Skip to main content

Impact of Numerical Model Verification and Validation Within FAA Certification

  • Conference paper
  • 1434 Accesses

Abstract

The mission of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is to provide the safest, most efficient aerospace system in the world. The FAA Aircraft Certification Service is responsible for the design and production approval and airworthiness certification of all U.S. civil aviation products. Historically, design approval has required physical tests, however the FAA allows for the use of modeling and simulation (M&S) to demonstrate compliance with federal regulations. This allows an applicant to reduce the number of tests required to certify a design by relying on the results of M&S. As with all M&S use, verification and validation are fundamental in establishing the credibility of the computational models of aircraft components. Through several government-industry workshops, there is an apparent need for better guidance and training for both parties to understand how to communicate M&S and Verification and Validation (V&V) activities to support certification decisions. Current efforts focus on the level of detail required to document the M&S and V&V activities by an applicant such that the FAA can make an informed certification decision resulting in safe aircraft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Code of Federal Regulations Title 14, Part 25 (2014) Airworthiness standards: transport category airplanes, subpart C – structure. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular (AC) 20–146 (2003) Methodology for dynamic seat certification by analysis for use in parts 23, 25, 27, and 29 airplanes and rotorcraft. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice 5765 (2012) Analytical methods for aircraft seat design and evaluation. SAE International, Warrendale

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st century. Public Law 106-181, House Resolution 1000, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  5. Federal Aviation Administration Policy ANE-2006-33.94-2 (2009) Use of structural dynamics analysis methods for blade containment and rotor unbalance tests. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ray M, Mongiardini M, Plaxico C, Anghileri M (2010) Procedures for verification and validation of computer simulations used for roadside safety applications. National Cooperative Highway Research Program project 22–24, report no 179. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reporting of Computational Modeling Studies in Medical Device Submissions (2014) Draft guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Document no 1807, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. ASME V&V 10–2006 (2006) Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Federal Aviation Administration Order 8110.4C (2005) Type certification. Administration

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this paper are the opinions of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy. Certification approvals are based on federal regulations, official FAA policy, and certification engineers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Moorcroft .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moorcroft, D.M., Pellettiere, J. (2015). Impact of Numerical Model Verification and Validation Within FAA Certification. In: Atamturktur, H., Moaveni, B., Papadimitriou, C., Schoenherr, T. (eds) Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15224-0_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15224-0_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15223-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15224-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics