Sustainable Development, Knowledge Society and Smart Future Manufacturing Technologies pp 3-18 | Cite as
Challenges for Planetary Stewardship at the Entry of the Period of the Anthropocene
- 918 Downloads
Abstract
In the long human history from the period of the use of stone ax tools and the agricultural revolution to the various phases of the industrial revolution from the 18th century and onwards all sorts of innovative approaches have been applied by humans for the sake of survival and prosperity. In earlier days the environmental impacts due to these solutions were limited—although not always locally or even regionally negligible as the example of hunting of big animals illustrates. Closer to our times the character of the solutions, their systemic connections and the global width of application has drastically changed the situation. Today it is not only the “classical” industrial manufacture of products that have environmental repercussions, but the entire support system for daily life which includes a global connectivity of food provisions and new kinds of energy solutions as examples. These illustrate the integrated cross sectorial nature of the challenge due to their character, intensity and global embrace. Indeed, humans have during the latest generation taken over as the prime driving force with regard to global environmental impacts. And the character of the transformation is accelerating. Thus we are quickly moving into a new historical era—sometimes called the Anthropocene. This confronts us with issues about the relation between actions at different scales—including challenges regarding the material base for society and its natural environmental embedding. This has been referred to—in risk handling terms at global level—to a concern for living within a safe space set by “planetary boundaries”. The interplay between the global macro level and other levels, not least with regard to governance and responsibility considerations, i.e. “stewardship”, is at the core of our current societal situation. Systems and resilience considerations are now coming into the forefront when approaching this key “grand challenge”. But also the societal distributional aspects increase in importance. The basis of our knowledge production and handling in connection to the expressed and used value systems are here of central importance when we have to face what stewardship at different scale levels from micro to macro might entail.
Keywords
Anthropocene Complexity Culture European outlook Future outlook Global development Industrial revolution Innovations Knowledge production Long term history Manufacture Perspectives Regions Resilience Scale Solutions Sustainability Systems UncertaintyReferences
- Bagley R (ed) (2001) Ancient Sichuan. Treasures from a lost civilization. The Seattle Arts Museum in Association with Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Barthel S, Crumley C, Svedin U (2013) Bio cultural refugia—safeguarding diversity of practices for food security and biodiversity. Glob Environ Change 23(5):1142–1152Google Scholar
- Bengtsson J et al (2010) Future agriculture—livestock, crops and land use. A strategic programme for research. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), SwedenGoogle Scholar
- Chapin FS et al (2000) Consequences of changing biotic diversity. Nature 405:234–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- COMPLEX, EU-project (2012–2016). Knowledge Based Climate Mitigation Systems for a Low Carbon Economy. www.complex2050.eu
- Crépin A-S (2007) Using fast and slow processes to manage resources with thresholds. Environ Resour Econ 36:191–213Google Scholar
- Crutzen PJ (2002) Geology of mankind: the Anthropocene. Nature 415:23Google Scholar
- Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The “Anthropocene”. Glob Change Newsl 41:17–18Google Scholar
- Falkenmark M, Rockström J, Karlberg L (2009) Present and future water requirements for feeding humanity. Food Secur 1:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:557–581Google Scholar
- FAO (2011) FAO food price index. Downloaded from www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/wfs-home/foodpricesindex/en/
- IAASTD (2009) Agriculture at a crossroads, International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
- Liljenström H, Svedin U (eds) (2005) Micro, meso, makro. Addressing complex systems couplings. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- Richardson K et al (2009) Synthesis report. Climate change: global risks, challenges and decisions. University of Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009a) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14(2):32. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32 (This is a more elaborated version at the same time and with the same authors of the article referred to below, i.e. Rockström et al in Nature, 2009b)
- Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009b) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475 (A more detailed presentation was published at the same time by the same authors (2009a) in Ecology and Society 14(2):32. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32)
- Rockström J, Falkenmark M, Allan T, Folke C, Jagerskog A, Kummu M, Lannerstad M, Meybeck M, Molden D, Postel S, Savenije HHG, Svedin U, Turton A, Varis O (2014) The unfolding water drama in the Antropocene: towards a resilience-based perspective on water for global sustainability, Ecohydrology 7(5):1249–1261Google Scholar
- Seitzinger SP, Svedin U, Crumley C, Arif S, Alfsen C, Broadgate W, Biermann F, Bondre N, Dearing J, Deutsch L, Dhakal S, Farahbakhshazad N, Gaffney O, Haberl H, Lavorel S, Mbow C, McMichael AJ, Morais J, Olsson P, Pinho P, Seto K, Sinclair P, Stafford-Smith M, Steffen W, Sugar L (2012) Planetary stewardship in an urbanising world: beyond city limits. AMBIO 41(8):787–794Google Scholar
- Steffen W, Sanderson A, Tyson PD, Jäger J, Matson P, Moore B III, Oldfield F, Richardson K, Schellnhuber HJ, Turner BL, Wasson RJ (2004) Global Change and the Earth System: a planet under pressure, IGBP Global Change Series. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Steffen W, Crutzen PJ, McNeill JR (2007) The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature. Ambio 36(8):614Google Scholar
- Steffen W, Persson Å, Deutsch L, Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Richardson K, Crumley C, Crutzen P, Folke C, Gordon L, Molina M, Ramanathan V, Rockström J, Scheffer M, Schellnhuber J, Svedin U (2011) The anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship. Contribution (background report Nr. 2) to the 3rd nobel laureate symposium on global sustainability, Stockholm, May 2011. Published in Ambio. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s.13280-011-0185-x
- Svedin U (2009) Towards the gardening of the planet in the period of the Anthropocene: the world as socio-bio-space (SBS). Future options and challenges. Report to the EU foresight study “The world in 2025. Rising Asia and socio-ecological transition” published in summary by the European Commission, DG Research, EUR 23921, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Svedin U (2011a) Urban development and the environmental challenges—‘green’ systems considerations, European Commission, DG Regio, 2011. Thematic issue paper to the project “Cities of tomorrow—challenges, visions, ways forward”. Ref. via the EU web link ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/conferences/citiesoftomorrow/index_en.cfm with specific reference to “urban environmental challenges”
- Svedin U (2011b) Issues that need to be addressed—assessing experience. In: Kasperson RE, Berberian M (eds) Integrating science and policy—vulnerability and resilience in global environmental change. Science in society series (chapter 17). Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Svedin U (2012) Global conditions for the future of agriculture in the “anthropocen”. In: Jacquet P, Pachauri RK, Tubiana L (eds) Development, the environment and food: towards agricultural change? (chapter 6). A planet for life 2012, French Development Agency (AFD), The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) and The Institute for Sustainable Development and International relations (IDDRI), TERI Press, New Delhi (A French version was published simultaneously under the name “2012 Regards sur la Terre. Développement, alimentation, environnement: changer l´agriculture?”)Google Scholar
- Sweitzer J, Langaas S, Folke C (1996) Land cover and population density in the baltic sea drainage basin: a GIS database. Ambio 25(3):191–198Google Scholar
- The 3rd EU SCAR Foresight Exercise (FEG3) (expert report) (2011) Sustainable food consumption and production in a resource-constrained world. ec.europa.eu/research/agriculture/scar/pdf/scar_feg3_final_report_report_01_02_2011.pdf
- UK Government Office for Science (2011) The future of food and farming. Final report, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zillén L, Conley DJ, Andrén T, Andren E, Björk S (2008) Past occurrences of hypoxia in the Baltic Sea and the role of climate variability, environmental change, and human impact. Earth-Sci Rev 91:77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar