Institutional Pressures, Environmental Responsibility and Social Legitimacy: Longitudinal Analysis Applied to Golf Tourism

  • Alfonso Vargas-Sánchez
  • Francisco J. Riquel-Ligero
Chapter

Abstract

Tourism and natural environment are a binomial difficult to separate. In this paper, the evolution of the institutional context of environmental character is studied during the 2007–2010 period, comprising one of the most severe phases of recession in the contemporary Spanish economy. For the purposes of this study we have selected golf tourism (as an economic activity that, potentially, can generate strong environmental impacts for its development) and Andalusia as the leading regional golf tourism destination in Spain. Once identified the institutional pressures of environmental nature (coercive, normative and mimetic) impacting on it, we have used the Partial Least Square (PLS) technique to analyze their evolution and its influence on the construct of Environmental Responsibility in these organizations, which play a relevant role within the tourism offer in Spain. This way, a dynamic view of institutionalist principles and their evolution will be given, which determine the social legitimacy of tourism organizations in general and golf courses in particular. As main conclusions, we observed that, over time, the institutional environment in the sector of Andalusian golf courses has increased its power of influence and its capacity to boost isomorphism, determining the environmental policies of such organizations.

References

  1. Ahlstrom D, Bruton GD (2001) Learning from successful local private firms in China: establishing legitimacy. Acad Manage Exec 15(4):72–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich H, Fiol C (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad Manage Rev 19(4):645–670Google Scholar
  3. Aragón J, Rocha F (2009) Los actores de la responsabilidad social empresarial. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales 27(1):147–167Google Scholar
  4. Bansal P (2005) Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strat Manage J 26(3):197–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bansal P, Clelland I (2004) Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad Manage J 47(1):93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boza J, Pérez D (2009) Estudio de la responsabilidad social de las empresas. Aplicaciones a las empresas de Gran Canaria. EAWP: Documentos de Trabajo en Análisis Económico 8(4):29–38Google Scholar
  7. Buysse K, Verbeke A (2003) Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strat Manage J 24(5):453–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Camisón C (2010) Effects of coercive regulation versus voluntary and cooperative auto-regulation on environmental adaptation and performance: empirical evidence in Spain. Eur Manage J 28:346–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castellano M, Martín I, Caro FJ (2007) Propuesta de una escala de medición de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa (RSC) en la actividad turística. En: Conocimiento, innovación y emprendedores: camino al futuro, Logroño: Universidad de La Rioja, pp 2621–2632Google Scholar
  10. Chen H, Yu C (2008) Institutional pressures and initiation of internationalization: evidence from Taiwanese small- and medium-sized enterprise. Int Bus Rev 17:331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen H, Griffith D, Hu M (2006) The influence of liability of foreignness on market entry strategies: an illustration of market entry in China. Int Market Rev 23(6):636–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PN (2003) A Partial Least Squares latent variable modelling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf Syst Res 14(2):189–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Claver E, Molina J (2000) Medio ambiente, estrategia empresarial y competitividad. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa 9(1):119–138Google Scholar
  14. De la Cuesta M (2004) El porqué de la responsabilidad social corporativa. Información Comercial Española (ICE) 2813:45–58Google Scholar
  15. Deephouse D (1996) Does isomorphism legitimate? Acad Manage J 39:1024–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Díez Medrano J (1992) Métodos de análisis causal. Cuadernos Metodológicos, 3. CIS, Madrid.Google Scholar
  17. Díez F, Blanco A, Prado C (2010) Medición de la legitimidad organizativa: El caso de las Sociedades de Garantía Recíproca. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 13:115–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DiMaggio P, Powell W (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization field. Am Sociol Rev 48:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DiMaggio P, Powell W (1991) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  20. Egels-Zandén N, Wahlqvist E (2007) Post-partnership strategies for defining corporate responsibility: the business social compliance initiative. J Bus Ethics 70(2):175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Falk R, Miller N (1992) A primer soft modelling. The University of Akron Press, AkronGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernández de Gatta D (2004) Auditorias y Sistemas de Gestión Ambientales en la Unión Europea: Evolución, régimen vigente y perspectivas futuras. Noticias UE, 228Google Scholar
  23. Fernández M, Cuadrado R (2011) La Responsabilidad Social Empresarial en el Sector Hotelero: Revisión de la Literatura Científica. Cuadernos de Turismo 28:47–57Google Scholar
  24. Fornell C, Larcker D (1981) Evaluating structural equation model with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res 18(February):39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Francés P, Borrego A, Velayos C (2003) Códigos éticos en los negocios. Pirámide, MadridGoogle Scholar
