynamic (FRF) measurements. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 227 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown DL, Allemang RJ, Phillips AW (2015) Forty years of use and abuse of impact testing: a practical guide to making good FRF measurements. Proceedings, international modal analysis conference (IMAC)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Poland
    • 1
  • Alexander Young
    • 2
  • Hasan Pasha
    • 2
  • Randall Allemang
    • 2
    Email author
  • Allyn Phillips
    • 2
  1. 1.Acoustic AnalystBMW Manufacturing Co., LLCGreerUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied ScienceUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations