Advertisement

Digital Addiction Ontology for Social Networking Systems

  • Amen Alrobai
  • Huseyin Dogan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8852)

Abstract

Digital Addiction (hereafter referred to as DA) is an emerging, perhaps controversial, issue that is expected to profoundly impact modern societies. Different types of addiction, such as drugs, gambling and alcohol, have clear standards, regulations and policies on how to manufacture, market and sell them. In great contrast, DA has received little recognition or guidance in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and social media research communities. These communities are required to support software industry to provide ways to develop products that are more aware of DA. This research focuses on conceptualising DA to advance the understanding of how the design of social networking systems might influence human behaviour in a way that facilitates addiction. This paper presents an initial ontology and logical models for DA, and discusses potential HCI related implications.

Keywords

Digital addiction Social networking Human computer interaction Software engineering Ontology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ha, J.H., et al.: Psychiatric comorbidity assessed in Korean children and adolescents who screen positive for Internet addiction. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Young, K.S., de Abreu, C.N.: Internet addiction: A handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Griffiths, M.: Does Internet and computer addiction exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology and Behavior 3, 211–218 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hammersley, R.: Personal e-mail communication to ADDICT-L discussion group (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hart, J., et al.: Exploring the facebook experience: a new approach to usability, pp. 471–474 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thompson, A.-J., Kemp, E.A.: Web 2.0: extending the framework for heuristic evaluation, pp. 29–36 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    King, D., Delfabbro, P., Griffiths, M.: Video Game Structural Characteristics: A New Psychological Taxonomy 8, 90–106 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goh, D.H., Ang, R.P., Tan, H.C.: Strategies for designing effective psychotherapeutic gaming interventions for children and adolescents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 2217–2235 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schüll, N.D.: Addiction by Design. Princeton University Press (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dickerson, C.E.: Towards a logical and scientific foundation for system concepts, principles, and terminology. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dogan, H., Barot, V., Henshaw, M., Siemieniuch, C.: Formalisation and mapping of terminologies for Systems of Systems Engineering thesaurus. Presented at the 2013 8th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE) (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research methods in human-computer interaction (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hsieh, H.F.: Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Suler, J.: The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7, 321–326 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5, 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hesse, W.: Ontologies in the Software Engineering Process (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caplan, S.E.: A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication 55, 721–736 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davis, R.A.: A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 17, 187–195 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Griffiths, M.: Gambling on the internet: A brief note. J. Gambling Stud. 12, 471–473 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dogan, H., de C. Henshaw, M.J., Ragsdell, G.: The Risk of Information Management Without Knowledge Management: A Case Study. J. Info. Know. Mgmt. 10, 393–408 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Block, J.: Issues for DSM-V: Internet Addiction. Am. J. Psychiatry 165, 306–307 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alrobai, A., Phalp, K., Ali, R.: Digital addiction: a requirements engineering perspective. In: Salinesi, C., van de Weerd, I. (eds.) REFSQ 2014. LNCS, vol. 8396, pp. 112–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yogo, K., et al.: Incentive-rewarding mechanism to stimulate activities in social networking services. International Journal of Network Management 22, 1–11 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gacitua, R., et al.: Making Tacit Requirements Explicit. Presented at the 2009 Second International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK) (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Widyanto, L., Griffiths, M.: internet addiction: a critical review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 4(1), 31–51 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Newman, W.M.: Busy days: exposing temporal metrics, problems and elasticities through diary studies. In: CHI 2004 Workshop on Temporal Issues in Work (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bournemouth UniversityPooleUK

Personalised recommendations