Skip to main content

Ignoring Rotational DoFs in Decoupling Structures Connected Through Flexotorsional Joints

  • Conference paper
Dynamics of Coupled Structures, Volume 4

Abstract

Substructure decoupling consists in the identification of the dynamic behaviour of a structural subsystem, starting from the dynamic behaviour of both the assembled system and the residual subsystem (the known portion of the assembled system). The degrees of freedom (DoFs) of the coupled system can be partitioned into internal DoFs (not belonging to the couplings) and coupling DoFs. In direct decoupling, a fictitious subsystem that is the negative of the residual subsystem is added to the coupled system, and appropriate compatibility and equilibrium conditions are enforced at interface DoFs. Compatibility and equilibrium can be required either at coupling DoFs only (standard interface), or at additional internal DoFs of the residual subsystem (extended interface), or at some coupling DoFs and some internal DoFs of the residual subsystem (mixed interface). In this paper, a test bench is considered made by a cantilever column with two staggered short arms coupled to a horizontal beam. This involves both flexural and torsional DoFs, on which rotational FRFs are quite difficult to measure. Using a mixed interface, rotational DoFs are neglected and substituted by internal translational DoFs. Experimental results are presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. de Klerk D, Rixen DJ, Voormeeren S (2008) General framework for dynamic substructuring: history, review, and classification of techniques. AIAA J 46(5):1169–1181

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sestieri A, Salvini P, D’Ambrogio W (1991) Reducing scatter from derived rotational data to determine the frequency response function of connected structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 5(1):25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stanbridge A, Ewins D (1996) Measurement of translational and angular vibration using a scanning laser Doppler vibrometer. Shock Vib 3:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bello M, Sestieri A, D’Ambrogio W, La Gala F (2003) Development of PZT’s as rotational transducers. Mech Syst Signal Process 17(5): 1069–1081

    Google Scholar 

  5. D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2008) Promises and pitfalls of decoupling procedures. In: Proceedings of 26th IMAC, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sjövall P, Abrahamsson T (2008) Substructure system identification from coupled system test data. Mech Syst Signal Process 22(1):15–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2010) The role of interface DoFs in decoupling of substructures based on the dual domain decomposition. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(7):2035–2048. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.05.007, also in Proceedings of ISMA 2010, 1863–1880, Leuven (Belgium)

    Google Scholar 

  8. D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2011) Direct decoupling of substructures using primal and dual formulation. In: Conference proceedings of the society of experimental mechanics series, vol 4. Linking models and experiments, vol 2, 31 January–3 February 2011. Springer, Jacksonville, pp 47–76

    Google Scholar 

  9. D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2012) Direct hybrid formulation for substructure decoupling. In: Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series, vol 27. Topics in experimental dynamics substructuring and wind turbine dynamics, vol 2, 30 January–2 February 2012. Springer, Jacksonville, pp 89–107

    Google Scholar 

  10. D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2014) Inverse dynamic substructuring using direct hybrid assembly in the frequency domain. Mech Syst Signal Process 45(2):360–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Voormeeren SN, Rixen DJ (2012) A family of substructure decoupling techniques based on a dual assembly approach. Mech Syst Signal Process 27:379–396. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.07.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2014) Are rotational DoFs essential in substructure decoupling? In: Allen M, Mayes R, Rixen D (eds) Dynamics of coupled structures, vol 1. Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series. Springer International Publishing, Heidelberg, pp 27–36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by grants from University of Rome La Sapienza and University of L’Aquila.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annalisa Fregolent .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

D’Ambrogio, W., Fregolent, A. (2015). Ignoring Rotational DoFs in Decoupling Structures Connected Through Flexotorsional Joints. In: Allen, M., Mayes, R., Rixen, D. (eds) Dynamics of Coupled Structures, Volume 4. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15209-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15209-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15208-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15209-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics