Skip to main content

Best Practice in University Strategic Management’s Conceptual Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategic Management of Universities in the Ibero-America Region

Abstract

This article brings forward a definition of best practice (BP) in university strategic management, drawing upon the European Foundation for Quality Management’s (EFQM) model, exploring the potential contribution of the EFQM model in assessing best practices in the context of university management. The article proposes a conceptual framework that aims to identify, assess and accredit best practice. This conceptual model includes the definition of the requirements needed and the assessment dimensions and focuses on the content of good practice: its deployment, impact and the results provided, its evaluation and revision, its innovation and replicability and the various benefits of its accreditation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the purposes of this chapter, the concepts of “higher education institutions” and “universities” will be used interchangeably. This does not mean that they should be taken as synonymous concepts, given the fact that both concepts are widely known and characterized within the specialized literature, including the various national and regional systems of higher education. It is simply applied to facilitate the reading of the text.

  2. 2.

    EFQM Model 2013 ©EFQM (2012). See: www.clubexcelencia.org

  3. 3.

    See: http://www.clubexcelencia.org/Portals/0/boletin/bu6_nueva_version_perfil.pdf (in Spanish).

  4. 4.

    See Telescopi Excellence criteria: http://telescopi.upc.edu/bdcasos/ (in Spanish).

References

  • Allur, E. (2010). The dissemination of the EFQM self-evaluation model across Europe. Review of International Comparative Management, 11(5), 971–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo-Mora, A., Leal, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2006). Using enablers of the EFQM model to manage institutions of higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(2), 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., et al. (2007). The effect of academic culture on the implementation of the EFQM Excellence Model in UK universities. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(4), 382–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolowitz, D. (2000). Policy transfer and British social policy. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom? A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44, 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFQM. (2012). EFQM Annual Report 2011–2012. Brussels: EFQM.

    Google Scholar 

  • EFQM list of members. http://www.efqm.org/en/PdfResources/Members%20list%202013.pdf. Accessed 9 Sept 2013.

  • EFQM Recognition. http://www.efqm.org/en/Home/Ourservices/Recognition/RecognitionOnline/tabid/333/Default.aspx. Accessed 9 Sept 2013.

  • Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the States: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1174–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hides, M. T., et al. (2004). Implementation of EFQM excellence model self-assessment in the UK higher education sector – Lessons learned from other sectors. The TQM Magazine, 16(3), 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperavičiūtė, R. (2011). L’application du modèle EFQM d’excellence aux établissements de l’enseignement supérieur. Public Policy and Administration, 10(3), 387–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J., Raine, J., & Skelcher, C. (2000). Innovation and best practice in local government: A research report. London: DETR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osseo-Asare, A. E., et al. (2002). The need for education and training in the use of the EFQM model for quality management in UK higher education institutions. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osseo-Asare, A. E., Longbottom, D., & Murphy, W. D. (2005). Leadership best practices for sustaining quality in UK higher education from the perspective of the EFQM Excellence Model. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(2), 148–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RED TELESCOPI. (2012). Network of observatories of best practices in strategic university management in Latin America and Europe – Telescopi Network. Guide for the formulation, identification and evaluation of best practices related to the management of institutions of higher education. Barcelona. http://cudu.upc.edu/telescopi-espanya/presentar-bp/criteris-davaluacio.

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). The diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). London: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (2005). Learning from comparative public policy: A practical guide. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steed, C., et al. (2005). The EFQM Excellence model for deploying quality management: A British-Russian journey. Higher Education in Europe, 30(3–4), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tari, J. J., et al. (2011). Preparing Jordanian university services to implement a quality self-assessment methodology. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(1), 138–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 297–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jairo H. Cifuentes-Madrid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cifuentes-Madrid, J.H., Arranz-Vals, P., Deulofeu, J. (2015). Best Practice in University Strategic Management’s Conceptual Framework. In: Cifuentes-Madrid, J., Landoni Couture, P., Llinàs-Audet, X. (eds) Strategic Management of Universities in the Ibero-America Region. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14684-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics