Introduction to Meta-Analysis

  • Nazım ÇoğaltayEmail author
  • Engin Karadağ


As a means to synthesize the results of multiple studies, the chronological development of the meta-analysis method was in parallel to a variety of definitions in the literature. Meta-analysis can be defined in different ways: as a means of summarizing and combining the quantitative results of research or as a method used to reach the quantitative effect size based on individual studies. Meta-analysis uses many quantitative approaches and calculation formulas when compiling multiple research findings. In this sense, no researcher needs to be an expert in all types and calculation formulas for all types of meta-analysis. However, if the researcher lacks familiarity with at least some of the main concepts of meta-analysis, then the correct results may not be obtained. This chapter aims to explain some of the main concepts of meta-analysis.


Average Effect Real Effect Main Concept Calculation Formula Average Effect Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). Handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Durlak, J. A. (1995). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  7. Duval, S. (2005). The trim and fill method. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, & M. Bornstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment, and adjustments (pp. 11–33). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glass, G., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, LA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Glass, G. V., & Smith, M. K. (1978). Meta-analysis of research on the relationship of class size and achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical method for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, R. (1979). Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 721–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kulinskaya, E., Morgenthaler, S., & Staudte, R. G. (2008). Meta analysis: A guide to calibrating and combining statistical evidence. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Littel, H. J., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Petitti, D. B. (2000). Meta analysis, decision analysis and cost effectiveness analysis: Methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance of null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1979). Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 377–386.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32, 752–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Muş Alparslan UniversityMuşTurkey
  2. 2.Eskişehir Osmangazi UniversityEskişehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations