Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of Leadership on Organizational Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leadership and Organizational Outcomes

Abstract

The effect of leadership on organizational justice was examined in this meta-analytic study. A total of 141 research studies were compiled as a result of the review activity, out of which 27 were included in the meta-analysis. The 27 research studies were collapsed to obtain a sample size of 16,639 subjects. The analytic results of the random effects model showed that leadership has a medium-magnitude, positive effect on organizational justice . Of the moderators identified, such as the publication type, year of publication , sample group /sector, leadership style /approach, leadership scale and organizational justice scale, it was found that the publication type, leadership style /approach, leadership scale and organizational justice scale were moderating variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis. The in-text citations to studies selected for meta-analysis are not followed by asterisks.

References

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis. The in-text citations to studies selected for meta-analysis are not followed by asterisks.

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K. (1995). Relationships among pay inequity, perceptions of procedural justice, and organizational citizenship. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 8, 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1988). Transformational leadership, charisma and beyond. In J. G. Hunt, B. R. Balaga, H. P. Bachler, & C. Schriesheim (Eds.), Emerging leadership vista (pp. 29–50). Emsford, NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1996). Construct validation of the multifactor leadership questionnaire MLQ-Form 5X. Center for Leadership Studies Report, 96(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barling, J., & Phillips, M. (1993). Interactional, formal, and distributive justice in the workplace: An exploratory study. Journal of Psychology, 127, 649–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 231–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire (2nd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2002). Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Full range leadership development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria for justice. In B. Sheppard (Ed.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1, 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386

  • Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalışkan, S. C. (2010). The interaction between paternalistic leadership style, organizational justice, and organizational citizenship behavior: A study from Turkey. China-USA Business Review, 9(10), 67–80.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. Z. (2009). Transformational-transactional leadership and work outcomes: An organizational justice and cultural perspective. (Order No. 3394604, Auburn University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 139.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, S. A., Wearing, A. J., & Mann, L. (2000). A short measure of transformational leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(3), 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, J. W., & Dansereau, F. (2010). Are transformational leaders fair? A multi-level study of transformational leadership, justice perceptions, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 409–421.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Farh, J. L. (2000). A triad model of paternalistic leadership: The constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14, 3–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J. Y., Chan Su, J., Kyle, G. T., & Petrick, J. F. (2010). Servant leadership and procedural justice in the U.S. national park service: The antecedents of job satisfaction. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 28(3), 1–15.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, A. T., & Frey, F. M. (1996). The effects of leader fairness and pay outcomes on superior/subordinate relations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1401–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çoğaltay, N., Karadağ, E., & Bektaş, F. (2014). School leadership and organizational justice: A meta-analysis with Turkey representative sample. International Journal of Education, 6(1), 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, W. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R. (1993). Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Baron, R. A. (1991). Injustice and organizational conflict: The moderating effect of power restoration. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2, 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International review o f industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 317–372). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., & Chen, P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group & Organization Management, 27(3), 324–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., Van Dijke, M., & Bos, A. (2004). Distributive justice moderating the effects of self-sacrificial leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(5), 466–475.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, M. G. (2001). Leadership and justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. (Order No. 3035772, University of Maryland College Park). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 111.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 61–94.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerome, S. C. (2008). An examination of relationships between transformational leadership behavior and interactive justice perceptions among membership of a local chapter of human resource professionals. (Order No. 3339016, Capella University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 103.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillet, N., Fouquereau, E., Bonnaud-Antignac, A., Mokounkolo, R., & Colombat, P. (2013). The mediating role of organizational justice in the relationship between transformational leadership and nurses’ quality of work life: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 1359–1367. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.012.*

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S., & Coppins, A. (2012). The intersection of justice and leadership: Testing a moderation model of contingent reward and interpersonal fairness. European Management Journal, 30(6), 490–498.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumusluoglu, L., Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z., & Hirst, G. (2013). Transformational leadership and R&D workers’ multiple commitments: Do justice and span of control matter? Journal of Business Research, 66, 2269–2278.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical method for meta-analysis. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz, B. C., & Harold, C. M. (2013). Effects of leadership consideration and structure on employee perceptions of justice and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 492–519. doi:10.1002/job.1825.*

  • Keller, T., & Dansereau, F. (1995). Leadership and empowerment: A social exchange perspective. Human Relations, 48(2), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiersch, C. E. (2012). A multi-level examination of authentic leadership and organizational justice in uncertain times. (Order No. 3523691, Colorado State University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 142.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Kool, M., & Van Dirk, D. (2012). Servant leadership and commitment to change, the mediating role of justice and optimism. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(3), 422–433. doi:10.1108/09534811211228139.*

  • Kulinskaya, E., Morgenthaler, S., & Staudte, R. G. (2008). Meta-analysis: A guide to calibrating and combining statistical evidence. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., III, & Jenkins, G. D. (1992). Strategic reward systems. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & W. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91–131). New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study o f fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York, NY: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2012). Leadership, supervisor-focused justice, and follower values: A comparison of three leadership approaches in china. (Order No. 3518177, University of Cincinnati). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 122.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Loi, R., Lam, L., & Chan, K. (2012). Coping with job insecurity: The role of procedural justice, ethical leadership and power distance orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 361–372. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1095-3.*

  • Mansour-Cole, D. M., & Scott, S. G. (1998). Hearing it through the grapevine: The influence of source, leader-relations, and legitimacy on survivors’ fairness perceptions. Personnel Psychology, 51, 25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., & Bennett, N. (1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organization commitment. Group and Organization Management, 21, 84–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean Parks, J., & Kidder, D. L. (1994). “Till death us do part…” Changing work relationships in the 1990s. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (pp. 111–136). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., Kemery, E. R., & Wesolowski, M. A. (1998). Relationships between bases of power and work reactions: The meditational role of procedural justice. Journal of Management, 24, 533–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1996). Exploring the relationships between top management behaviors and employee perceptions of fairness. International Journal of Public Administration, 19(6), 941–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oner, Z. H. (2008). The mediating effect of organizational justice: Moderating roles of sense of coherence and job complexity on the relationship between servant leadership, and work engagement. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2006). Leader–member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2), 264–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, R., Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. (1999). Leadership and organizational justice: Similarities and differences across cultures. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(4), 763–779.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, E. V. (2009). The role of procedural justice in public personnel management: Empirical results from the Department of Defense. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroeck, J., May, E. R., & Brown, F. W. (1994). Procedural justice explanations and employee reactions to economic hardship: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 455–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B. (1995). Social distance and charisma: Theoretical notes and an exploratory study. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 19–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The role of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sofiah, K. K., & Mohd Zabid, A. R. (2012). The mediating effect of organizational commitment in the organizational culture, leadership and organizational justice relationship with organizational citizenship behavior: A study of academicians in private higher learning institutions in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(8), 83–91.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R. M. (1963). Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire-Form XII: An experimental revision. Columbus: Bureau of Business Research, College of Commerce and Administration, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom, D. L. (2010). Workplace engagement: The roles of transformational leadership and interactional justice in producing engaged employees. (Order No. 1476770, Western Illinois University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 84.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Tata, J., & Bowes-Sperry, L. (1996). Emphasis on distributive, procedural, and interactional justice: Differential perceptions of men and women. Psychological Reports, 79, 1327–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2012). The effect of procedural justice in the relationship between charismatic leadership and feedback reactions in performance appraisal. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(15), 3047–3062. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.639535.*

  • Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., & van Quaquebeke, N. (2012). When does procedural fairness promote organizational citizenship behavior? Integrating empowering leadership types in relational justice models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 235–248.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Wu, C., & Orwa, B. (2008). Contingent reward transactional leadership, work attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of procedural justice climate perceptions and strength. Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 251–265.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Ma, L., & Zhang, M. (2014). Transformational leadership and agency workers’ organizational commitment: The mediating effect of organizational justice and job characteristics. Social Behavior and Personality, 42(1), 25–36.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. (1999). The effects o f distributive and procedural justice on performance. Journal o f Psychology, 133, 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., Huang, X., Li, C., & Liu, W. (2012). Perceived interactional justice and trust-in-supervisor as mediators for paternalistic leadership. Management & Organization Review, 8(1), 97–121. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00283.x.*

  • Zehir, C., Akyuz, B., Eren, M. S., & Turhan, G. (2013). The indirect effects of servant leadership behavior on organizational citizenship behavior and job performance: Organizational justice as a mediator. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 2(3), 1–13.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeinabadi, H., & Rastegarpour, H. (2010). Factors affecting teacher trust in principal: Testing the effect of transformational leadership and procedural justice. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1004–1008.*

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey

    Yasir Armağan

  2. Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin, Turkey

    Evren Erzen

Authors
  1. Yasir Armağan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Evren Erzen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasir Armağan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Odunpazari, Eskisehir, Turkey

    Engin Karadağ

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Armağan, Y., Erzen, E. (2015). The Effect of Leadership on Organizational Justice . In: Karadağ, E. (eds) Leadership and Organizational Outcomes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14908-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation