Abstract
Different types of large-scale and complex modeling and simulation (M&S) applications are used in dozens of disciplines under diverse objectives such as acquisition, problem solving (analysis), education, entertainment, research, and training. Assessment of the quality of such M&S applications requires multifaceted knowledge and experience, and poses substantial technical and managerial challenges for researchers, practitioners, and engineers. The challenges can only be met by following a structured quality-centered approach throughout the entire M&S life cycle. This chapter presents dozens of quality indicators throughout the entire M&S life cycle. These quality indicators can be adopted to achieve success in a large-scale and complex M&S project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balci O (1998) Chapter 10. Verification, validation, and testing. In: Banks J (ed) The handbook of simulation. Wiley, New York, pp 335–393
Balci O (2003) Verification, validation, and certification of modeling and simulation applications. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference (New Orleans, LA, Dec. 7–10). IEEE, Piscataway, pp 150–158
Balci O (2004) Quality assessment, verification, and validation of modeling and simulation applications. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference (Washington, DC, Dec. 5–8). IEEE, Piscataway, pp 122–129
Balci O (2012) A life cycle for modeling and simulation. Simulation Trans Soc Model Simul Int 88(7):870–883
Balci O, Ormsby WF (2008) Network-centric military system architecture assessment methodology. Int J Syst Syst Eng 1(1–2):271–292
Balci O, Sargent RG (1981) A methodology for cost-risk analysis in the statistical validation of simulation models. Commun ACM 24(4):190–197
Balci O, Nance RE, Arthur JD, Ormsby WF (2002) Expanding our horizons in verification, validation, and accreditation research and practice. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference (San Diego, CA, Dec. 8–11). IEEE, Piscataway, pp 653–663
Balci O, Arthur JD, Ormsby WF (2011) Achieving reusability and composability with a simulation conceptual model. J Simul 5(3):157–165
IEEE (2000) IEEE standard for modeling and simulation (M&S) high level architecture (HLA) – framework and rules, IEEE Standard No. 1516–2000. IEEE, Piscataway
Ören TI (1981) Concepts and criteria to assess acceptability of simulation studies: a frame of reference. Commun ACM 24(4):180–189
Pressman RS (2010) Software engineering: a practitioner’s approach, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Sommerville I (2011) Software engineering, 9th edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balci, O. (2015). Quality Indicators Throughout the Modeling and Simulation Life Cycle. In: Yilmaz, L. (eds) Concepts and Methodologies for Modeling and Simulation. Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15096-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15096-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15095-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15096-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)