  26. Gónzalez J, González O (2005) Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis. Omega 33:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grewal R, Dharwadkar R (2002) The role of the institutional environment in marketing channels. J Market 66:82–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guillén MF (2002) Structural inertia, imitation, and foreign expansion: South Korean firms and business groups in China: 1987–95. Acad Manage J 45(3):509–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henriques I, Sadorsky P (1996) The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: an empirical approach. J Environ Econ Manage 30:381–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heugens P, Lander MW (2009) Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): a meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Acad Manage J 52(1):61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoffman AJ (2001) Linking organizational and field-level analyses. Organ Environ 14(2):133–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. John C, Cannon A, Pouder W (2001) Change drivers in the new millennium: implications for manufacturing strategy research. J Oper Manage 19:143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE (1988) Applied regression analysis and other multivariate analysis methods. PWS-Kent Publishing Company, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  34. Kostova T, Roth K (2002) Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Acad Manage J 45:215–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leal A, Roldán JL (2001) Validación de un Modelo de Implantación de Gestión de Calidad Total y su Efecto en los Resultados Empresariales: un Estudio Causal Predictivo Mediante Análisis Mediante Análisis PLS (Partial Least Squares). En: F. Carlo Morabito y P. Laguna Sánchez (eds). pp 541–555. X International Conference, European Association of Management and Business Economics, Reggio Calabria, ItaliaGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu S, Costanza R, Farber S, Troy A (2010) Valuing ecosystem services. Theory, practice, and the need for the transdisciplinary synthesis. Ann NY Acad Sci 1185:54–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Llamas R (2005) Un análisis institucional de la implantación de la Agenda Local 21 por los Ayuntamientos españoles. PhD dissertation, University of GranadaGoogle Scholar
  38. Lu W (2002) Intra and inter-organizational imitative behaviour: institutional influences on Japanese firms’ entry mode choice. J Int Bus Stud 33(1):19–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meyer K (2001) Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe. J Int Bus Stud 32(2):357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meyer J, Rowan B (1977) Institutional organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 83:340–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meyer J, Scott W (1983) Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In: Meyer J, Scott W (eds) Organizational environment: ritual and rationality. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp 199–215Google Scholar
  42. Numally J (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  43. Oliver C (1991) Strategic response to the institutional process. Acad Manage Rev 16(1):145–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. OMT (1995) Carta del Turismo Sostenible. World Conference on Sustainable Tourism. SpainGoogle Scholar
  45. OMT (1999) Código Ético Mundial del Turismo. Resolución A/RES/406(XIII). UNWTO General Assembly. ChileGoogle Scholar
  46. Palmer DA, Jennings PD, Zhou X (1993) Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: institutional, political and economic accounts. Adm Sci Q 38(1):100–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Porter M, Van Der Linde C (1995) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harv Bus Rev 73:120–137Google Scholar
  48. Reid E, Toffel M (2009) Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strat Manage J 30(11):1157–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reyes L (2008) La investigación en responsabilidad social en los diez últimos años: un análisis de las publicaciones en business and management. En: XXII Congreso Anual de AEDEM. Estableciendo puentes en una economía global (vol 1), ESICGoogle Scholar
  50. Riquel F (2010) Análisis institucional de las prácticas de gestión ambiental de los campos de golf andaluces. PhD dissertation, University of HuelvaGoogle Scholar
  51. Roldán JL, Leal A (2003) A validation test of an adaptation of the DeLone and McLean’s model in the Spanish EIS field. In: Cano JJ (ed) Critical reflections on information systems. A systemic approach. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, pp 66–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Romero Q (2005) Modelo para la evaluación del comportamiento medioambiental: Una aplicación a los campos de golf españoles. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaGoogle Scholar
  53. Sánchez M (2012) A responsabilidade social corporativa no marco da teoría institutional. Universidade de Minho, Centro de Investigação en Ciências Sociais. Working Paper 6:1–35Google Scholar
  54. Scott W (1995) Institutions and organizations. Sage, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  55. Shrivastava P (1995) The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad Manage Rev 20(4):936–960Google Scholar
  56. Valor C, De la Cuesta M (2008) El papel del tercer sector en la promoción de la empresa: análisis de cuatro vías de actuación. Revista Asturiana de Economía 41:25–41Google Scholar
  57. Wold H (1979) Model construction and evaluation when theoretical knowledge is scarce: an example of the use of partial least squares. Cahiers du Département d’Économétrie. Faculté des Sciences Économiques et Sociales, Université de Genève, GenèveGoogle Scholar
  58. Young G, Charns M, Shortell S (2001) Top manager and network effects on the adoption of innovative management practices: a study of TQM in a public hospital system. Strat Manage J 22:935–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zucker L (1977) The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. Am Sociol Rev 42(5):726–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfonso Vargas-Sánchez
    • 1
  • Francisco J. Riquel-Ligero
    • 1
  1. 1.GEIDETUR – University of HuelvaHuelvaSpain

Personalised recommendations