Abstract
Chapter 4 discussed delay reduction resulting from reduction in the response time to incidents. This chapter describes the other significant ITS approach to mitigating non-recurrent congestion, namely providing motorists with information. Since messaging policies and diversion effects for recurrent and non-recurrent congestion may be different, these subjects are covered in two different chapters.
Motorist information can mitigate non-recurrent congestion in the following ways:
-
Induce a motorist traveling on the freeway to divert in the event of an incident. Circumstances that induce diversion include:
-
Capacity reducing incidents on the freeway on which the motorist is traveling or on freeways that are accessed by the freeway on which the motorist is traveling.
-
Capacity reducing incidents and construction for special events on remote facilities. Avoiding the incident on the remote facility may require the motorist to modify his route on the facility that he is currently using.
-
-
Prior to the start of a trip or early in the trip, induce a motorist to change his travel mode or the start time of his trip.
-
Make the motorist aware of unusual conditions such as incidents, lane blockages and lane closures. Accidents are reduced by facilitating the motorists’ earlier preparation for these events.
Section 3.1.4 discusses the general issues relating to diversion resulting from non-recurrent congestion and shows several diversion curves. It also discusses policy issues related to motorist information for non-recurrent congestion. The following topics are covered this chapter in connection with diversion to avoid incidents:
-
The techniques for communicating with motorists.
-
Strategies and policies or developing messages and the use of the content and the strength of the message to influence the percentage of motorists diverting.
-
Semi-automatic and manually implemented strategies for controlling diversion.
-
The effect of diverted traffic on alternate routes.
-
Models for delay reduction resulting from diversion for the diverted traffic, non-diverted traffic remaining on the freeway and corridor traffic.
-
The effect of diverted traffic on alternate routes and the necessity for controlling the impact.
The chapter provides guidance and some simple models to assist the engineer in locating dynamic message signs. The importance of the quality of motorist information is discussed, and a simple evaluation measure is provided. The use of ITS for emergency evacuation is introduced and a model for generating and disseminating information is discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Connected Vehicle Applications, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www.its.dot.gov/connected_vehicle/connected_vehicle_apps.htm Online 14 Sept 2014
Dudek CL (2004) Changeable message sign operation and messaging handbook. Federal Highway Administration Report No. FHWA-OP-03-070, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
Travel Time Messages on Dynamic Message Signs, Federal Highway Administration. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/travelinfo/dms/signs.htm Online 14 Sept 2014
DTA System Enhancement and Evaluation of Traffic Management Center, Task P: Framework for the Use of DynaMIT-P (2000) Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Peeta S et al (2000) Content of variable message signs and on-line driver behavior. In: 79th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
Mansoureh J, Ardshirri A (2013) Exploring travelers’ behavior in response to dynamic message signs (DMS) using a driving simulator. Report No. MD-13-SP209B4K, Morgan State University, Oct 2013
Foo S et al (2008) Impacts of changed CMS messages on traffic diversion rates. In: 87th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
Kachroo P, Ozbay K (1999) Feedback control theory for dynamic traffic assignment. Springer, London
Abbas MM, McCoy PT (1999) Optimizing variable message sign locations on freeways using genetic algorithm. In: 78th annual meeting of Transportation Research Board, 10–14 Jan 1999, Washington, DC
2009 report on customer satisfaction. Delaware Department of Transportation
Intelligent transportation systems for traveler information—deployment benefits and lessons learned. U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www.its.dot.gov/jpodocs/repts_te/14319.htm. Accessed 27 May 2008
Americas travel information number—implementation and operational guidelines for 511 services, version 3.0 (2005) 511 Deployment Coalition, Washington, DC
Neudorff LG et al (2003) Freeway management and operations handbook. Federal Highway Administration Report FHWA-OP-04-003, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
Pal A et al (2005) Enhancements to emergency evacuation procedures. UTCA Final Report 01105, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, Aug 2005
Oak Ridge evaluation modeling system (OREMS), Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. http://cta.ornl.gov/cta/One_Pagers/OREMS.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2008
Communicating with the public using ATIS during disasters—concept of operations (2006) Batelle and PBSJ, Columbus, OH
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gordon, R. (2016). Non-recurrent Congestion: Incident Information to Motorists. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14768-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14768-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14767-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14768-0
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)