New Ideas for Brain Modelling 2

  • Kieran Greer
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 591)


This paper describes a relatively simple way of allowing a brain model to self-organise its concept patterns through nested structures. For a simulation, time reduction is helpful and it would be able to show how patterns may form and then fire in sequence, as part of a search or thought process. It uses a very simple equation to show how the inhibitors in particular, can switch off certain areas, to allow other areas to become the prominent ones and thereby define the current brain state. This allows for a small amount of control over what appears to be a chaotic structure inside of the brain. It is attractive because it is still mostly mechanical and therefore can be added as an automatic process, or the modelling of that. The paper also describes how the nested pattern structure can be used as a basic counting mechanism. Another mathematical conclusion provides a basis for maintaining memory or concept patterns. The self-organisation can space itself through automatic processes. This might allow new neurons to be added in a more even manner and could help to maintain the concept integrity. The process might also help with finding memory structures afterwards. This extended version integrates further with the existing cognitive model and provides some new conclusions.


Neural modelling Self-organise Connection strengths Mathematical process 


  1. 1.
    Carpenter, G., Grossberg, S., Rosen, D.: Fuzzy ART: fast stable learning and categorization of analog patterns by an adaptive resonance system. Neural Netw.4, 759–771 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dorigo, M., Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G.: Ant algorithms and stigmergy. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 16, 851–871 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grassé, P.P.: La reconstruction dun id et les coordinations internidividuelles chez Bellicositermes natalensis et Cubitermes sp. La théorie de la stigmergie: essais d’interprétation du comportment des termites constructeurs. Insectes Sociaux6, 41–84 (1959)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Greer, K.: New ideas for brain modelling. In: Iantovics, B.L., Zamfirescu, C.B., Revett, K., Gligor, A. (eds.) Special Issue on: From Natural Computing to Self-organizing Intelligent Complex Systems. IGI Global (2014). Published on arXiv at, accepted for publication by J. Inf. Technol. Res. (JITR)
  5. 5.
    Greer, K.: Artificial neuron modelling based on wave shape, brain. Broad Res. Artif. Intell. Neurosci. 4 (1–4), 20–25 (2013). ISSN 2067-3957 (online), ISSN 2068-0473 (print)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greer, K.: Turing: then, now and still key. In: X-S. Yang (ed.) Artificial Intelligence, Evolutionary Computation and Metaheuristics (AIECM)—Turing 2012. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 427, pp. 43–62. Springer, Berlin (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-29694-9_3
  7. 7.
    Greer, K.: Symbolic neural networks for clustering higher-level concepts. NAUN Int. J. Comput. 5 (3), 378–386, extended version of the WSEAS/EUROPMENT International Conference on Computers and Computing (ICCC’11) (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hawkins, J. and Blakeslee, S.: On Intelligence. Times Books, NewYork (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hebb, D.O.: The Organisation of Behaviour. Wiley, New York (1949)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hill, S.L., Wang, Y., Riachi, I., Schürmann, F. and Markram, H.: Statistical connectivity provides a sufficient foundation for specific functional connectivity in neocortical neural microcircuits. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 109 (42), E2885 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kandel, E.R.: The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses. Sci. Mag. 294 (5544), 1030–1038 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosin, D.P., Rontani, D., Gauthier, D.J. and Scholl, E.: Control of synchronization patterns in neural-like Boolean networks, ArX. Prepr. Repos. (2013).
  13. 13.
    Vogels, T.P., Kanaka Rajan, K., Abbott, L.F.: Neural network dynamics. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 357–376 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Waxman, S.G.: Sodium channels, the electrogenisome and the electrogenistat: lessons and questions from the clinic. J. Physiol. 2601–2612 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Willie, C.K., Macleod, D.B., Shaw, A.D., Smith, K.J., Tzeng, Y.C., Eves, N.D., Ikeda, K., Graham, J., Lewis, N.C., Day, T.A., Ainslie, P.N.: Regional brain blood flow in man during acute changes in arterial blood gases. J. Physiol.590 (14), 3261–3275 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Distributed Computing SystemsBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations